Review- Printing Astro photos on Metal with Bay...
Apr 16 2015 02:36 PM by ScenicCityPhoto
16” F/4.5 Teeter Stark Review
Apr 15 2015 02:46 PM by donsell
Vixen Ascot Super Wide 10x50 Binocular Review
Apr 15 2015 11:02 AM by jvandyke
Mar 21 2015 11:54 AM by Gil V
Categories See All →
- CN Reports
- User Reviews
- How to . . .
- Observing Skills
- Astronomical History
- Optical Theory
- Vision and Related Experiments
- How to Gain the Support of your Family for your Astronomical Pursuits
- Evaluation Tips
- Special Events
- The Elements
- New Articles in [!monthname!]
- Telescope Articles
- Submit a Review / Article
- Monthly Guides
- Behind the Scenes
- About Us
- Copyright ©
- Terms & Conditions
- Tiny Eyes on the Skies
- From the Editor's Desk
- What's Up . . .
- The Light Cup Journals
- Who is this Super Light Cup?
- Cloudy Nights T-Shirts
- Imaging Contest
- Small Wonders
- Previous Imaging Contest Winners
- This Month's Skies
- Mike's Corner
- The Cloudy Nights Friends and Family Discount
- Uncle Rod's Astro Blog
- Fishing for Photons
- Binocular Universe
- Article Submissions
Binocular Universe: Songs of the Deep South
Voice your opinion about this subject in our forums
Songs of the
This month, we're taking a sabbatical from northern
and heading to the deep south, where we will visit the finest globular
cluster in the entire sky. Which
cluster has earned that coveted title? Some
would argue 47 Tucanae, while others would say M13 in Hercules or
in Sagittarius. While they are all
wonderful sights, there is only one king of the globulars, to my eyes
Above: Spring star map from Star Watch by Phil Harrington.
Above: Finder chart for this month's Binocular Universe. Chart adapted from Touring the Universe through Binoculars Atlas (TUBA)
is bright enough to be visible to the naked eye as a faint star-like
within the lopsided hexagonal body of the Centaur.
In fact, it was thought to be just that -- just another faint
before the invention of the telescope. Ptolemy
listed it as such in his Almagest catalog of 140 AD, while
assigned it the Greek letter Omega (ù)
in his monumental Uranometria atlas of 1603.
wasn't until nearly seven decades after the invention of the telescope
true nature was revealed. In 1677,
Edmund Halley, most famous for his work on and predictions concerning
that bears his name, became the first to see Omega Centauri's true
that it's not just one star, but rather a huge swarm of them.
Halley, apparently a man of few words, described this
as merely a "luminous spot or patch."
estimates tell us that Halley's patch contains several million stars,
any of the other 150 globular clusters in the Milky Way's family.
Those millions of stars are all crammed into a spherical area no
than 150 light years across, which means that the density inside
Omega's core is
about 180 stars per cubic light year. That's
about 80,000 times higher than the rural surroundings that the Sun
Astronomers place Omega Centauri at 15,800 light years away,
makes it one of the closest of its kind.
two factors -- size and distance -- work together to create a grand
binoculars and telescopes alike. While
a telescope's higher magnification will resolved Omega to its core,
around the fringes can be spotted with as little as 11-power.
In fact, even 7-power binoculars show a "not-quite-resolved"
graininess to the cluster.
binoculars clearly show that Omega is not uniformly round, like most
globulars. Instead, it's
surprisingly oval, or oblate. This
effect is due to centripetal force generated by the cluster's rate of
similar to what causes Jupiter to flatten at its poles and bulge at its
of the instrument used to spot it, your first trip to Omega Centauri
remembered for a lifetime. I fondly
recall my first encounter way back in 1986, when my family and I had
the Florida Everglades, ironically to see Halley's Comet (and
Omega is theoretically visible from as far north as the latitude of
Left: The author made this sketch of Omega Centauri through 11x80 binoculars back in 1986.
North is up.
If Omega is a little too far south for you,
head 5° north and try your luck with a
galactic enigma. On
Dunlop's riddle is now known as NGC 5128, a fascinating galaxy that’s also known as the radio source Centaurus A for its strong emissions. When we look at NGC 5128, we are looking at a case of galactic cannibalism. Inside the heart of this huge elliptical galaxy lies a massive black hole that is consuming a smaller spiral galaxy. The two are believed to have collided between 160 and 500 million years ago.
Your binoculars won't detect any of the internal strife that NGC 5128 is enduring, but they can show you this intergalactic train wreck that continues to fascinate astronomers. That is, if you can see the galaxy at all. It never rises more than 7° above my own horizon here on Long Island. That’s better than Omega Centauri, but not by much. If you’re further north, its maximum altitude shrinks. Of course, travel southward and NGC 5128 will climb higher in the sky.
As luck would have it, the bright star Spica [Alpha (á) Virginis] has nearly the same right ascension as both NGC 5128 and Omega Centauri, so we can use it as a gauge for when both are at culmination.
If NGC 5128 is still too far south, you'll notice that we have M83 on the top edge of this month’s finder chart, as well. Even with a clear view, however, finding it can take some extra effort. But if you follow these steps, you should spot it the first time out. Again starting from Spica, head south 12°, or roughly two binocular fields, to 3rd-magnitude Gamma (ã) Hydrae. Swing to Gamma's southeast and keep an eye out for a right triangle of stars resembling a deformed arrowhead. M83 lies just to the south of the arrowhead's eastern tip.
M83 is visible through nearly all binoculars as a bright stellar point surrounded by the soft glow of its spiral arms. Many amateurs seem to ignore M83 because of its out-of-the-way location, but don't you make the same mistake. In fact, thanks to the attractive star field created by that crooked arrowhead, it's become one of my favorite spring binocular targets.
Before we close this month, many readers have asked me to include some viewing tips from time to time in this column. I think that's a great idea, and would like to begin with a basic one: how to hold binoculars by hand. That sounds easy enough, but there is a right way and a wrong way. A few years ago, Robert Andrews from Lonetree, Colorado, sent me the following tip. "While in the Navy, I was taught to hold them cradling the sides of the barrels in my fingers with the hands open, and rest the extended thumbs on my cheeks or the side of my face. This results in much more stability." This is a slightly different technique than I'm used to, but I tested it for myself and found that it works well. Give it a try for yourself.
Have a favorite binocular tip or trick? Send them to me, either by posting them to this column's discussion forum or using the e-mail link at the top of this article, and I'll try to include them in a future column.
Meanwhile, here are few more southern targets within this month’s Binocular Universe.
Until we meet
month under the stars, remember that two eyes are better than one.
About the Author:
Phil Harrington is the author of nine books on astronomy, including Star Ware and Star Watch. Visit his web site at www.philharrington.net .
|Phil Harrington's Binocular Universe is copyright 2013 by Philip S. Harrington. All rights reserved. No reproduction, in whole or in part, beyond single copies for use by an individual, is permitted without written permission of the copyright holder.|