Orion Atlas Pro AZ/EQ-G Computerized GoTo Mount
Posted 10 February 2013 - 01:43 PM
I'm eagerly waiting to get my hands on mine
Posted 10 February 2013 - 01:49 PM
OP: There are several threads about it...try a good search.
Posted 10 April 2013 - 10:07 AM
Once my ATRC8 show up I will see how well it works.
The power read out is incorrect and shows 20 volts.
The polor scope 'cones' and is not exactly centered. You can center the cross hairs and it is not out of center very much.
More to come!
Posted 10 April 2013 - 12:12 PM
The new one shows the voltage as it should.
Anyhow it's only a matter of the internal voltmeter most probably.
Posted 09 May 2013 - 07:02 PM
Posted 11 November 2013 - 04:26 PM
very nice mount
Posted 14 November 2013 - 07:45 AM
Comparing the Skywatcher handcontroller to the Celestron I realized that it is much more difficult to find alignment stars (much fewer in the Skywatcher) than with my SE mount. Under polluted sky and with restricted views it is not always that easy to find alignment stars - and one needs to know their names (other than with Celestron) ... Moreover, right after I bought the mount I upgraded to the latest (3.35) software version which turns out to have been a bad decision with regard to pointing. Maybe I will downgrade again in the near future.
Another drawback is that the handcontroller appears not allow for alignment to the sun (for solar work).
I do know that there is a lot of extra software (e.g., EQMOD) and work-arounds, but I think products should work well just out of the box.
I had the bad voltage reading as well but there is a fix for that on the Skywatcher webpage (use fix only if you have that problem).
This sounds like I am not happy with the mount, but that's not true. I am certainly pampered by the easier handling of the Celestron handcontroller which is just much more convenient. However, I really like the stability when doing planetary imaging using a small field of view cam, or when I am collimating the NexStar 8SE (also with a webcam for observation of the infocus and out-of-focus images) and just nothing wobbles.
So for me (a casual observer, but used to precision instruments in my professional work) this is a very nice, solid and well built mount, but it certainly has some potential to improve with regard to handling.
Hope this helps
Posted 19 January 2014 - 12:26 AM
Posted 20 January 2014 - 12:22 AM
Posted 20 January 2014 - 12:35 AM
Posted 20 January 2014 - 05:34 AM
I have heard the solar alignment may have to be enabled but I can't confirm that for certain. A lot of handset lock it for safety reasons.
I have the Skywatcher version of this mount and there is no option to enable the Sun. In fact the Sun is not even an object that you can slew to which is a shame. You would have to choose an object such as Mercury to get somewhat close and then adjust from there. Another option is to have the auxiliary encoders enabled, set the scope at zero-Az/zero-Alt and set that as the "Home" position, then if you know what the Alt&Az position of the Sun is, you can slew or manually move the scope to match those numbers on the hand controller.
Posted 22 January 2014 - 02:37 PM
Posted 26 March 2014 - 06:49 PM
I've been using mine for imaging with a 130mm refractor and a 80 mm guide scope for a year and I can only say it works as well as my G11 with this load.. Total load 40 lbs.