Jump to content


Photo

Classic Atlas or New Alt/Azm Atlas?

  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 ghataa

ghataa

    Viking 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 625
  • Joined: 20 Jun 2011
  • Loc: Central, NJ

Posted 17 February 2013 - 09:45 PM

Hi All,

I am looking to move to a beefier mount for AP and had basically settled on the Atlas until the new Atlas Pro mount came out. While I appreciate the upgrades on be Pro, I have no interest in alt/azm feature and curious if everything else is essentially equal between the two mounts. For example, weight capacity, ability to do long exposures while guiding etc. The $800 dollar difference is significant and let's me think about other goodies, especially if performance is practically the same for AP.

Thanks,

George

#2 Lane

Lane

    Soyuz

  • -----
  • Posts: 3593
  • Joined: 19 Nov 2007
  • Loc: Frisco, Texas

Posted 18 February 2013 - 03:17 PM

Weight capacity is highter and theoretically the belt drive will make AP better on the new mount.

Having ALT/AZ is really a benefit for those of us that do visual viewing. Keeps the eyepiece at a reasonable position and does not flip the scope upside down, which helps with mirror flop issues in an SCT.

#3 hcsceo

hcsceo

    Vostok 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 197
  • Joined: 14 Oct 2009
  • Loc: Western Nebraska

Posted 18 February 2013 - 03:23 PM

George, I just went through this over the weekend and went with the Classic Atlas. I can't really speak for the Pro version as I've never even seen one, but I didn't want to deal with any issues that might hang up my imaging so went with the tried and true classic mount. I'll never use it in ALT/AZ either so I didn't see a reason to go with the added complexity and risk issues. Looks like it has encoders which could be beneficial if the resolution is good and appears to support 4 extra pounds of weight (Not sure if that really means anything). I currently run a C8 and a C9.25 could be in my future and know the atlas will handle either well. I did want to use EQMod since my imaging is completely robotic now and I've yet to see anyone using EQMod with it so not sure if it will work. Basically, I know the Classic Atlas will work for me and I had too many questions about the PRO to risk it. Plus the added savings puts more money in my pocket for other stuffs. I'm generally not a first revision kind of person and with something this expensive there is no way I'm going to risk my hobby on a bad experience. Not sure any of this helps you but that was my thought process.

#4 EFT

EFT

    Vendor - Deep Space Products

  • *****
  • Vendors
  • Posts: 2546
  • Joined: 07 May 2007
  • Loc: Phoenix, AZ

Posted 19 February 2013 - 12:17 PM

If you have no intention of using the Alt/Az then I would see no reason for going with the Atlas Pro. While they have added a belt drive system, there is a misconception as to what a belt drive may or may not do. There seems to be an idea that a belt drive will not have backlash and will somehow operate better than a spur gear drive. However, these are toothed belts and pulleys that we a talking about and toothed belts and pulleys can have backlash, just like spur gears. In fact, you would probably get less backlash with a high precision set of spur gears than you could with a set of pullies and belts made by different companies. If this were a non-toothed belt system then you would have no backlash, but you could have slippage. Belt stretching can be a concern, but these days most belts are made with materials that are pretty resistant to stretching.

So, I would recommend going with the classic Atlas in your case. You won't really be missing out on anything except the extra cost.

#5 ghataa

ghataa

    Viking 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 625
  • Joined: 20 Jun 2011
  • Loc: Central, NJ

Posted 19 February 2013 - 01:02 PM

Thanks for the responses guys.

Ed and Steve: I really appreciate the recommendation given my AP focus. Thanks for saving me some cash!

Best,

George

#6 Lane

Lane

    Soyuz

  • -----
  • Posts: 3593
  • Joined: 19 Nov 2007
  • Loc: Frisco, Texas

Posted 20 February 2013 - 10:44 PM

I thought the point of the new belt drive mounts was to eliminate periodic error by eliminating the teeth. What good is belt drive with teeth?






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics