Jump to content


Photo

Buy a CGEM or wait for the CGEM DX

  • Please log in to reply
26 replies to this topic

#26 dhaval

dhaval

    Viking 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 514
  • Joined: 21 Jul 2008
  • Loc: Round Rock, TX

Posted 01 February 2011 - 06:56 PM

There's a thread, a long thread on it on CN.


That is a long thread indeed - 34 pages. I wonder if they are ever going to make it an official review, surely deserves to be one.


Bottom-line? It's a nice mount if you need light weight. It will not equal the Atlas for payload or certainly the CGEM DX.


Looking at the specs of the mount, it is rated at 45lbs - that is closer to the Atlas mount. That being said, the weight of the mount itself is 20lbs - a light weight mount that holds much - if something like that is possible!

All in all, it looks like a good mount and a decent buy (based on the long thread that's going on out there).

Dhaval

#27 NewAstronomer

NewAstronomer

    Soyuz

  • *****
  • Posts: 3909
  • Joined: 03 Sep 2004
  • Loc: Northeast, PA U.S.A

Posted 01 February 2011 - 09:16 PM

The Eq45 looks veeery interesting...need to see reviews of other samples, but that single review (great thread) makes it promising.






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics