Jump to content


Photo

Sketches with a 40"

  • Please log in to reply
29 replies to this topic

#26 starquake

starquake

    Ranger 4

  • -----
  • Posts: 392
  • Joined: 02 Feb 2008
  • Loc: Nádasdladány

Posted 21 September 2012 - 02:25 AM

My eye gets dark adapted really quick compared to a few folks I know. This also means that I lose my ability to see colours real quick.

There's a pretty interesting curve how dark adaptation works and how the rods (responsible for seeing shades but not colours) take over from the cones in the eye:

Posted Image

It was an interesting experience I had this summer, when we observed RS Cyg (a particularly red star) with my friend. We were pretty much dark adapted I think, but when she reported seeing the intense red shade of the star, all I saw was a shade of gray - this is perhaps because of what Alex said about ladies not having colour blindness at all or just rarely. I've then did an experiment and looked into white light for a few seconds to ruin my adaptation. And there came the wonder: the star was magical red for me too. Since then, I often ruin my dark adaptation if I want to see colours.

Ok, what I want to say with this is that maybe the skills of Frédéric come from an oddity that his eyes have a different distribution/sensitivity of cones and rods than what is considered as normal. Even I was struggling to see colours compared to my friend, so I do believe some folks are able to see colours even if they are fully dark adapted, not to mention that in a 40 incher you don't need dark adaptation at all to see details in the Ring nebula.

Perhaps Frédéric has "ladies eyes". ;)

I also recall a little friend of mine, who I met when he was only about 14 or so. He did observations on a very regular basis. He reported details and features in objects, that theoretically he shouldn't be able to see in his 6" telescope. Noone ever believed him, until on one Astro camp he gave proof that what others can barely see with averted vision is a bright object for him, full of fine details.

So I tend to believe that there are simply people with superior sight. But I also know from my own experience, that this can be learned to some extent.

#27 Ernest_SPB

Ernest_SPB

    Messenger

  • -----
  • Posts: 441
  • Joined: 13 Nov 2010
  • Loc: St.-Petersburg, Russia

Posted 21 September 2012 - 06:24 AM

I often ruin my dark adaptation if I want to see colours.

Even in full scale dark adaptation I can easily distinguish colour of my red light (used in work with star charts). So I do not think the method will work for me.

#28 starquake

starquake

    Ranger 4

  • -----
  • Posts: 392
  • Joined: 02 Feb 2008
  • Loc: Nádasdladány

Posted 24 September 2012 - 12:48 PM

I don't think the brightness of a red flashlight and a red star of any magnitude can be compared. Of course I see the red light of my observing light too, but stars are just too faint I guess.

#29 ericj

ericj

    Viking 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 663
  • Joined: 17 Feb 2005

Posted 24 September 2012 - 02:07 PM

Hi,

Very nice sketches, thanks for posting them. Using the 40" I don't think you will run out objects to sketch anytime soon :)

Clear Skies,

Eric Jamison

#30 Diabolo

Diabolo

    Sputnik

  • -----
  • Posts: 29
  • Joined: 28 Jun 2011

Posted 27 September 2012 - 11:33 AM

Ericj, yes, a whole life is not enough ;)

thanks Starquake for this very intresting piece of information ! Didn't know the average time necessary to have a good night vision adaptation, I keep it !






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics