Jump to content


Photo

CG-5 or HEQ5 for unguided photography?

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
4 replies to this topic

#1 m00nless

m00nless

    Messenger

  • -----
  • Posts: 470
  • Joined: 06 Aug 2008

Posted 23 March 2009 - 10:14 AM

For short duration unguided photography using either a telephoto lens or a fast refractor which of the two mounts is more accurate?

#2 waassaabee

waassaabee

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • *****
  • Posts: 5149
  • Joined: 26 Nov 2007

Posted 23 March 2009 - 02:50 PM

You will get very good results with a CG5-ASGT.

#3 m00nless

m00nless

    Messenger

  • -----
  • Posts: 470
  • Joined: 06 Aug 2008

Posted 27 March 2009 - 11:06 AM

Is the CG5-ASGT really a better mount than the Sky-Watcher HEQ5 (SYNTREK or PRO SkyScan)

#4 waassaabee

waassaabee

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • *****
  • Posts: 5149
  • Joined: 26 Nov 2007

Posted 27 March 2009 - 11:42 AM

I've only used the CG5, but I like it's dead on Goto's, ease of setup and alignments, hand controls intuitive interface and updateable firmware, rock solid tripod, and built in ST-4 autoguide port. Even the coffee grinder sound grows on you after a while...

#5 vegasMike

vegasMike

    Viking 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 646
  • Joined: 24 May 2004

Posted 27 March 2009 - 11:49 AM

IIRC - HEQ5 has a higher factory stated resolution (arcseconds) than the ASGT while maintaining near the same gear ratio and nearly double the microsteps. It may come down to just a higher resolution encoder/electronics package. I cannot support this claim as I dont have the bookmark website handy.

Of course your mileage may vary.






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics