Jump to content


Photo

M77 and NGC 1055 - Galactic Neighbors

  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

#1 srosenfraz

srosenfraz

    Skylab

  • *****
  • Posts: 4201
  • Joined: 06 Mar 2011
  • Loc: United States

Posted 04 December 2012 - 11:55 PM

M77 and NGC 1055 form an interesting pair of galaxies in Cetus and are the dominant galaxies in the M77 group of galaxies:


Posted Image

High Resolution version and more image details available at http://www.astronome...php?c=113&p=471.

This image is a composite image made from a wider frame with both galaxies, and then separate cropped images of M77 and NGC 1055. 435 x 3 minute subs (total exposure time 21 3/4 hours) at ISO 1600 were captured via a Celestron C-8 (orange tube), Celestron focal reducer at f/5.8 (1160mm), and Gary Honis modified Canon 450D. Guiding was with an ONAG On-axis Guider, Lodestar autoguider, and Phd Guiding.

Thanks for looking!

#2 waassaabee

waassaabee

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • *****
  • Posts: 5150
  • Joined: 26 Nov 2007
  • Loc: Central California Coast

Posted 05 December 2012 - 12:01 AM

Excellent work Scott!! Everything about it is awesome.

#3 Skyshooter

Skyshooter

    Viking 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 533
  • Joined: 06 Apr 2008
  • Loc: S. Utah, U.S.A.

Posted 05 December 2012 - 12:15 AM

Beautiful unique pairing. Great work!

CLS
Ed

#4 Jerry Lodriguss

Jerry Lodriguss

    Vendor

  • *****
  • Vendors
  • Posts: 3702
  • Joined: 19 Jul 2008
  • Loc: Voorhees, NJ

Posted 05 December 2012 - 12:25 AM

Hi Scott,

That is outstanding!

Jerry

#5 Craig H

Craig H

    Vostok 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 152
  • Joined: 08 Apr 2009
  • Loc: Portland, OR

Posted 05 December 2012 - 12:47 AM

Nice pair! Added bonus is the great colour contrast of the two brightest stars. +1 for the patience required for all that data.

This shot might convince me to go back to 1600 ISO (sigh -- I've wrestled with myself so many times on this question)

Cheers!

#6 mmalik

mmalik

    DSLR camera modifications

  • *****
  • Vendors
  • Posts: 5478
  • Joined: 13 Jan 2012
  • Loc: USA

Posted 05 December 2012 - 02:54 AM

Good neighbors; crop may be in order as a follow-up. Thx

#7 nikao

nikao

    Explorer 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 65
  • Joined: 14 Jun 2012

Posted 05 December 2012 - 05:04 AM

Wow!! Nice result and very impressive dedication :) 435 exposures.... wow!

#8 fco_star

fco_star

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1783
  • Joined: 13 Dec 2010
  • Loc: Texas, Midland

Posted 05 December 2012 - 07:18 AM

Beautiful picture Scott

#9 jambroseus

jambroseus

    Viking 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 663
  • Joined: 05 Apr 2007
  • Loc: Mount Laurel, New Jersey

Posted 05 December 2012 - 08:05 AM

Hi Scott,

Great shot! Your Celestron FR gave you f/5.8, is that the standard f/6.3 FR modified with a different spacer? What is the spacing?

John

#10 Eyegasms

Eyegasms

    Mariner 2

  • -----
  • Posts: 241
  • Joined: 08 Aug 2011
  • Loc: ON Canada

Posted 05 December 2012 - 08:27 AM

Nicely done.

#11 Orion58

Orion58

    Viking 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 919
  • Joined: 28 Oct 2011
  • Loc: Southern Wisconsin

Posted 05 December 2012 - 10:54 AM

Very cool Scott - an interesting/refreshing perspective.

#12 nikao

nikao

    Explorer 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 65
  • Joined: 14 Jun 2012

Posted 05 December 2012 - 01:32 PM

I'm wondering; how tough/faint is this object? I don't see this one often, yet it is a really great subject!

#13 Mike B.

Mike B.

    Vanguard

  • *****
  • Posts: 2263
  • Joined: 24 Oct 2005
  • Loc: Louisiana

Posted 05 December 2012 - 08:20 PM

Really nice image you have there, Scott. Excellent, in fact. Keep on doing what you're doing. Its working! lol

#14 srosenfraz

srosenfraz

    Skylab

  • *****
  • Posts: 4201
  • Joined: 06 Mar 2011
  • Loc: United States

Posted 05 December 2012 - 10:04 PM

Thank you everyone for your very positive comments - I really appreciate it!

#15 David Pavlich

David Pavlich

    Transmographied

  • *****
  • Administrators
  • Posts: 27930
  • Joined: 18 May 2005
  • Loc: Mandeville, LA USA

Posted 05 December 2012 - 10:31 PM

That's nice work, Scott!!

David

#16 srosenfraz

srosenfraz

    Skylab

  • *****
  • Posts: 4201
  • Joined: 06 Mar 2011
  • Loc: United States

Posted 05 December 2012 - 10:39 PM

Thank you everyone for your very nice comments - I really appreciate it.

@Craig - FYI, the only reason I use ISO 1600 is because I prefer to use relatively short 3 minute subs (for a variety of reasons). Because I'm imaging from fairly dark skies (typically SQM readings around 21.4), I need to use ISO 1600 to bring my background out of the read noise of the camera (i.e., histogram mountain separated from left axis on the back of the camera). Optimally, I'd prefer to shoot at ISO 400 (close to unity gain for my camera), but I'd have to shoot too long a sub to obtain reasonable separation of sky fog and read noise. So, I use the higher ISO. Frankly, I'm not a big believer that different ISOs have a significant effect on image outcome (presuming you don't clip too many bright stars on the highlight end and have adequate separation from the sky background and read noise on the shadow end).

@Mike - Thanks for the suggestion - I had posted over the last month or so the separate portions of the composites for each of the galaxies. Here are links (on my website - not the CN postings) to each of them:

M77 - http://www.astronome...php?c=113&p=467

NGC 1055 - http://www.astronome...php?c=113&p=468

@John - my ONAG on-axis guider forces the FR to focal plane distance to about 120mm. This ends up yielding f/5.8 at 1160mm. The image is somewhat more vignetted with the wider field, and the stars are pretty crummy at the edges (unless you focus for the edges). You can see a little bit of these poor stars in three of the four edges of this image (the upper left is clean because I cropped that corner to frame the galaxies). The wider field isn't terribly usable without doing focus stacking (taking subs focused for different parts of the FOV), but the imaging train is slightly faster (roughly 20%). I think you're better off keeping the nominal spacing of 105mm unless you're forced to the larger spacing (because of something like your guider).

@nikao - the core of M77 is quite bright, so you could probably image it from fairly bright skies. Its a great target because it has some wonderful detail. The outer halo for M77 is really faint and subtle, so I'd plan on dark skies to try to capture that (or an awful lot of time from a brighter sky). NGC 1055 is relatively faint and is a pretty tough target. If you have a focal length of about 1200mm or shorter, you may as well frame in NGC 1055 if you're shooting M77 - they'll fit in the same FOV.

Thanks again everyone!

#17 nikao

nikao

    Explorer 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 65
  • Joined: 14 Jun 2012

Posted 06 December 2012 - 03:17 AM

wow, you're so lucky to have such dark skies to image from :)

I will keep this on my target list for when I'm able to get to real dark skies as well :)

#18 Yoddha

Yoddha

    Vendor (APT)

  • *****
  • Vendors
  • Posts: 1418
  • Joined: 25 Sep 2008
  • Loc: Sofia-Bulgaria

Posted 06 December 2012 - 08:07 AM

As usual amazing image from you, Scott!

#19 chapleau

chapleau

    Explorer 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 60
  • Joined: 01 Nov 2005
  • Loc: Gorman, California

Posted 06 December 2012 - 03:10 PM

Amazing! I pm'd you, since we're sortaneighbors, but your work is an inspiration to me. I've got some time in the dome ahead, that's for sure! A new D5100 and I are going to be good friends!

#20 MarPiw

MarPiw

    Vostok 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 116
  • Joined: 30 Sep 2011
  • Loc: South of Poland

Posted 07 December 2012 - 05:05 AM

Supreb! Congratulation - great picture

#21 bilgebay

bilgebay

    Skylab

  • *****
  • Moderators
  • Posts: 4283
  • Joined: 06 Nov 2008
  • Loc: Turkiye - Istanbul and Marmaris

Posted 07 December 2012 - 06:26 AM

Great shot Scott... and beautiful skies.

#22 srosenfraz

srosenfraz

    Skylab

  • *****
  • Posts: 4201
  • Joined: 06 Mar 2011
  • Loc: United States

Posted 07 December 2012 - 09:08 PM

Thank you very much for your nice feed back Nikao, Ivo, Richard and Sedat.

#23 Nils_Lars

Nils_Lars

    Voyager 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 10055
  • Joined: 04 Jan 2008
  • Loc: Santa Cruz Mountains , CA

Posted 07 December 2012 - 11:04 PM

A very cool pairing , perfectly processed as usual Scott

#24 petemumbower

petemumbower

    Surveyor 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 1700
  • Joined: 12 Jul 2009
  • Loc: West Michigan

Posted 08 December 2012 - 10:59 PM

Outstanding job capturing and processing this neat pair Scott!






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics