Jump to content


Photo

Samsung SCB-2000 specs for CCD Calc?

  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 Dennis_S253

Dennis_S253

    Surveyor 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 1729
  • Joined: 22 Nov 2011
  • Loc: West Central Florida

Posted 23 January 2013 - 05:34 PM

I was trying to plug some numbers for the SCB-2000 into Ron Wodaski's CCD calculater program. I'm not sure if I'm doing this right though. For Pixel Size I put 12.4 x 17, and Array Size I put 678 x 494. When I did this it came up the chip size was 8.4mm x 8.4mm. Which I guess would be 1/3" chip like the SCB-2000 has. Am I doing this right?

#2 mclewis1

mclewis1

    Thread Killer

  • ****-
  • Posts: 10991
  • Joined: 25 Feb 2006
  • Loc: New Brunswick, Canada

Posted 23 January 2013 - 06:30 PM

Dennis,

I believe the correct numbers for the 1/3" sensor used in the SDC-435/SCB2000 cameras should be ...

6.35 x 7.4
768 x 494

The 1/3" chip is about 6mm diagonally.

#3 Dennis_S253

Dennis_S253

    Surveyor 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 1729
  • Joined: 22 Nov 2011
  • Loc: West Central Florida

Posted 23 January 2013 - 09:55 PM

Thanks Mark, I found another calc program also, so I'll try both and see what happens. It just seems wierd, I plug the numbers in and even with a .5 reducer I wouldn't even be able to get a full moon. My scope is a 6", 1000mm FL F/7. Does that sound right?

#4 mclewis1

mclewis1

    Thread Killer

  • ****-
  • Posts: 10991
  • Joined: 25 Feb 2006
  • Loc: New Brunswick, Canada

Posted 23 January 2013 - 10:35 PM

Dennis,

Actually it does sound right.

With my AT80ED (which is a 560mm fl scope) I can just fit a full solar/lunar disk on the slightly larger sensor in a Mallincam (which is a 1/2" or 8mm diagonal sensor). So a 1000mm scope with a .5x reducer (500mm effective) and a 1/3" sensor probably won't fit the entire solar/lunar disk ... but it should be quite close.

A couple of things to watch when trying to figure out actual fov's ...

1) the sensors have a total number of pixels and an effective number ... for example the Sony sensors are built with 811 x 508 pixel arrays (which is what some documentation states) but are actually (or effectively) 768 x 494 arrays.
2) USB frame grabbers impose another restriction to or change the actual fov displayed on a PC. They capture and display at other resolutions compared to the effective layout of the sensor. 720 x 480 or 640 x 480 are popular resolutions. Some frame grabbers/capture software are interpolating between the two (the actual or effective resolution of the sensor and the capture or display resolution) which seems to change the actual fov a bit as well.

#5 Dennis_S253

Dennis_S253

    Surveyor 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 1729
  • Joined: 22 Nov 2011
  • Loc: West Central Florida

Posted 24 January 2013 - 12:58 AM

Wow, cool...thx for the info. So, it seems I need to look for a scope that has a lower FL. Or a better camera than the SCB-2000. It's getting to late, I need some rest. Thx.

#6 nytecam

nytecam

    Voyager 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 11507
  • Joined: 20 Aug 2005
  • Loc: London UK

Posted 24 January 2013 - 06:14 AM

Wow, cool...thx for the info. So, it seems I need to look for a scope that has a lower FL. Or a better camera than the SCB-2000. It's getting to late, I need some rest. Thx.

As a simple rule-of-thumb the diameter of the moon [and sun] on the imaging chip is ~1% of the effective focal length of the telescope. So to get the whole moon ~5mm diameter onto an SCB-2000 chip [noted above]with some clearance around then the scope EFL = ~500mm. Of course part of the moon will appear much more detailed with a longer focal length say 1000mm - 2000mm maybe via a Barlow lens. Good luck :grin:

#7 mattflastro

mattflastro

    Vendor - Astrovideo Systems

  • -----
  • Posts: 622
  • Joined: 31 Jul 2009
  • Loc: Brevard County , FL

Posted 24 January 2013 - 10:29 AM

Wow, cool...thx for the info. So, it seems I need to look for a scope that has a lower FL. Or a better camera than the SCB-2000. It's getting to late, I need some rest. Thx.


Your options list is missing the easiest one , get a different focal reducer.
A .33 FR instead of your .5 would do the trick without having to buy a new scope or a "better camera" .
The part with the better camera is especially tricky because while you may buy better or more expensive cams, they may or may not have a larger CCD size, so you could find yourself in the same situation with the new cam if the CCD is a similar size .

#8 barbarosa

barbarosa

    Viking 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 870
  • Joined: 11 Apr 2010
  • Loc: 37°50'N

Posted 24 January 2013 - 12:37 PM

... a scope that has a lower FL. Or a better camera than the SCB-2000.


Another optionm, is to use a f/6.3 on the scope and a .5x on the cam. I had an f/6.3 reducer for visual use, and wanted a wider FOV for last the transit and eclipse last year. Adding a .5x reducer on the c-mount adapter gave me almost .5 degree. Inserting a filter between the c-mount adapter and the .5x reducer increased the FOV just enough to capture the moon or sun with my C5 and SCB-2000.






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics