Jump to content


Photo

What would you do? (Mount Options)

  • Please log in to reply
34 replies to this topic

#26 rmollise

rmollise

    Hubble

  • *****
  • Posts: 15458
  • Joined: 06 Jul 2007

Posted 12 October 2012 - 06:42 AM

Hi Rod, I'm contemplating a similar setup as Jim however, my choice will be primarily for imaging. You caught my attention stating that the AP mounts will have "less than stellar" go-to performance. Would you care to elaborate on this please? Eventually I may purchase a C14 for visual use.

Thank
Faron


Long focal length + mirror movement if not locked down = hard nut for the AP HC to crack.

#27 Raginar

Raginar

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • *****
  • Posts: 6138
  • Joined: 19 Oct 2010
  • Loc: Rapid CIty, SD

Posted 12 October 2012 - 08:25 AM

Rod, if you're going to use a long focal length scope with mirror flop, couldn't you use syncing/platesolving to correct for any error in the initial point model?

#28 jrbarnett

jrbarnett

    Eyepiece Hooligan

  • *****
  • Posts: 20036
  • Joined: 28 Feb 2006
  • Loc: Petaluma, CA

Posted 12 October 2012 - 11:32 AM

Hi Raginar.

That's just it. AP-900 or AP Mach 1 GTO?

I'm still a bit paralyzed by the pros and cons of each, but am leaning toward the Mach 1, (and also possibly later putting up a "want ad" for a used AP-900 QMD, though I'll probably wait until the AP-900 is obsoleted by a new AP mount (AP-1000?)).

Because I'm not a good "waiter", I'll probably order a tripod or pier from A-P to be able to use the mount upon arrival, but for travel I'm really considering one of those Rob Miller units.

Regards,

Jim

#29 rmollise

rmollise

    Hubble

  • *****
  • Posts: 15458
  • Joined: 06 Jul 2007

Posted 12 October 2012 - 02:54 PM

Rod, if you're going to use a long focal length scope with mirror flop, couldn't you use syncing/platesolving to correct for any error in the initial point model?



You can do any number of things with a cotton picking PC, but most visual oberservers--like the OP--probably don't want to. ;)

#30 crow

crow

    Ranger 4

  • *****
  • Posts: 394
  • Joined: 09 Jul 2012
  • Loc: BC, Canada

Posted 12 October 2012 - 03:18 PM

The Mach 1 from all the reports can do it all. The weight of the thing is a big plus, there's nothing really in that class IMO. combined with a light weight tripod you'd be able to pick the whole thing up and move it easily if necessary. I know I'd be very happy with it but for now Ill hold off. I see the 10 micron in my future perhaps, just to be different... :)

#31 jrbarnett

jrbarnett

    Eyepiece Hooligan

  • *****
  • Posts: 20036
  • Joined: 28 Feb 2006
  • Loc: Petaluma, CA

Posted 14 November 2012 - 08:50 PM

So...

I choked. I've sold off enough stuff generate funds sufficient for either a Mach 1 GTO or an A-P 900, but have shelved the idea of spending that kind of cash on a new mount. At least for now.

Though my Synta (Orion and Celestron liveried) mounts are battle-weary and threadbare in some cases, they work for what I use them for - visual observation with small and medium refractor and catadioptric OTAs. If it ain't broke...

Instead, I've put some of the dough raised in savings, left some in Paypal, and will instead finish downsizing on the mount, OTA and eyepiece front, and just enjoy what I keep for awhile. The intermediate term purchases I'm considering are a new, smaller "travel" Dob for multi-day dark sky trips (probably a Teeter again; I love Rob), and perhaps a swap of my old, very tired, abused, but steadfast Atlas for one of the new EQ6 AZs when they actually arrive and there are some user reports.

The only other plans that I have are (a) get a kayak (because I have a beautiful slough a mile from my house with easy put-ins, and 30+ miles of slough/river and shallow bay to explore) and (B) replace all of my cases for eyepieces and mount heads with Pelican cases.

I'm feeling like "I'm good" on the gear front, or will be when I finish shedding, and I'm really enjoying using the stuff for short mid-week sessions now that I have an unheated shed at my observing site.

I won't say "never" but I'm more likely to go for a used AP-900 QMD if one pops up than a new A-P mount. I like analog setting circles and paper observing lists with RA and Dec coordinates printed on them. It's not a race, after all.

Regards,

Jim

#32 delgado39

delgado39

    Vostok 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 117
  • Joined: 13 Nov 2007
  • Loc: Glen Ellen, California

Posted 16 November 2012 - 10:49 AM

Did you just pitch a "change up"? And just when I thought you were destined for a new mount. For a guy who loves the in's and out's with this hobby; I thought the AP was in the bag. You are challenging me to think (dare say re-evaluate) my spending habits. :bow:

#33 andysea

andysea

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1448
  • Joined: 03 Sep 2010
  • Loc: Seattle, WA

Posted 16 November 2012 - 09:39 PM

Seems like you made your decision. However if you still want a good mount I can vouch for the Mach1. It just works and it's very light.
I use the PASILL4L and it seems to be accurate enough for precise goto's and for guided AP. I have only had the mount out once with my TAK scope. The TOA with all the accoutrements weights in at about 34lbs. Here is my first light http://www.flickr.co...sea/8184013748/
It seems like the Mach1 didn't have any trouble carrying the TOA.
For transport I use a Pelican 1600.

Andy

#34 tomcody

tomcody

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1719
  • Joined: 06 Jul 2008
  • Loc: Titusville, Florida

Posted 22 November 2012 - 10:52 AM

I won't say "never" but I'm more likely to go for a used AP-900 QMD if one pops up than a new A-P mount. I like analog setting circles and paper observing lists with RA and Dec coordinates printed on them. It's not a race, after all.

Regards,

Jim

Jim, Have you checked with Astro-Physics to see if the 900 QMD is still serviceable? The reason I ask is that , as old technology, the parts (chips and such ) for the drive system may not be made any more or available and AP has said that the older QMD systems can not be upgraded to the newer drive systems, so if it breaks? I wonder if they can still fix it? :question:
Rex

#35 orlyandico

orlyandico

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • *****
  • Posts: 5355
  • Joined: 10 Aug 2009
  • Loc: Singapore

Posted 22 November 2012 - 12:46 PM

The 900QMD uses the AP 9000 quartz micro drive. Same one on my AP600QMD.

AP says they no longer have any stock but they have the older 8001 which works but doesn't micro-step hence the tracking is less smooth.

That said the 9000 QMD controller is fairly basic (I've cracked open mine to do some repairs). Wally from AP will repair it if it breaks, or basically most competent electronics guys can repair it.

The old 900QMD can have its declination axis upgraded so it becomes comparable to a 900GTO, but AP does this very rarely and only if enough QMDs come in for the service because it is a loss-leading service for them.

The 600QMD (and I imagine the 900QMD, since it uses the same controller) uses a very common Nippon Pulse stepper that is also used (with a different gear ratio - 120:1 instead of the 150:1 in the AP) in the Vixen MT-1 motor. So the thing is eminently serviceable.

In my case I put a German Littlefoot drive on my 600QMD, so I have GoTo. Had to replace the motors as well.

I was almost going to buy the AP900QMD that went for $3750 a month ago on the other site. That one was pristine, and drool-worthy. But... word is that the 900QMD without the declination upgrade is "similar" to the 600QMD in terms of DEC guiding performance - and I want to get away from that DEC guiding performance. :tonofbricks:

So.....






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics