3 Criterion Dynamax 8 scopes & B&L4000
By Mark Swanson
Let me say from the outset that all 4 of these scopes have had
mechanics. I am a visual oberver and every Dynamax 8 and the
B&L 4" have had excellent tracking. No noise, no jumping images
from tracking errors, smooth movement in dec and RA.Only one of them
had some image shift. I have seen comments on the internet that these
scopes were "poorly engineered". The Criterion Golden Pyramid tripod
has served me well on all scopes and I like the built in bubble level.
The fork mounts are not wobbly. The bakelite covered cardboard
are very durable. I have found it very easy to use the setting circles
with these scopes.
Other myths that persist about these scopes are that you
other accessories because of the threads on the back of the scope. I
have a Celestron f6.3 reducer-corrector that threads easily into the
Dynamax scopes.I also have a Celestron visual back that screws into the
back of the scope too. I have a Celestron 2" Mirror diagonal that
threads into the scope also. I have a skylight dust filter that screws
The most important thing I have to say about the optics
1979 model. I will first tell you about the 1981 model. I had this one
first and was new to the world of Cats and collimation. I used the
scope for a few years after screwing up the collimation myself and not
realizing how important it was. I sent it back to Criterion and a guy
Gilbert Violet said he would find out why it was not
make it work for me. It came back and I could not believe my eyes.This
was back in 81 when Criterion was still in business. The double double
in Lyra was incredible and my views of Jupiter and deep sky stuff the
same. I used this scope to do my Messier list and the Hershel 400 list.
Then like all people in this hobbly I got Dob fever and sold this
scope. It had wonderful optics.
About a year ago I picked up a 1976 model Dynamax 8 on A-mart.
scope has optics that can only be described as astonishing. Jupiters
red spot looks like the atmospheric storm it is . Not just a spot. I
have seen shades of white, orange, red, and brown in it. I have seen
fantastic views of the belts.Stars are the tiniest of pinpricks with
great contrast. Textbook star images.
Now the 1979 model. When I bought this on a-Mart a few years
ago I was
disappointed in the optics. I did google searches to seek help in
fixing it. I could not seem to get it collimated no matter how hard I
tried. I read something from Michael Hart on Mapug astronomy that
He said that the consistency in the manufacturing process was
good and that the difference between a great scope and a lesser scope
have to do with final assembly.Things like corrector orientation,
centering of the secondary, etc. Before I took off the retaining ring
that secures the corrector plate I determined from calipers that the
secondary was off by .5mm in an east and south direction. I took off
the ring and before I centered the secondary I rotated the correcting
plate with secondary from the factory tick mark position at 7 o'clock
to 2 o'clock. I then recentered the corrector to a rough centering. I
put the retaining ring on to line up with the holes for the screws and
kept measuring and moving until I had the secondary perfectly centered.
As it turns out the perfect center position was 70 millimeters from any
direction of the retaining ring edge to the edge of the secondary
holder. I had used new cork pieces to secure the corrector in the new
position at center and put the retaining ring back on with the screws.
I then roughly recollimated by looking through the back of the
toward the secondary and observed the "doughnut". I adjusted the
collimation screws to get it close to a perfect looking doughnut. That
night I went out and set up. I was blessed with a good seeing night.
Even before collimating when I looked into the eyepiece I knew I had
done well. I carefully recollimated and got it perfect down to a 6mm
eyepiece. I looked at Saturn and my mouth fell open in disbelief.
Incredible details and whereas before I could go no lower than an 18mm
eyepiece without the image blowing up I could get great views at 10 and
6mm. I observed bright stars and put the power to it and had fantastic
diffraction patterns. The scope maintained perfect collimation on both
sides of focus.
Be wary of bandwagon trashing of certain scopes. Take
everything with a
grain of salt.
My 1983 B&L 4" has fine optics and outperformed a
Meade 2045 in
a side by side comparison. Both 4 " scopes. The difference was in the
coatings. The B&L had better coatings. More extension on M42.
Syrtis Major showed better in the B&L as well as a polar cap.
Star clusters were brighter and sharper in the B&L than the
Update (July 28th, 2010)
It is true that the vast majority of Celestron visual backs do not thread into the Dynamax. This makes no difference and here is why. All 2" SCT diagonals with threads do thread directly into the Dynamax. My Agena Astro Skylight dust seal filter screws directly into the Dynamax and all Meade and Celestron visual backs thread into the Dust filter. My Celestron reducer-corrector f/6.3 screws directly into the Dynamax and all Meade and Celestron visual backs thread into the reducer-corrector. So, take your pick on how you want to fill your needs.