Jump to content


Photo

The Magnificent Meade 127ED

  • Please log in to reply
21 replies to this topic

#1 Olivier Biot

Olivier Biot

    Amused

  • *****
  • Posts: 24946
  • Joined: 25 Apr 2005
  • Loc: 51°N (Belgium)

Posted 06 December 2011 - 04:25 PM

The Magnificent Meade 127ED - A fresh look at an old 'scope

By Neil English.

#2 Jeff Morgan

Jeff Morgan

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • *****
  • Posts: 5693
  • Joined: 28 Sep 2003
  • Loc: Prescott, AZ

Posted 06 December 2011 - 08:55 PM

A delightful read Neil!

As the owner of an Astro-Physics STAR12, I can confirm your observations on the excellent combination of aperture and weight of the old visual doublets. They really do check all the boxes.

Given the discount the Meades take on the used market, they could be the best bargain out there for the visual astronomer.

#3 Scott in NC

Scott in NC

    80mm Refractor Fanatic

  • *****
  • Administrators
  • Posts: 15701
  • Joined: 05 Mar 2005
  • Loc: NC

Posted 06 December 2011 - 09:20 PM

Great article, Neil--thanks for sharing!

#4 hfjacinto

hfjacinto

    I think he's got it!

  • *****
  • Posts: 11810
  • Joined: 12 Jan 2009
  • Loc: Land of clouds and LP

Posted 06 December 2011 - 10:27 PM

Neil, great article, have you compared this scope to the 120 EDs from Orion and Skywatcher?

#5 jrbarnett

jrbarnett

    Eyepiece Hooligan

  • *****
  • Posts: 20320
  • Joined: 28 Feb 2006
  • Loc: Petaluma, CA

Posted 07 December 2011 - 12:23 AM

Beautiful piece, Neil.

I too had a 127ED.

One of the best ED doublets I've ever used.

The aperture, also, is just enough bigger than a 4-incher that you know it.

One of my fondest sessions with the scope was at Cobb Mountain in Lake County, California. The 127ED was performing flawlessly. The entire loop of the Veil was easily visible with direct vision, unfiltered. The Pleiades were thick with nebulosity.

That's when I learned that 5-inches of excellent quality under dark transparent skies is very workable deep sky aperture.

A quick cooler too.

Regards,

Jim

#6 gdd

gdd

    Apollo

  • -----
  • Posts: 1458
  • Joined: 23 Nov 2005
  • Loc: Lynnwood, WA (N/O Seattle)

Posted 07 December 2011 - 01:17 AM

Are any of the Meade scopes or optics still made at Irvine?

Gale

#7 Doug Culbertson

Doug Culbertson

    Skylab

  • *****
  • Posts: 4117
  • Joined: 06 Jan 2005

Posted 07 December 2011 - 11:03 AM

Neil,

Great review! I have been observing with a Meade 127ED for about two years now, and have enjoyed it about as much as any telescope that I have ever owned. For reference, I have also owned an Astro-Physics 130 f/8.35 as well as a Takahashi FS128.

While I wouldn't dare say that the Meade is of the same quality as the A-P, in the bang for buck category it's a clear winner.

I have seen a couple of the 127EDs on Astromart lately, and at very good prices. I was surprised to see them going unsold for so long.

#8 jrbarnett

jrbarnett

    Eyepiece Hooligan

  • *****
  • Posts: 20320
  • Joined: 28 Feb 2006
  • Loc: Petaluma, CA

Posted 07 December 2011 - 02:35 PM

Newp.

Mexico or China.

- Jim

#9 John Huntley

John Huntley

    Viking 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 944
  • Joined: 16 Jul 2006
  • Loc: South West England

Posted 07 December 2011 - 07:54 PM

Great report Neil - thanks for posting it.

I can recall seeing the Meade ED range back in the early 1990's in Telescope House in London, then the home of Broadhurst Clarkson and Fuller. At one point they even had a 7" on display - a massive affair on a mount to match !.

For visual use I love the ED doublet refractors although the two I have would probably be a bit on the fast side for your tastes - a Skywatcher ED120 Pro and a Vixen ED102SS.

Thanks again for the interesting article.

#10 vct123

vct123

    Ranger 4

  • *****
  • Posts: 331
  • Joined: 17 Nov 2009
  • Loc: Staten Island, N.Y.

Posted 07 December 2011 - 09:03 PM

I have just picked up a Meade 127ed doublet. For under $1,000 I could not justify spending so much more for the likes of an ES 127 triplet or something similar.
Its in beautiful condition, even came with the factory
big blue and white box. The scope and front lens are
spotless. I played around with the stock focuser and it seems
very smooth, better then I expected. It has done nothing but rain since I received the scope, if it performs as good as it looks, I will be happy. I had a Sky-watcher pro-gold 120ed and was not very happy with the views. Hopefully this scope will be better.

#11 StarStuff1

StarStuff1

    Soyuz

  • *****
  • Posts: 3875
  • Joined: 01 Apr 2007
  • Loc: South of the Mason-Dixon Line

Posted 08 December 2011 - 04:35 PM

Way back in 1991 I ordered this scope with the GoTo EQ mount . It took forever to get it! But, man, what a scope!!!The images of Mars alone were nearly unbelievable. Unfortunately, my wife and I bought another house and the re-modeling costs forced me to sell the Meade. I did not miss the mount at all. It was a piece of *BLEEP*. But the lens...so nice!

