Anyone have an XX16g on the way?
Posted 01 December 2012 - 01:04 PM
Posted 01 December 2012 - 11:51 PM
Posted 02 December 2012 - 01:25 AM
I agree, 200lbs is acceptable if you are talking about a 25-inch, but that is ridiculously heavy for a 16-inch. My 15-inch assembled weighs 120lbs, and that is because I have a heavy battery in the base. Just the telescope alone is about 100 lbs. That is much more reasonable for a 16-inch.
uhh, that thing is massive, 200lbs are you kidding me. And for that price Id much rather get a used premium dob of similar aperture.
OK... so there's two at least that do not have one on the way.... (maybe start another thread along the lines of "orion 16G too heavy for me or anyone", or "why i'm not ordering the orion 16G...")
Hopefully we can continue to hear from those that do have one on the way and if arrived how they like it? How they feel about the weight, if they feel it such a gross negative to justify going to another vendor or buying something else on used market?, or if the 'convex-back' mirror/cell construction, collimation, and cooling is better or worse or non-issue, or if the weight / drive system any difference in performance in a windy night of viewing...
I'd much prefer to hear more about what these scopes are from folks that have them... instead of what they are not by folks who have never used them.
Posted 04 December 2012 - 11:08 PM
OK, now the weight issue. It is heavy, there’s no disputing that. But it does break down into manageable pieces. And the weight has a benefit: in a gusty wind last Saturday there was little shake in the image. The only wind effect I noticed was that I had to tighten the clutch as it tried to turn into the wind.
The conical mirror is great. Without fans it is fully equalized by the time I get everything assembled. It holds collimation very well for a truss tube. I keep the trusses in the same position each time and I really haven’t had to collimate it. I just started to notice it was a little off by the end of the night Saturday.
The closed-loop electronics work as advertised. I loosened the clutch and pushed it all over the place and it was still accurate when I used the go-to.
Posted 07 December 2012 - 11:57 AM
Posted 07 December 2012 - 10:05 PM
Posted 15 December 2012 - 01:21 AM
I still really like the idea of the scope, but my purchase of one has been greatly put off as I recently picked up a used C11 for a good price. Couldn't quite swing the $4k for the XX16g yet. Maybe in a few more years now!