Jump to content


Photo

Denkmeier Hi-Def UHC Filter?

  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 Heitman

Heitman

    Mariner 2

  • *****
  • Posts: 241
  • Joined: 26 Jan 2007
  • Loc: Reeds, NC

Posted 30 January 2013 - 10:23 PM

Hi,
I've been doing a lot of searching and reading on the various UHC Narrow-band filters, and was curious if anyone has firsthand experience with the Denkmeier Hi-Def UHC Narrow-band filter. Thanks, Tim

#2 David Knisely

David Knisely

    Hubble

  • *****
  • Posts: 15635
  • Joined: 19 Apr 2004
  • Loc: southeastern Nebraska

Posted 31 January 2013 - 02:08 AM

OK, the specs sheet shows a filter bandwidth (Full Width at Half Maximum) of about 397 angstroms which is a little too broad to make a good narrow-band nebula filter. It also shows a peak transmission of 100% which might be stretching believability a little, as most quality production interference filters with this kind of bandwidth rarely have peak transmissions much higher than 97%. It is a "compromise" filter with a bandwidth between that of a broad-band LPR filter and a narrow-band nebula filter. In short, it is a "jack of all trades, master of none" when it comes to a filter for deep-sky objects. It will dim continuum objects like star clusters and galaxies more than the broad-band LPR filters do. It would work on emission nebulae to some degree, but won't quite provide as much of a contrast boost as a true narrow-band nebula filter like the DGM Optics NPB, Orion Ultrablock, or the Lumicon UHC filter (the "true" UHC filter). If you want a good nebula filter, I would recommend the DGM NPB, Orion Ultrablock, or Lumicon UHC as better alternatives. Clear skies to you.

#3 Heitman

Heitman

    Mariner 2

  • *****
  • Posts: 241
  • Joined: 26 Jan 2007
  • Loc: Reeds, NC

Posted 31 January 2013 - 07:51 AM

Thanks David. I looked at the spec sheet also, and it seemed a little wide to me. Just curious what others think about it.
Tim






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics