Jump to content


Photo

Really nice midsized refractor

  • Please log in to reply
17 replies to this topic

#1 jerry10137

jerry10137

    Messenger

  • *****
  • Posts: 406
  • Joined: 26 Jan 2013
  • Loc: Texas, USA

Posted 03 February 2013 - 08:18 PM

Hey everyone, I'm looking to purchase a nice midsized refractor and wanted your thoughts on this....

http://www.astronomi...ctor-optical...

Looking for something between 80mm and 100mm that will be great for both photography and viewing. Would this be a good clear choice? Budget is 2,500 and due to mount restrictions, it really should weigh less than 10 lbs.

#2 Scott in NC

Scott in NC

    80mm Refractor Fanatic

  • *****
  • Administrators
  • Posts: 15701
  • Joined: 05 Mar 2005
  • Loc: NC

Posted 03 February 2013 - 08:29 PM

How about the Stellarvue SV90T f/7 apo triplet?

#3 jerry10137

jerry10137

    Messenger

  • *****
  • Posts: 406
  • Joined: 26 Jan 2013
  • Loc: Texas, USA

Posted 03 February 2013 - 08:47 PM

That is def another option that seems to fit the bill. Thanks for the recommendation.

The TMB and SV seem to both be priced about the same.

#4 Scott Beith

Scott Beith

    SRF

  • *****
  • Administrators
  • Posts: 44496
  • Joined: 26 Nov 2003
  • Loc: Frederick, MD

Posted 03 February 2013 - 10:39 PM

Both will be excellent for your uses. The TMB is faster at f/5.5.

#5 Scott in NC

Scott in NC

    80mm Refractor Fanatic

  • *****
  • Administrators
  • Posts: 15701
  • Joined: 05 Mar 2005
  • Loc: NC

Posted 03 February 2013 - 11:31 PM

I mentioned the SV90T because that's the only 90mm scope that I have personal experience with, but now that I've had a chance to read the specs on the TMB92, I think that looks like a really nice scope. I don't think you'd go wrong with either one.

#6 jerry10137

jerry10137

    Messenger

  • *****
  • Posts: 406
  • Joined: 26 Jan 2013
  • Loc: Texas, USA

Posted 06 February 2013 - 09:50 PM

How about a Williams Optics? How are those stacking up against these?

#7 Scott Beith

Scott Beith

    SRF

  • *****
  • Administrators
  • Posts: 44496
  • Joined: 26 Nov 2003
  • Loc: Frederick, MD

Posted 06 February 2013 - 10:13 PM

Which model from WO?

#8 jerry10137

jerry10137

    Messenger

  • *****
  • Posts: 406
  • Joined: 26 Jan 2013
  • Loc: Texas, USA

Posted 06 February 2013 - 11:07 PM

I've been eyeballing the GTF81 5 element. It comes with a field flattener built in. I believe their 98mm models are too large for what I'm going to use them for.

#9 Mike Clemens

Mike Clemens

    Frozen to Eyepiece

  • *****
  • Posts: 7577
  • Joined: 26 Nov 2005
  • Loc: Alaska, USA

Posted 07 February 2013 - 12:52 AM

If used is an option... I've found two TMB100/8 over the years for under $2 grand. That's as good as it gets in 4".

#10 Jon Isaacs

Jon Isaacs

    ISS

  • *****
  • Posts: 43918
  • Joined: 16 Jun 2004
  • Loc: San Diego and Boulevard, CA

Posted 07 February 2013 - 10:53 AM

I've been eyeballing the GTF81 5 element. It comes with a field flattener built in. I believe their 98mm models are too large for what I'm going to use them for.


What are the mount restrictions you refer to? What mount are you planning on using? For photography, combination focal reducer/field flatteners are available so the built in field flattener is not such a big deal.

Jon

#11 jerry10137

jerry10137

    Messenger

  • *****
  • Posts: 406
  • Joined: 26 Jan 2013
  • Loc: Texas, USA

Posted 07 February 2013 - 08:25 PM

I've been eyeballing the GTF81 5 element. It comes with a field flattener built in. I believe their 98mm models are too large for what I'm going to use them for.


What are the mount restrictions you refer to? What mount are you planning on using? For photography, combination focal reducer/field flatteners are available so the built in field flattener is not such a big deal.

Jon


I'm trying to stay somewhat conservative if I can. I'd like to start taking some nice photos. I purchased a used C9.25 and CI700 mount for a pretty good deal. The mount is rated at 60lbs and is in great condition. It has been well kept. What I wanted to do was view or guide thru the 9.25 and piggyback a refractor on top of it for some photos. THE OTA is 20lbs. A refractor under 10lbs will put me at the 30lb half way point that I keep reading about. Obviously, a camera and an eyepiece will add a little more weight. What I really wanted to do was throw a C11HD on it and piggyback an AT65EDQ or a lighter 80mm but have decided against that for right now. And you are right, the field flattener is not a huge deal but I will need one either way.

Right now I am considering a WO81GTF, TMB92L/SS or a SV90T Triplet. Right now the SV is winning the race for me.

#12 jerry10137

jerry10137

    Messenger

  • *****
  • Posts: 406
  • Joined: 26 Jan 2013
  • Loc: Texas, USA

Posted 07 February 2013 - 08:31 PM

If used is an option... I've found two TMB100/8 over the years for under $2 grand. That's as good as it gets in 4".


Used is def an option for me. The astronomical community takes very good care of their things for the most part. However, I have not seen a used TMB100 lately.

#13 JJK

JJK

    Surveyor 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 1990
  • Joined: 27 Apr 2008

Posted 08 February 2013 - 06:30 AM

Hey everyone, I'm looking to purchase a nice midsized refractor and wanted your thoughts on this....

http://www.astronomi...ctor-optical...

Looking for something between 80mm and 100mm that will be great for both photography and viewing. Would this be a good clear choice? Budget is 2,500 and due to mount restrictions, it really should weigh less than 10 lbs.



A 92 mm refractor is not mid-sized; ~ 150 mm is.

#14 Jon Isaacs

Jon Isaacs

    ISS

  • *****
  • Posts: 43918
  • Joined: 16 Jun 2004
  • Loc: San Diego and Boulevard, CA

Posted 08 February 2013 - 07:08 AM

Hey everyone, I'm looking to purchase a nice midsized refractor and wanted your thoughts on this....

http://www.astronomi...ctor-optical...

Looking for something between 80mm and 100mm that will be great for both photography and viewing. Would this be a good clear choice? Budget is 2,500 and due to mount restrictions, it really should weigh less than 10 lbs.



A 92 mm refractor is not mid-sized; ~ 150 mm is.


In the big picture, a 150mm scope is a small scope, maybe borderline medium, 300mm is mid-sized, 500mm large...

But refractors are a special case, I consider a midsized refractor to be around 4 inches. In any event, the original poster has already defined "mid sized" for the purposes of this thread, something under 10 lbs.

Jon

#15 turtledude1

turtledude1

    Explorer 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 77
  • Joined: 08 Oct 2008
  • Loc: SW Fla.& SW. NM

Posted 08 February 2013 - 02:50 PM

Both the TMB 92SS an the 92L are great scopes, what sold me on the 92SS was all the great reviews and the 3" Feather Touch focuser. I also have 5 Stellarvues so I won't say anything bad about those, just check to see if they are using florite glass. I just ordered one the first William Optics GTF 102 it will be here Monday. Well i guess I approve WO also but if I were picking a new 92 I would go with the TMB as first choice.

Russ

#16 Paco_Grande

Paco_Grande

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1594
  • Joined: 14 Jul 2012
  • Loc: Banana Republic of California

Posted 08 February 2013 - 03:38 PM

How about the new William Optics GTF102 102mm f/6.9 Apo? I almost pulled the trigger on one and then stumbled on a used WO William Optics FLT 98 Triplet and bought it instead. I like the fact that the GTF has a built-in flattener, which is not true of the FLT.

The GTF is listed at 11 lbs tube weight.

http://agenaastro.co...pe-with-flat...

#17 jerry10137

jerry10137

    Messenger

  • *****
  • Posts: 406
  • Joined: 26 Jan 2013
  • Loc: Texas, USA

Posted 12 February 2013 - 12:05 AM

Well I ordered the SV90RT from OPT this afternoon. It will serve multiple functions and I can't wait to get it.

#18 JMW

JMW

    Apollo

  • -----
  • Posts: 1411
  • Joined: 11 Feb 2007
  • Loc: Nevada

Posted 12 February 2013 - 03:12 PM

You will enjoy your scope. It is a very usable size but will work well for wider views and darker skies.

JJK:

If 150mm is a mid sized refractor, than you will have to budget a lot of money for a large APO refractor. Here is my grouping of refractor sizes:

<100mm small
100-150 medium
150+ unaffordable






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics