Jump to content


CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.


C14HD full illuminated field

  • Please log in to reply
27 replies to this topic

#26 Lee Jay

Lee Jay


  • *****
  • Posts: 1207
  • Joined: 27 Feb 2008
  • Loc: Westminster, CO

Posted 25 February 2013 - 10:32 AM

Unlikely. The vignetting is a function of the baffles and the apertuer of the reducer.

Nothing you do downstream of them will change this in any meaningful way.

That's most certainly untrue. You can restrict it, to any arbitrary degree you like.

The inside diameter of a T-adapter is in the 1.5" or 38mm range. My sensor is 43.3mm corner to corner. It's entirely possible that a 38mm restriction can add additional shading that wouldn't be present with the roughly 45mm ID restriction of the 2" barrel.

#27 Eddgie



  • *****
  • Posts: 17222
  • Joined: 01 Feb 2006

Posted 25 February 2013 - 10:38 AM

1” scopes, because they are all the same…

Far from correct. While a 1" f/6.3 scope would give the same brightness as an 8" f/6.3 scope, there would be a huge difference in how they would image.

The true field would be far larger in the 1" scope, but everything in the view would be far smaller.

The role of a telescope is to magnify the image. This is true both visually and photographicly.

While the brightness at the focal plane for these two scopes (1" and 8", both f/6.3) for extented objects is identical, the larger aperture in this case would give 8 times the image scale. Objects that were simply smudges in the 1" scope would be large enough to see structure and detail in the 8" scope.

If they were all the same, Hubble would be an 80mm triplet APO (if you asked on the refractor forum :roflmao:)

You pick the scope for the target. Small scopes are good for large targets and big scopes are good for small targets.

And scopes in between are good for a little of each.

This is why the large APO is so well respected as an astrograph. It provides surperb off axis illumition over a very large image circle, has high transmission, high contrast, and can be used with focal reducers and focal extenders to get a large variety of image scales.

And by the way.. I have a great paper written by Ken Hutchinsen that has ray traces for the C8, C9, C11, and C14. These ray traces show the illumination level for all these designs over different size image circles using both the redcuer and native configurations. It is an excellent paper, and if you would like a copy, PM me your email address and I will send it to you.

It does not cover the EdgeHD designs, but native they should be somewhat similar. The new Reducers though are far better than the old ones in terms of vignetting in the larger scopes.

One of the main compromises of the standard SCT design is th off axis illumination tradeoff.

Other scopes make even more extreme tradoffs. The Mak Newts have a field that is only fully illuminated over a tiny image cirlce and have illumiontion characteristics that make the SCT look great by comparison.

So, one has to pick one's poison, but if a very wide illuminated field with a large image scale is what you want, get a big astrograph. That is why people sell them.

Don't expect to see much detail in the Ring Nebula if you use a 1" scope.

#28 pbsastro


    Viking 1

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 650
  • Joined: 21 Mar 2007

Posted 10 March 2013 - 07:10 PM

Sorry for creating this thread and then disappearing. I was off with health problems, but am back now.
Meanwhile I checked Celestron EdgeHD white paper pointed out often by Eddgie. It is a wonderful and unique document in that it is very rare that mass-market manufacturers get so honest and open about a product:

It is stated that 11HD and 14HD both have 100% illumination on the central 16mm circle, and 83% illumination at 42mm circle edge , the corners of full-frame chips.
Using the supplied cutout diagrams I made some calculations and got the following:
The diagram focus plane is exactly at 146mm from flange (the recommended distance) for both 11HD and 14HD.
The segment we see at focus plane is exactly 42mm (full-frame diagonal).
If I draw a light cone (using Paint tool) touching the baffle entrance full opening I get exactly 16mm circle for both 11HD and 1HD4.
So all matches perfectly right with the stated values!
Therefore I am quite confident that the stated values are to be trusted.
I any case I would like to check some full-frame flats to confirm the corner 83% value for both 11HD and 14HD.


CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.

Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics