cheap binocular mount
Posted 02 March 2010 - 12:44 PM
Posted 02 March 2010 - 01:45 PM
Posted 02 March 2010 - 02:31 PM
Posted 12 May 2010 - 11:38 AM
Posted 12 May 2010 - 02:24 PM
There really are no cheap, or simple, options for mounting a pair of terrestrial binoculars for celestial viewing once you go beyond the simple photo tripod mount.
Parallelogram mounts are neither cheap nor easy to move and they still require a mount for the parallelogram. There are other solutions available but they don't really improve on the cost or practicability when compared to a parallelogram.
Therein (IMO) lies the problem with using binocs for serious observing. Unless you're willing to spring for purpose built astronomical binoculars (having 45 or 90 degree diagonal eyepieces), standard binocs mounted on a tripod don't work at all well for looking at the sky.
You're far better off lying down on a pad or chaise and finding a way to brace your elbows on something when the binoculars are held to your eyes.
Posted 12 May 2010 - 09:54 PM
The best thing about this approach would be that as you rolled your head L-R or up-down, the binos would stay aligned with your eyes. The helmet would take all the weight of the binos.
I hope somebody tries this and reports on the results.
Posted 13 May 2010 - 05:46 AM
My grandfather recently purchased Celestron Skymaster 8x56 binoculars and a mounting adapter, so I'm on a mission to find an inexpensive mount for him. Most viewing will be terrestrial, with some occasional astronomy. Am I best to just look for a used camera tripod? It needs to have a 1/4" mounting screw, which I can only assume is standard on many tripods. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Well, contrary to some comments above, I would reccommend a simple stable tripod for easy viewing.
You won't need to lie back in a reclining chair, although that is certainly and option. With an 8x56 binocular if you choose to try the reclining chair, you won't need any mount at all.
For mostly terrestrail viewing, the tripod need not be very tall, but for astro viewing you will find out soon enough that the best choice of tripod is one that can crank up atleast to be about 4" to 6" taller than the person using it to view. That helps prevent crouching down to get under the eyepieces.
I've been viewing with dozens of different binocular/tripod combinations for many years and have not needed to go to 45° or 90° eyepieces. Straight thru works fine. Not saying I wouldn't gain some comfort, just saying I don't need to do that. I've got 10 different mounts I can choose for any one of 25 different binoculars, and more often than any other method I choose a straight up tripod and straight thru binoculars.
At this point a parallelogram is probably a lot more to deal with than is necessary. And way more expensive.
These binoculars are very light. Nearly any tripod will do. One good tripod is the Orion Paragon HD-F2, the cheaper of the two Paragons. It's actually just a bit taller than the more expensive one, a little over 6' with the center column fully extended.
Sunpak model 777 is fairly tall and stable and under $100.
Slik makes some good models under $100, just pay attention to max height. But to get the 6' height you may need to go to the Slik Pro 700 over $100.
Bogen tripods are very good, but too expensive for you. Best cheapest combo would be the 3130 (?126RC)head on a 3011 tripod and this would run you about $175.
'Tripods without center columns are NOT a good choice.
Don't overlook the possibility of a $69 monopod. It might just appeal to him. The only problem ios you can't set up poiont to an object and then show someone else what you are looking at. But light weight, tall, cheap and convienient are all achieved. A monopod can be used as an extended brace when lying down in a recliner.
Posted 13 May 2010 - 10:33 AM