Jump to content


modded PST or solarmax 60,etc?

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
5 replies to this topic

#1 bratboyy2k


    Lift Off

  • -----
  • Posts: 5
  • Joined: 30 Jan 2013

Posted 11 February 2013 - 08:15 PM

hey folks, I'm just slipping back into observing the skies and I was interested in getting a solar telescope. I was looking at the various coronados out there and of course was impressed by the big n flashy telescopes. I noticed people were modding the PST scopes either by self hacking or buying an upgrade.

my question is, what are the pros and cons? I noticed that buying the mod or hacking a mod with a PST pushed the cost up there in the solarmax territory. Which way is a better route? Thank you.

#2 Jim Rosenstock

Jim Rosenstock

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • *****
  • Posts: 6593
  • Joined: 14 Jul 2005
  • Loc: MD, south of the DC Nebula

Posted 11 February 2013 - 08:45 PM

Well, old-school ATM'ers will always prefer the do-it-yourself route, but we're not allowed to even talk about that here...it's a lawyer thing, apparently. :shrug:

Anyway, there are folks out there doing it, and you'll be able to find them. But not here....

In my opinion, though, if you want to jump in at a higher level than the good ol' PST, the next logical step is a Lunt 60. Just sayin'...


#3 bratboyy2k


    Lift Off

  • -----
  • Posts: 5
  • Joined: 30 Jan 2013

Posted 11 February 2013 - 09:09 PM

I understand and being a law graduate I will state that I am asking this question in a PURELY hypothetically. I'm totally into the diy thing but tot pay the same for similar results never made sense to me. So I'm really hoping to get some answers in, of course, a purely hypothetical manner for I will never ever do such a project and never suggest anybody to but if I was to do so, which will never happen, I absolve any and all parties involved that are directly or I indirectly related to this board as random and amateur participants. Wow, that was clear and simple.

#4 sullij1


    Surveyor 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 1600
  • Joined: 08 Nov 2008

Posted 11 February 2013 - 10:19 PM

:D Too funny! DIY works well and “yes” the end cost is similar to a commercial system. So if you want to save yourself some time and frustration (of course that is where the fun is) and do outreach with some confidence in tested engineering, get the commercial device.

Many excellent mods have been presented elsewhere.

[TOS violation Link removed by Moderator]

I hope the posting etiquette is forgiven and you find the solution that is right for you.

Clear Skies!

#5 brianb11213



  • *****
  • Posts: 9047
  • Joined: 25 Feb 2009
  • Loc: 55.215N 6.554W

Posted 12 February 2013 - 04:03 AM

The alternative - if you already have a good quality small refractor, which many of us do - is to obtain a solar hydrogen alpha filter set, these are sold by Lunt and Solarscope and can deliver very good quality indeed at a price which is competitive. Lunt advertise a 50mm diameter front mounting etalon together with a 6mm diameter blocking filter (suitable for scopes with focal length up to approx. 500mm) for $1,346 & this will outperform a PST by a very large margin indeed ... true you will need to buy an adpater to fit the etalon to the front end of your scope tube but this will be a lot less than buying a whole new tube, focuser etc. ... and you can still use the scope for "night time" targets. Fitting a commercial filter set to a scope is AFAIK permitted for discussion in these lists in a way that hacking a PST is not.

#6 Bowmoreman


    Clear enough skies

  • *****
  • Posts: 9162
  • Joined: 11 Sep 2006
  • Loc: Bolton, MA

Posted 12 February 2013 - 11:51 AM

OK, folks. I apologize for being late to moderating this thread; we had a minor little snow storm here in the North East to deal with...

This entire thread is against CN's TOS... I specifically call everyones attention to:

Be Aware! CN will not allow posts dealing with the modification of potentially harmful devices such as green laser pointers, PST's, etc. While the results of a modified GLP or PST may seem attractive, the possible adverse consequences are deemed significant. Any posts dealing with these types of modifications, or linking to sites which feature them, may be removed by the moderator.

I have deleted the link, and locked this thread. Again, such discussions are against our TOS, not matter how "couched" in conditional rhetoric. Thank you for your understanding and participation here on CN.

Dave (Moderator)

CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.

Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics