Jump to content

  •  

CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.

Photo

Favorite used telescope ad

  • Please log in to reply
1987 replies to this topic

#1926 Joe1950

Joe1950

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1278
  • Joined: 22 Aug 2015
  • Loc: NJ

Posted 22 January 2016 - 10:43 PM

With that eyepiece/prism/barlow arrangement, you can have the scope outside and view while inside. Good for us cold climate observers. :coldday:


  • Orogeneza likes this

#1927 TCW

TCW

    Skylab

  • *****
  • Posts: 4336
  • Joined: 05 Nov 2013

Posted 26 January 2016 - 10:23 PM

Bosh and Loud --- https://phoenix.crai...5396508654.html



#1928 Joe1950

Joe1950

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1278
  • Joined: 22 Aug 2015
  • Loc: NJ

Posted 26 January 2016 - 10:50 PM

That musta have been quite a dust storm there in Phoenix.


  • Orogeneza likes this

#1929 PaulEK

PaulEK

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1306
  • Joined: 25 May 2008
  • Loc: Wisconsin

Posted 27 January 2016 - 11:42 PM

Yeah, I just don't get folks like that: less than one minute with a dust cloth would make it look so much nicer, which would mean quicker and more offers. It's like they don't want it to sell.


  • Joe1950 likes this

#1930 PaulEK

PaulEK

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1306
  • Joined: 25 May 2008
  • Loc: Wisconsin

Posted 27 January 2016 - 11:42 PM

Of course, the lack of concern about spelling is even harder to fathom.


  • MCovington and Joe1950 like this

#1931 TOM KIEHL

TOM KIEHL

    Mercury-Atlas

  • *****
  • Posts: 2699
  • Joined: 17 Nov 2012

Posted 28 January 2016 - 11:32 PM

OH MY ! :nonono:

" It's old and ugly but is fully functional. I removed some unnecessary material to lighten it up."

 

LINK


  • sgorton99 likes this

#1932 TSSClay

TSSClay

    Vostok 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 196
  • Joined: 22 Oct 2013
  • Loc: Manchester MI

Posted 29 January 2016 - 08:13 AM

It looks like some of the unnecessary material removed was the main mirror!!! :shocked: :shocked:  That would lighten it up!  Edit - I should look at all the pictures - the mirror is in a box separate.

 

Too bad - that is only a couple of miles from where I work.

 

Clay


Edited by TSSClay, 29 January 2016 - 08:14 AM.

  • TOM KIEHL likes this

#1933 TOM KIEHL

TOM KIEHL

    Mercury-Atlas

  • *****
  • Posts: 2699
  • Joined: 17 Nov 2012

Posted 29 January 2016 - 09:01 AM

If the glass is any good  , the mirrors could be good candidates for a truss project . The rest is Fire Wood . :ohmy:  



#1934 BigC

BigC

    Aurora

  • *****
  • Posts: 4558
  • Joined: 29 Sep 2010
  • Loc: SE Indiana

Posted 29 January 2016 - 09:13 AM

I see nothing wrong with the cut-outs;quite like much construction seen in industry.If it REALLY bothers  then the holes can be covered with thin,lightweight material.The Coulters weren't sold on beauty of packaging but as affordable light buckets at a time most hobbyists couldn't afford big scopes.I buy it if closer and Dobs of similar and larger weren't already in my possession.



#1935 BigC

BigC

    Aurora

  • *****
  • Posts: 4558
  • Joined: 29 Sep 2010
  • Loc: SE Indiana

Posted 29 January 2016 - 09:18 AM

Of course, the lack of concern about spelling is even harder to fathom.

I'll bet "auto-correct" did its dirty work again..My phone will show the message as I wrote it but send a "corrected" version on pressing send!Guaranteed to make the sender look like an idiot by radically changing a message.I discovered you must add any unusual words to the system dictionary in order to prevent this. My previous phone allowed turning off the auto-spell and auto-suggest but haven't found how in my new one.(Moto E).



#1936 Ben H

Ben H

    Ranger 4

  • -----
  • Posts: 306
  • Joined: 12 Jun 2012

Posted 29 January 2016 - 02:54 PM

I see nothing wrong with the cut-outs;quite like much construction seen in industry.If it REALLY bothers  then the holes can be covered with thin,lightweight material.The Coulters weren't sold on beauty of packaging but as affordable light buckets at a time most hobbyists couldn't afford big scopes.I buy it if closer and Dobs of similar and larger weren't already in my possession.


Tubes are funny things. Even when using relatively flexible materials, like cardboard, they are able to maintain their rigidity due to the way forces are naturally balanced. When you start cutting holes, especially GREAT BIG MURTHERING HOLES as seen above you compromise much of that rigidity allowing the tube to flex. 

Now, I'm sure you're thinking in your head that this isn't much different in practice than a truss telescope, but please note no one uses 1/2" thick cardboard trusses! I strongly suspect in testing you would find the collimation changes significantly not only between zenith and horizon, but even over changes of 15 degrees in altitude. 


  • TOM KIEHL likes this

#1937 Joe1950

Joe1950

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1278
  • Joined: 22 Aug 2015
  • Loc: NJ

Posted 29 January 2016 - 05:23 PM

Here is a CELESTRONE Scope that must have been used with some very, very heavy eyepieces.

 

https://philadelphia...5416782473.html


  • PaulEK and TOM KIEHL like this

#1938 TOM KIEHL

TOM KIEHL

    Mercury-Atlas

  • *****
  • Posts: 2699
  • Joined: 17 Nov 2012

Posted 30 January 2016 - 12:18 AM

Here is a CELESTRONE Scope that must have been used with some very, very heavy eyepieces.

 

https://philadelphia...5416782473.html

It's a Italian  version  Celestron


  • DMala and Joe1950 like this

#1939 BigC

BigC

    Aurora

  • *****
  • Posts: 4558
  • Joined: 29 Sep 2010
  • Loc: SE Indiana

Posted 30 January 2016 - 05:49 AM

 

I see nothing wrong with the cut-outs;quite like much construction seen in industry.If it REALLY bothers  then the holes can be covered with thin,lightweight material.The Coulters weren't sold on beauty of packaging but as affordable light buckets at a time most hobbyists couldn't afford big scopes.I buy it if closer and Dobs of similar and larger weren't already in my possession.

Tubes are funny things. Even when using relatively flexible materials, like cardboard, they are able to maintain their rigidity due to the way forces are naturally balanced. When you start cutting holes, especially GREAT BIG MURTHERING HOLES as seen above you compromise much of that rigidity allowing the tube to flex. 

Now, I'm sure you're thinking in your head that this isn't much different in practice than a truss telescope, but please note no one uses 1/2" thick cardboard trusses! I strongly suspect in testing you would find the collimation changes significantly not only between zenith and horizon, but even over changes of 15 degrees in altitude. 

 

Cardboard or particle board;there is a difference.Square tube  versus round tube,cutouts will affect each differently.I would like to see an engineering analysis and/or actual use of the scope in question to reveal sag and collimation changes.The owner does claim it works post modification.I know I have been shocked by how much material can be removed from a structure yet still support its steady-state load.The trick is knowing when to stop!Some excessive reductions leave no safety margin.Such an analysis was likely never done by Coulter since the emphasis was lowest cost.Doing the cutouts would also have added labor and tool expense plus increased production time,all which push up product prices.


  • Joe1950 likes this

#1940 BigC

BigC

    Aurora

  • *****
  • Posts: 4558
  • Joined: 29 Sep 2010
  • Loc: SE Indiana

Posted 05 February 2016 - 04:40 AM

http://www.ebay.com/...#item2ca826a5cf



#1941 TCW

TCW

    Skylab

  • *****
  • Posts: 4336
  • Joined: 05 Nov 2013

Posted 17 February 2016 - 11:15 PM

Classic -  https://phoenix.crai...5450754359.html



#1942 sgorton99

sgorton99

    Soyuz

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 3729
  • Joined: 30 Apr 2008
  • Loc: Wisconsin, Madison

Posted 18 February 2016 - 08:36 PM

Jason telescope. Or is it a moose?

 

http://www.ebay.com/...a8AAOSwnLdWs5Gp



#1943 Joe1950

Joe1950

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1278
  • Joined: 22 Aug 2015
  • Loc: NJ

Posted 20 February 2016 - 03:50 PM

I'd be leery of a scope showing the photo of a moose. Unless the moose posted the ad.


  • terraclarke and Dartguy like this

#1944 Joe1950

Joe1950

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1278
  • Joined: 22 Aug 2015
  • Loc: NJ

Posted 23 February 2016 - 01:25 PM

Here is a scope that has a 45 minute vibration dampening time:

 

https://cnj.craigsli...5393114406.html

 

 

And this is one of my favorites:

 

"the telescope itself is dented and can't see anything through the eye piece and there is a broken strap .... other than. that it's perfect.

 

https://cnj.craigsli...5432674176.html

 

A true optimist!

 

Notice when something is damaged the neighbor's dog is always to blame?


Edited by Joe1950, 23 February 2016 - 01:26 PM.

  • terraclarke, TCW and Dartguy like this

#1945 orion61

orion61

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • *****
  • Posts: 6424
  • Joined: 20 Oct 2007
  • Loc: Birthplace James T Kirk

Posted 25 February 2016 - 04:44 PM

Here is a CELESTRONE Scope that must have been used with some very, very heavy eyepieces.

 

https://philadelphia...5416782473.html

Reminds me of the Little Caesars "Moon Gazing" Commercial.


  • terraclarke and Joe1950 like this

#1946 scopeboy42

scopeboy42

    Viking 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 544
  • Joined: 06 Mar 2006
  • Loc: Garner, NC USA

Posted 27 February 2016 - 06:20 PM

Who knew Abercrombie and Fitch sold such expensive telescopes.

 

http://www.ebay.com/...FMAAOSwL7VWtAeJ


Edited by scopeboy42, 27 February 2016 - 06:20 PM.

  • sgorton99 likes this

#1947 mikey cee

mikey cee

    Cosmos

  • *****
  • Posts: 9423
  • Joined: 18 Jan 2007
  • Loc: bellevue ne.

Posted 27 February 2016 - 07:26 PM

Well it's not my fault you're behind a door on why these scopes can command this kind of price. That mount has to be worth at least $500-$700 easy! Look at all that material and workmanship in there. Why it's even hand powered to boot.  :smirk:  Mike



#1948 DreamWeaver

DreamWeaver

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1138
  • Joined: 30 Dec 2008
  • Loc: Tucson, AZ

Posted 27 February 2016 - 07:35 PM

I think his wife told him he had to sell his telescopes.  It's not his fault that no one wants to buy them.   :lol:



#1949 Joe1950

Joe1950

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1278
  • Joined: 22 Aug 2015
  • Loc: NJ

Posted 27 February 2016 - 07:58 PM

Sad thing is some unknowing buyer might think it's a bargain and buy it.

 

I see scopes and ham radios on there listed used for two to three times what the new product is!

 

I know, caveat emptor. But it is typical that some people have no conscious at all when it comes to money. :ohgeeze:  

 

 

ADDED: Listed below it there are two very similar scopes, if not the same, one for $75 and one for $299.99!

 

What a zoo.


Edited by Joe1950, 28 February 2016 - 09:43 AM.


#1950 BigC

BigC

    Aurora

  • *****
  • Posts: 4558
  • Joined: 29 Sep 2010
  • Loc: SE Indiana

Posted 28 February 2016 - 09:52 AM

Who knew Abercrombie and Fitch sold such expensive telescopes.

 

http://www.ebay.com/...FMAAOSwL7VWtAeJ

I think it was listed a couple weeks ago for $3,000 !

i GOT A BARGAIN AS MINE WAS ONLY $40 WITH SHIPPING SEVERAL YEARS PAST!




CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.







Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics