Jump to content


Photo

What do you think?

  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 Tank

Tank

    Vanguard

  • *****
  • Posts: 2366
  • Joined: 27 Jul 2009
  • Loc: Stoney Creek, Ontario, CANADA

Posted 10 August 2012 - 05:05 PM

Will this be a good setup or a bit unstable?
Meade 102 APO 14 lbs
SW 180 MAK 16 lbs
plus extras
on the LXD75
Just wondering i tested a bit in daytime but yet to test at night. I think it might be good!
What do you guys think?
Thanks for the feedback!

Attached Files



#2 Peter D.

Peter D.

    Mariner 2

  • *****
  • Posts: 216
  • Joined: 09 Feb 2012
  • Loc: Central New York

Posted 10 August 2012 - 05:26 PM

It looks a trifle topheavy, but Meade originally sold it with a 30 lb 10" f/4 Schmidt-Newtonian and it's probably not any worse than that. It will be a little wiggly, but it might be tolerable for visual use as long as it's balanced. Try this: while maintaining a good grasp, tip it on the tripod and if you can move it a foot sidewise without it wanting to fall over, it will probably OK as long as the wind isn't blowing too hard. I doubt that it would be steady enough for high power astro-photography.

Good Luck,

Pete

#3 gillmj24

gillmj24

    Aurora

  • *****
  • Posts: 4917
  • Joined: 06 Dec 2005
  • Loc: PA

Posted 10 August 2012 - 06:05 PM

Visual should be fine but maybe a bit shaky... don't expect an easy road if you want to do astrophotography though.

#4 Cliff Hipsher

Cliff Hipsher

    Apollo

  • ***--
  • Posts: 1147
  • Joined: 31 Dec 2008
  • Loc: North Chesterfield, VA

Posted 10 August 2012 - 06:15 PM

I think you need a 2nd mount.

#5 Nebhunter

Nebhunter

    Surveyor 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 1926
  • Joined: 04 Oct 2003
  • Loc: Frostbite Falls

Posted 10 August 2012 - 06:31 PM

For visual it might be OK - as long as there is no breeze. That's a lot of mass up there - and it looks like the CW's are maxed out on the shaft extension.

I might suggest doing a side by each setup. This would lower the centre of gravity and less CW required. Less wind resistance would also be a benefit. Just a thought.

#6 Tank

Tank

    Vanguard

  • *****
  • Posts: 2366
  • Joined: 27 Jul 2009
  • Loc: Stoney Creek, Ontario, CANADA

Posted 10 August 2012 - 06:46 PM

Peter
Its balanced there in the photo, thanks for the tips

gillmj24
not really going the astrophotograph way, just visual.

Cliff
If i got another mount it would be a Atlas or equivalet and i would get rid of the LXD75, the Tripod is a Super Meade Tripod with larger dia. legs than the original 1.5" legs.

Nebhumter
Yup its a extension on there and its maxed out
you might be right i might have to try out the side by side something like this

http://www.teleskop-...Montierung.html

#7 orlyandico

orlyandico

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • *****
  • Posts: 5637
  • Joined: 10 Aug 2009
  • Loc: Singapore

Posted 10 August 2012 - 06:47 PM

do note that the side-by-side (ADM sells one too - http://admaccessorie...Series_SBS.htm) weighs a good bit too (5lb or so? the Losmandy side-by-side is 7lb).






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics