Primarily based on LRO. Very nice, highly detailed images and explanations of Lunar geography.
Is it primarily based on LRO photos? Or something older?
The dark side was shown in four quadrant maps.
How is the scale, compared to something like the Rukl atlas?
Is there token coverage of the farside?
The scale is good, but my frame of reference is Legault's New Atlas of the Moon.
Are the charts rectified (no foreshortening)?
Is there a lot of discussion on the origins of various features, or is it primarily an observer's atlas? Chuck Wood has a way of mingling all of it together - did he go one way or the other on this?
Yes, Chuck had a lot to say about the origins of Lunar geography. I would have responded sooner, but I was enjoying reading the descriptions of the different types of craters, rilles and mountains. Very interesting stuff!!!!