#12 astroneil

astroneil

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1806
  • Joined: 28 Jul 2009
  • Loc: res publica caledoniae

Posted 09 December 2011 - 08:19 AM

Hello everyone,

Thank you very much for your feedback and comments.:rainbow:

With best wishes,

Neil. ;)

#13 ukcanuck

ukcanuck

    Vendor (Skylight Telescopes)

  • *****
  • Vendors
  • Posts: 1411
  • Joined: 07 Nov 2006
  • Loc: London, UK

Posted 13 December 2011 - 04:11 PM

Hi Neil,

A very nice bit of writing, thanks for taking the time.

Also interesting to see how quickly the number of views on this article went up. It was pointed out to me by a friend who is not actually a CN user who agreed with your summary 100%... :)

#14 astroneil

astroneil

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1806
  • Joined: 28 Jul 2009
  • Loc: res publica caledoniae

Posted 14 December 2011 - 07:54 AM

Thank you Richard; appreciate the feedback.

Still enjoying that telescope. Indeed I derive great pleasure in knowing that it's not quite an Apo.

I call it an ALMO i.e. ALMost an apO. :lol:

The world needs more ALMOs that's for sure. :lol:

Under 4inch aperture; not cost effective.

Between 5-8" f/9 ALMO doublets. :idea:

Hmmmm......... :hmmmm:

Seems no one is willing to take up the challenge. I guess they're all too busy trying to flog triplets to the visual guys to maximise profit margins. Scandalous!! :lol:

Season's Greetings

Neil. ;)

#15 astroneil

astroneil

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1806
  • Joined: 28 Jul 2009
  • Loc: res publica caledoniae

Posted 14 December 2011 - 11:20 AM

Big ALMO

http://stargazerslou...actor-pics.html

Schweet! :grin:

#16 laconicsax

laconicsax

    Vostok 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 105
  • Joined: 05 Oct 2010
  • Loc: Portland, OR

Posted 16 December 2011 - 02:31 AM

Pardon my ignorance, but how does a doublet apochromat work? I thought APOs were all triplets.

#17 Jeff Morgan

Jeff Morgan

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • *****
  • Posts: 5693
  • Joined: 28 Sep 2003
  • Loc: Prescott, AZ

Posted 16 December 2011 - 10:26 AM

The "standard" such as it is is determined by the manufacturers, and to some extent owner snobbery. As glass types and designs have improved, so has the definition. Progress marches on.

However, this does not mean that ED doublet made years ago performs any worse than it did as new. An old Porsche is still a Porsche.

There have been many doublets over the years considered APO by top opticians, and attached is the proof:

Attached Files



#18 StarStuff1

StarStuff1

    Soyuz

  • *****
  • Posts: 3875
  • Joined: 01 Apr 2007
  • Loc: South of the Mason-Dixon Line

Posted 16 December 2011 - 02:02 PM

I cancelled an order for a Star 120 when the ads came out for the new (then) Meade APO line. I don't recall the Star 120 being advertised as an APO.

#19 jrcrilly

jrcrilly

    Refractor wienie no more

  • *****
  • Administrators
  • Posts: 33795
  • Joined: 30 Apr 2003
  • Loc: NE Ohio

Posted 16 December 2011 - 02:31 PM

Pardon my ignorance, but how does a doublet apochromat work? I thought APOs were all triplets.


Some come pretty close, though the model in the article isn't one of them. At that aperture and F ratio the ED glass available in those days couldn't be combined with available flints to do it. Contemporary models using Flourite instead of crown glass, and later models using more modern ED crown glasses, come much closer. Some triplet models produced in that era didn't use ED glass at all, and they performed similarly to the early ED doublets even though they, too, were marketed as apo refractors.

#20 ylin

ylin

    Mariner 2

  • -----
  • Posts: 289
  • Joined: 23 May 2005
  • Loc: Irvine, CA

Posted 20 January 2012 - 02:33 PM

Very good review. Thanks. I missed my chance to get a brand new Meade 127 ED few years back, but did get a 102ED instead. I think 102ED is as good as 127ED and current new generation APO.

#21 Scott99

Scott99

    Mercury-Atlas

  • *****
  • Posts: 2891
  • Joined: 10 May 2007
  • Loc: New England

Posted 08 February 2012 - 12:04 PM

nice review! I can't believe it was that long ago that these were being sold, seems like just a few years ago to me.

just FYI, I believe the AP Star 12's were indeed coated on both lenses, the three that I've owned were all coated. I think some early ad copy mentioned uncoated but the lenses appear to be coated. The Vixen 102F I owned did have the fluorite element uncoated.

Good to see that APM in Germany is re-introducing a lightweight 6-inch ED doublet apo, apparently with lenses made by LZOS. hopefully it will become a regular product.

#22 astroneil

astroneil

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1806
  • Joined: 28 Jul 2009
  • Loc: res publica caledoniae

Posted 08 February 2012 - 04:39 PM

Yusen & Scott

Gratias vobis ago. ;)






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics