Jump to content


Photo

New Refractor OTA's! WOW!!

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
7 replies to this topic

#1 mikey cee

mikey cee

    Cosmos

  • *****
  • Posts: 8118
  • Joined: 18 Jan 2007
  • Loc: bellevue ne.

Posted 10 January 2013 - 06:13 PM

Take a look at this puppy. http://www.istar-optical.com/ Now that's what I call ingenuity. Not for me tho' I'm just too old school. But to many newbies and nonconformists this should be a grand slam! ;) Mike
 

#2 John Jarosz

John Jarosz

    Astro Gearhead

  • *****
  • Posts: 3217
  • Joined: 25 Apr 2004
  • Loc: Fairfax, Iowa

Posted 10 January 2013 - 06:44 PM

Well, the only think I can think the refractor purists will complain about is the open tube will permit air current to distort the image (Horrors!).

But the design does show some original thinking. I'm all for it.

John
 

#3 mikey cee

mikey cee

    Cosmos

  • *****
  • Posts: 8118
  • Joined: 18 Jan 2007
  • Loc: bellevue ne.

Posted 10 January 2013 - 06:54 PM

I wondered about that too John. But Istar eays it plans to market a "sleeve" similar to what dobs use. Some may not see the need tho'. Would depend largely on their immediate surrounds I would guess. They also saw the findings by use of a "rail" scope in testing lenses. If rail scopes don't suffer much from thermals I guess they know what they are doing. I'm no expert. :grin: Mike
 

#4 pstarr

pstarr

    Gemini

  • *****
  • Posts: 3022
  • Joined: 17 Sep 2004
  • Loc: NE Ohio

Posted 10 January 2013 - 06:54 PM

One of the strong points of the refactor is the fact that it has a closed tube. It keeps the optics clean, tube currents down and stray light out. I wouldn't want the design shown in the example. I really can't see any advantage to that design.
 

#5 Ed D

Ed D

    Gemini

  • *****
  • Posts: 3076
  • Joined: 30 Apr 2010
  • Loc: Sunny South Florida

Posted 10 January 2013 - 07:46 PM

Can't really say much.

Ed D
 

#6 MKV

MKV

    Mercury-Atlas

  • *****
  • Posts: 2608
  • Joined: 20 Jan 2011

Posted 10 January 2013 - 07:49 PM

Great, but don't you think this should be on the refractors forum rather than the DIY forum?

Regards,
Mladen
 

#7 Dave O

Dave O

    Ranger 4

  • *****
  • Posts: 380
  • Joined: 21 Dec 2011
  • Loc: Sri Lanka

Posted 10 January 2013 - 09:58 PM

Seems like a pretty big step backwards ... a sealed tube has generally been considered an advantage of refractors ....
 

#8 David Pavlich

David Pavlich

    Transmographied

  • *****
  • Administrators
  • Posts: 27767
  • Joined: 18 May 2005
  • Loc: Mandeville, LA USA

Posted 10 January 2013 - 10:25 PM

Link to Refractors. There's another thread just like this one in Refractors that's getting a lot more responses. I'm going to lock this one.

David
 






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics