Jump to content


Photo

11" EdgeHD to heavy for CGEM?

  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 mistyridge

mistyridge

    Gemini

  • *****
  • Posts: 3036
  • Joined: 28 Oct 2005
  • Loc: Loomis, CA

Posted 01 August 2010 - 12:03 AM

Is the 11" EdgeHD to heavy for the CGEM if it is to be used for video imaging. The cameras are not much heavier that sme EPs.

#2 Stew57

Stew57

    Mercury-Atlas

  • *****
  • Posts: 2552
  • Joined: 03 May 2009
  • Loc: Silsbee Texas

Posted 01 August 2010 - 12:35 AM

That is what I am using now. Makes for the max portable mount scope combo to me.

#3 Lane

Lane

    Soyuz

  • -----
  • Posts: 3593
  • Joined: 19 Nov 2007
  • Loc: Frisco, Texas

Posted 01 August 2010 - 01:34 AM

I don't image, but I use a side by side plate with a C11 and AT106 on my CGEM all the time and it is fairly stable as long as it is not windy. That is probably a lot more weight than a C11 and a camera.

#4 mistyridge

mistyridge

    Gemini

  • *****
  • Posts: 3036
  • Joined: 28 Oct 2005
  • Loc: Loomis, CA

Posted 01 August 2010 - 09:30 AM

Thanks. I was trying to decide between the 9.25" and 11".

#5 nemo129

nemo129

    Gemini

  • *****
  • Posts: 3115
  • Joined: 03 Jan 2010
  • Loc: WMass

Posted 01 August 2010 - 07:15 PM

Does that mean aperture won? 11"? :grin:

#6 mistyridge

mistyridge

    Gemini

  • *****
  • Posts: 3036
  • Joined: 28 Oct 2005
  • Loc: Loomis, CA

Posted 02 August 2010 - 12:14 AM

Aperture is king.

#7 edl

edl

    Viking 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 605
  • Joined: 24 Jun 2004

Posted 02 August 2010 - 06:26 AM

That is for sure! Aperture is King.
But the 9.25 is no slouch. :grin:






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics