Something for nothing: Celestron C90
Posted 27 June 2014 - 03:53 PM
Posted 27 June 2014 - 08:32 PM
Likely rotated with a special tool that goes into the 2 hole.
I'll ask again. I'm being told that the corrector plate cell on the front of the C90's OTA can be unscrewed? How does one go about doing that?
There is a little dab of clear epoxy on mine to discourage anybody trying this.
I asked a guy who had flocked at least two 127 synta maksutov and he said the front part of the tube can be twisted off , messing with the tiny 2 holes can wreck the scope.
Posted 28 June 2014 - 09:34 AM
Picked up the Orion Apex 90, from the clearance page for 159.99
This thing is cute, can't wait for 1st light, pictures of the the new kitten to follow.
Posted 28 June 2014 - 04:18 PM
It did ok on Luna and planets;however, it lost to my 60/1000mm refractor every time on every target except DSOs, mainly globular clusters. I'm not knocking these as they can be very nice under the right skies on the right targets. I found the M45 not to fit in the ~1° tfov. They are lightweight and fun to use once the stray light issue gets worked out. Changing eye pieces can completely eliminate that issue.
Posted 28 June 2014 - 05:34 PM
Posted 28 June 2014 - 07:36 PM
Posted 28 June 2014 - 07:43 PM
Posted 28 June 2014 - 11:16 PM
Methinks this thread is more about the newer OTA made by Synta, and sold by Celestron as the C90 spotting scope since 2010
There have been posts about all vintages of the C90, it's been interesting to read the comparisons of the old vs. the new. Seems the consensus is that the optics were better figured in the older ones, but the throughput is better in the new. There are outlyers in the data on both ends of the curve, of course.
If I'm impressed with the old one when it arrives, I may start saving my quarters for the new version.
Posted 29 June 2014 - 01:26 PM
I've several of these over the years. All had ok optics, nothing fantastic. They are "cute" and make ok gng scopes as long as the temperatures are not extreme. I laughed out loud when getting the first one with a 32mm plossl, talk about vignetting big time! The plossl has a 27mm field stop while the rear baffle was constricted to around half that. I found that a Meade 26mm 4000 gave the widest fov with fair field illumination.
I measured the rear aperture in my C90 - one of the new batch - with a digital caliper. The opening is 16mm.
Posted 02 July 2014 - 03:42 PM
By the way, the corrector cell on my C90 refuses to budge. Do I need to put the scope in the freezer to shrink the metal?
A couple of these should do the trick:
For mine, I enlisted a friend's two hand to hold the tube, and used my own on the cell. Good luck!
Posted 05 July 2014 - 08:23 AM
Posted 05 July 2014 - 01:12 PM
Still haven't gotten the primary baffle-tube flocked quite yet, BUT! Last night I was at my parents' place (darker night sky there than @ my house). There was not a single cloud in the sky, and it was bone-dry. PERFECT telescope weather. I managed to find Mars and Saturn, and even split a double. I haven't got any way to take photos with the scope, sadly, but Saturn's rings were QUITE clearly visible. Hopefully I'll have a chance to order some Protostar flock-board soon.
Hey, I have had better than you might expect results just sticking a digicam up to the lens, aligning in the viewfinder and snapping a shot. Enough to give others an idea of what I am seeing anyway. Have managed some okay shots with cell phones that have a few control settings on the camera.
Posted 23 August 2014 - 04:27 PM
Can anyone recommend a 1.25" visual back for the C90 with compression rings? It would also be great to get measurements of the scope--the widest diameter (minus the finder) and the length (minus the diagonal).
Thanks. This thing sounds like fun.
Posted 23 August 2014 - 07:14 PM
The c90 is about 12cm at the widest 2 hoops excluding the dovetail and finder bracket protrusion.
Length is 27cm for the tube + 5.5cm for the visual back.