This review focuses less on the technical aspects of the Ethos and more on
my personal experiences and opinions of its visual quality in fast Newtonians
refractors. I usually prefer to let the designers comment on the technical features
since Iím more of a visual test pilot so to speak. It will be interesting
to hear what others have to say but David Nagler has been wonderful at answering
some of my technical questions.
When I attended NEAF, I spent some time with Televue talking about this new and
innovative eyepiece. I will tell you right off the bat that Iím actually
not an ultrawide eyepiece fan, let alone a hyperwide as in the case of the Ethos.
I tend to favor eyepieces with apparent fields of view not wider than 70 degrees.
Itís not because my eyes cannot see the field-stops in any of these ultrawides,
itís simply because these eyepieces tend to give me the impression of a
very ďin your faceĒ kind of feel. I like things backed off and framed
a bit. With all that said, this does not prevent me from appreciating ultrawide
eyepieces at all.
When Tom Trusock stopped by to visit my booth at NEAF, we exchanged thoughts
on the newly introduced Ethos. At first, I was a bit bummed that the focal length
chosen was so short, just 13mmís. This is because most of my general observations
of deep sky are conducted with a 22mm Panoptic. To me, this focal length is a
nice workhorse for my 10Ē F-5 and 12.5Ē F-5 Newtonians. Tom on the
other hand was very happy with the idea of a 13mm being the choice of focal length.
It didnít really kick in for me until later that I finally gave Tomís
opinion a second thought, as you are about to see.
Just before David and Al were ready to leave NEAF, they stopped by my booth to
say goodbye. I told them both how impressed I was with the Ethos and that Iíd
like some time to test it in the field at RTMC and possibly review it for cloudynights.
Since Al knows his Televue plossls are my favorite planetary eyepieces of all
time, he offered to bring me an original 13mm plossl to compare it to his 13mm
Ethos. This is how confident he was about me comparing the axial contrast of
the Ethos and he knows Iím a stickler for this. Keep the term ďaxialĒ in
mind since weíve all been so overwhelmed by the fact that this is actually
a deep sky eyepiece with an apparent field of view of 100 whopping degrees!
From Left to right, the 13mm Nagler T6, 13mm Ethos and discontinued early generation
13mm Televue plossl.
SOME NEW THINGS ABOUT THE ETHOS:
According to Televue, the Ethos utilizes a newer type of glass. Some observers
(myself included) have commented about the slightly warm views in Televueís
line in fact it was mentioned by one individual at RTMC. Al turned around and
said ďI wonder how that all started!Ē Honestly, I felt like crawling
down a hole. I suppose Iím the culprit since I focused on it during the
planetary eyepiece review a few years back and talk about it on cloudynights
when making comparisons. Never the less, most observers canít even notice
it in the dark and according to Al, the Ethos has a newer glass that is cooler,
whiter and more neutral than the rest of the Televue line. This was a plus for
me since itís what I prefer to see during deep sky observations or daytime
observations while looking at terrestrial objects.
Another plus is the weight of the Ethos. Itís astonishingly light at just
one 1.25 lbs. I was amazed when I lifted it. Televue is not commenting the amount
of glass elements in the Ethos yet, but I can only guess that the glass elements
are either thin, or thereís probably less elements than we think. I canít
think of any other way it could weigh so little unless itís the housing,
so weíll just have to wait and see.
WHEN WILL THE ETHOS BECOME AVAILABLE?
I asked this same question to Televue and the response was about four months
from the time of this review. At the present time, there are only five prototypes
in existence due to slight improvements being made in each one and no price is
set yet, so youíll have to hang in there.
LETíS GET DOWN TO BUSINESS:
For the first hour during my comparison, Televue had a number of refractors on
display at RTMC. I chose the TV85 and decided to warm up my eyes using just the
13mm plossl Al brought, along with a 13mm T6 Nagler. I compared the two for about
an hour before I even went to the Ethos. I went back and forth, observing some
faint features on the Moon and a number of deep sky objects. Seeing was about
a 7 during twilight and the Moon was past first quarter but it didnít matter
since all things are relative.
I could tell the 13mm Televue plossl was a bit brighter on the Moon than the
13mm T6 Nagler. The image in the Nagler was also a bit warmer than the plossl
(I know Al wants to strangle me). Faint fuzzies looked a bit more pronounced
in the plossl, but over all, I still preferred the panoramic views of the Nagler
T6 since the axial differences on deep sky were pretty close anyway. On Venus,
I could see about 5 to 6% less light scatter in the plossl. Overall, star points
in the T6 Nagler looked sharper for most of its apparent field of view, while
the plossl is more of an axial planet killer. BTW, the T6 is also a great planetary
eyepiece as well and I highly recommend it for fast scopes. There were virtually
no internal reflections in it during any of my tests past or present.
Next came the Ethos and the target was M44 in Cancer and it was like a mural
of stars. The first thing that really struck me was how amazingly sharp it was
across the entire field in comparison to the T6 Nagler and I literally dropped
my jaw! In other words, the Ethos had a flatter area for most of its 100 degree
apparent field than the Nagler did with its 82 degree apparent field. Donít
you find that a bit ironic? This eyepiece defies logic. I came to realize that
13mmís is perfect for most refractors. I tried it in the NP127, NP101 and
102 and itís just the right focal length. Stars look like tiny pinpoints
from nearly edge too edge. The Ethos is not only going to sweep up huge star
clusters, but youíll be able to push your magnifications higher on large
galaxy fields to increase contrast and still see them all.
I also found the eye relief nice and comfortable for taking in the entire field.
It felt somewhere right between the T4 and T6 series. I personally had no problem
with my peripheral vision noticing the field-stop but I admit that I felt like
I was swimming in the cosmos with this eyepiece. We were able to gobble up huge
swaths of the night sky at once. It was actually quite entertaining to say the
Next, Al dared me to compare the axial contrast of the reputable plossl to the
Ethos on Venus. To my amazement, I could barely tell any difference in light
scatter between the two. Al was so confident about this, we even moved Venus
off axis and across the entire field of view to check for internal reflections.
I couldnít see a single one and the contrast and edge correction was simply
incredible to say the least. The pincushion distortion inherent in just about
every eyepiece was also one of the least Iíve ever seen.
On faint fuzzies, I saw little different in contrast between the plossl and the
Ethos and I had a field of view that was actually more than half the true field
of a 31mm Nagler to boot. When I went back to the T6 Nagler, it felt like I was
looking down the field stop of a plossl in comparison while the plossl felt like
I was looking down a straw.
A VISIT WITH STEVE KENNEDYíS 32Ē F-3.6:
Steve Kennedy has a reputation for making the most consistent large aperture
mirrors in the industry and I can personally attest to this. I decided to stop
by and pay Kennedy a visit since he had just completed his new 32Ē F-3.6
for display at RTMC. Now this is a really fast scope! I told Kennedy I wanted
to bring the Ethos over to check how it would cope with the inherent coma in
these really fast Newtonians. John the Televue rep, Al and myself brought the
Ethos over and there were about a dozen others. First, we wanted to test the
Ethos without the Paracorr just to get an idea of what we were dealing with here.
M13 would be the prime target for this test along with a couple of others. Like
any eyepiece in a Newt this fast, there was obvious coma around the edge but
letís be realistic. A Paracorr must be married to a scope this fast.
Next, we used the Paracorr. Al has not yet made any final decision on which setting
he feels is best for the Paracorr and Ethos combination but weíll soon
see. The Paracorr really helped clean things up and I was really amazed at how
the Ethos performed in Kennedyís Newtonian. In other words, this eyepiece
is going to be a killer in fast Newts! So you donít have to worry. This
is one of the issues I was mostly concerned about and the Ethos was fantastic.
We also had a go at M57 and a few other targets but the flatness of field was
what really impressed, not to mention great contrast to boot. I should also note
that 13mmís is going to be a fantastic for faint galaxies and globular
clusters in bigger scopes.
As I stated before, I admit that Iím not an ultrawide freak, let alone
a hyperwide freak but the Ethos is just too dang cool to pass up. Iím buying
one as soon as they become available. Darren Bly, who is my mentor on deep sky
observing visited my booth the next day and told me to put his name on a list
for one. I said, not until I get mine first, haha. The 13mm Ethos is a marvel
of engineering and a huge break through. I expect the Ethos to be one of the
hottest eyepieces this industry has ever seen and it has all the characteristics
I look for in a great eyepiece. Letís just keep our fingers crossed on
the price. Mark my word this thingís a killer!