Fig 01: Sunset at the Paranal Observatory in Chile – site of the VLT’s.
Considered by many to the best location on Earth for high resolution Astronomy.
An observer, be they at a mountain top observatory,
or in their own back yard must, at all times contend with the Earth’s
atmosphere. It is a notoriously unpredictable and limiting factor in obtaining
fine views of
the Planets, and close binary stars. Many often comment, especially here
in the UK that seeing is all too often mediocre on most nights, but what
are the factors that contribute to this?. Are there ways and signs, which
indicate whether the atmosphere, will be stable or turbulent on a given night?.
What is “seeing”?
So what exactly is atmospheric seeing? - it
is high frequency temperature fluctuations of the atmosphere, and the mixing
of air “parcels” of
different temperatures/densities. This behaviour of the atmosphere is seen
at the eyepiece as a blurred, moving, or scintillating image. There are roughly
3 main areas where Atmospheric turbulence occurs. Near ground seeing
(0 – 100metres or so.) central troposphere (100m – 2km), and
High troposphere (6-12km.) Each area exhibits different characteristics,
which are explained in more detail below.
1. Lower Altitude effects.
The air near the ground is where
the great majority of turbulent airflow of the atmosphere occurs, which of
course happens to be the area where the
great majority of amateur observers are located!. This is caused mainly by
areas (houses, other building etc) of varying density radiating heat differently,
resulting in local convection currents. This is caused when the Sun heats
the ground during the day, and the heat is then radiated away at night. An
un-varying topography, such as grassy fields, and large bodies of water are
favourable to observe over, at they radiate the stored heat from the day
more slowly and equally.
Also the telescope itself can perturb the image,
if it hasn’t reached
ambient temperature, this will result in a “boiling effect” when
viewing. One should leave their scope for at least 1 hr prior to observing
and probably longer. Also certain types of telescope and observatory are
more prone to turbulence. Newtonian reflectors can be troublesome if not
properly ventilated, as can Schmidt Cassegrain’s if not left to cool
for long enough. As for observatories, Domes have poorer characteristics
for stable seeing than run of roof designs.
2. Mid- Altitude effects.
The turbulence at these altitudes
is determined largely by the topography upwind of the observing site. Hence
again, living downwind of a large city,
or densely populated area, mountain range or other very varied topography
will perturb the atmosphere. Downwind of a mountain peak will disrupt the
airflow into turbulent eddies, resulting in scintillating images. This effect
can prevail as far as 100km downwind of the peak. In this aspect, it is best
to observe where the prevailing winds across your site have travelled over
an unvarying terrain (large body of water or hills/fields for many miles
upwind of the site.) This will help produce a laminar flow, and stable images.
3. High Altitude effects.
Effects at this altitude are caused
by fast moving “rivers” of
air know as Jet streams. Wind shears at around the 200-300mb altitude level
can cause images to appear stable, but very fuzzy, and devoid of fine detail.
There isn’t anything the observer can do to prevent these effects,
but forecasts are available, to help predict weather a Jet stream is present
over your area. Areas of the Northern hemisphere most affected by the Polar
jet stream are the Central US, Canada, North Africa, and Northern Japan.
The Jet stream’s position varies with the seasons, tending to move
further South during the winter and spring months.
Where are the best locations for good seeing?.
The world’s finest locations
for a stable atmosphere are mountain top observatories, located above frequently
occurring temperature inversion layers,
where the prevailing winds have crossed many miles of ocean. Sites such as
these (La Palma, Tenerife, Hawaii, Paranal etc) frequently enjoy superb seeing
much of the year, (with measured turbulence as low as 0.11” arc seconds
occurring at times) due to a laminar flow off the ocean. Sea level locations,
on shorelines, where the prevailing winds have crossed many miles of ocean
(Florida, Caribbean Islands, Canary Islands etc) can be almost as good, and
generally very consistent and stable conditions prevail there. Also a major
factor is generally unvarying weather patterns, dominated by large anti-cyclones
(High pressure systems.) Areas outside these large high-pressure systems
have more variable weather, and are more prone to a more variable state of
Other, less well know locations where excellent stability
prevails are the Island of Madeira’s highest point (Encumeada Alta,
1800m) where seeing is better than 1” arc second 50% of the time. At
Mount Maidanak (Uzbekistan, 2600m) the median seeing value observed from
1996-2000 was just 0.69” arc
seconds, presenting a site with properties almost as good as Paranal and
Figure 02: Above are the observatories (Left) Roque De Los Muchachos
on La Palma, and (Right) Observatorio del Teide on Tenerife. Both are located
2400m above sea level, and are among the worlds finest observing locations.
Measured turbulence values at these locations is better than 1” arc
second a staggering 80% of the year. (Courtesy ENO.)
Figure 2a.jpg: Above is a diagram showing how mountains break up stable airflow
into turbulence. Note the difference in the probable views from site A (facing
into the prevailing winds off the ocean) and site B (Located on the downwind
side of the mountain peaks.)
Predicting your local seeing.
So is it possible to predict Atmospheric
seeing with any accuracy?. The answer to this is yes, most of the time.
For example poor seeing will almost
always occur after a cold front has passed over, replacing the warmer air,
with cooler air, which often gives rise to local convection, and turbulent
skies. However, preceding a cold front the air is warmer, and more stable.
This is especially true when a large High-pressure system has been present,
and mist or fog forms. At these times, transparency can be reduced, but
seeing can be excellent. It is also my experience that strong winds are
often associated with poor seeing. Another thing to look out for is what
type of clouds are present. Lots of cumulus forming in the afternoon due
to convection will probably mean seeing will be poor for several hours
after sunset. However if the winds are light, and high altitude cirrus
shows a smooth linear pattern, this often indicates that the seeing will
be good. It was also once thought that maritime locations were far from
optimal for good seeing conditions, but as we have seen earlier in the
article this is often far from the case.
An even easier way to quickly
gauge if a given night will present fine telescopic views is to simply see
how much the stars are twinkling. If
they twinkle little, and slowly, it probably indicates seeing conditions
are reasonably good. However, if they are twinkling madly its probably
a sign the views will be poor. This basic method does work quite well,
but isn’t 100% accurate. Nights when fast, high altitude turbulence
prevails will not show itself as noticeable twinkling, and one must simply
look through their telescope to see what’s happening.
Figure 03: Above is a diagram showing a cold front, and associated air
masses. The air preceding the front is older, and warmer, and generally quite
as the ground/air temperature difference is small. However, after the front
passes, the warmer air is replaced by cooler air, resulting in significant
local convection causing turbulence. Seeing wont improve until the ground/air
temperatures again equalize – this usually takes several hours.
A scale of seeing
Many scales have been devised to rate how
steady the atmosphere is on a given night. Below is one of the most popular
in use, and one I personally
This scale of seeing is the Pickering Scale, devised by Harvard
Observatory's William H. Pickering (1858-1938). Pickering used a 5-inch refractor
to devise the scale. His comments about diffraction patterns will have
be modified for larger or smaller instruments. A good starting point:
Star image is usually about twice the diameter of the third diffraction ring
if the ring could be seen; star image 13" in diameter.
p2. Image occasionally twice the diameter of the third ring (13").
p3. Image about the same diameter as the third ring (6.7"), and
brighter at the centre.
p4. The central Airy diffraction disk often visible; arcs of diffraction
rings sometimes seen on brighter stars.
p5. Airy disk always visible; arcs frequently seen on brighter stars.
p6. Airy disk always visible; short arcs constantly seen.
p7. Disk sometimes sharply defined; diffraction rings seen as long
arcs or complete circles.
p8. Disk always sharply defined rings seen as long arcs or complete
circles, but always in motion.
p9. The inner diffraction ring is stationary. Outer rings momentarily
p10. The complete diffraction pattern is stationary.
Note: On this scale
1-2 is very poor, 3-4 is poor, 5 is fair, 6-7 is good, 7-8 very good,
and 8-10 excellent.
Atmospheric seeing within the UK and USA – good or bad?.
I have mentioned, the local geography of a location plays a major part
on how steady the seeing will be. In the United States, certain
are in general much more favourable than others. The best states are
in General those close to the Southeastern side of the continent. In
(the eastern sea-board especially) from Miami to Key West enjoys stable
seeing throughout the year due to its consistent high pressure systems,
laminar flow off the Ocean/Gulf of Mexico, and temperature inversions
that form close to the eastern coasts. Average seeing here has been
reported to be better than 1” arc second most of the year. Other
good locations are the Gulf coast, and Arizona. The more northerly US
states toward the
Canadian border often have poorer seeing due to the frequent presence
of the Polar Jet stream.
As for the United Kingdom, over the last 3-4
years I have paid particular attention to how the seeing has behaved
at my own location, which was
in Kings Lynn Norfolk until Dec 01, and now Rochester, Kent (both in
East of the country).
Seeing at the Kings Lynn site (located on a balcony, around 3 miles
from the North Sea coast, and 30ft above ground level) proved quite
during the 1998 to 2001 period. At Rochester, Kent (Near the
South East Coast of the Country) at about 100m altitude presented quite
good seeing during 2002.
But what about the North of the UK?. Having
received reports from experienced planetary observers, it does seem
the seeing further North is less
stable, and frequently poor at times, so it does seem the more stable
located further South, where the weather is better. Also, the seeing
the seasons in the UK, with. The best seeing occurring in summer months,
and worst occurring in winter.
between June- Nov 1999:
(35%) 12 nights were of Pickering rating 4 or less (poor.)
21 nights were of Pickering rating 5 or better (fair - excellent.)
nights were of Pickering rating 7 or better (good - excellent.)
27 nights between July 00 – Feb 01:
(18%) 5 nights were
of Pickering 4 rating or less (poor.)
(81%) 22 nights were of Pickering
5 rating or better (fair – excellent.)
(33%) 9 nights were of Pickering
7 rating or better (good - excellent.)
23 nights between Jan 02 – April 02 (Rochester,
(13%) 3 nights were of Pickering rating 4 or less (poor.)
20 nights were of Pickering rating 5 or better (fair – excellent.)
(39%) 9 nights were of Pickering rating 7 or better (good – excellent.)
Fig 04: Above is a chart showing the observed conditions at my observing
sites over 3 Jupiter apparitions.
The results show sites with reasonably good stability. The
data revealed the best seeing usually occurs during July-October,
with the poorest seeing occurring during December, but again improving
worth noting that the best seeing occurred during
periods when the weather was more settled for a few days, which rarely occurs
Nights of high humidity were often good (as many
say) but not all. Seeing was always good when any fog/mist was
Fig 05. A drawing of Jupiter by the author, simulated to show 3 different
views as a high quality 25 cm reflector would show the Planet at powers of
350x. (far left) under excellent seeing, (centre) under fair seeing, and
(far right) very poor seeing.
Catching that great night.
For many observers,
it will be a matter of patience before that night of great seeing occurs,
and I advise the observer to not miss nights that
may present the right meteorological conditions as I’ve described. When
it does, it’s a memorable experience. Under these conditions
(provided the scope is of good quality, and properly collimated) one
the amazing capabilities of the amateur telescope. The smallest details
become visible on the disk of Jupiter, with an intricate maze of colourful
detail presenting itself. Saturn’s often mostly featureless disk,
suddenly transforms into a planet of fine belts and zones, with wonderful
colours visible in larger telescopes. But the Planets aren’t
the only objects, which will captivate the observer. Globular clusters,
close binary stars appear as sharp as is possible, with almost 3-D
Above all though, make sure you enjoy the experience, as it
happen very often. Many will perhaps only get a couple of nights during
the whole year with such conditions, whilst others in favored locations
will have many. Either way, it helps us all to appreciate the universe
in which we live just that little bit more clearly.