Jump to content


CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.

Photo

Cambridge Double Star Atlas

  • Please log in to reply
17 replies to this topic

#1 CelestronDaddy

CelestronDaddy

    Apollo

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 1000
  • Joined: 21 Aug 2009
  • Loc: Central Texas

Posted 20 February 2013 - 07:31 PM

Finally added this one (spiral) to my library. I think it will be a good companion for double stars....

#2 desertstars

desertstars

    ISS

  • *****
  • Posts: 43354
  • Joined: 05 Nov 2003
  • Loc: Tucson, AZ

Posted 20 February 2013 - 11:24 PM

It's become one of my primary resources. Most of my observing these days is done from home, in midtown Tuscon. Good skies for double star observing. I don't go out without the CDSA.

#3 Carl Kolchak

Carl Kolchak

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1094
  • Joined: 02 Aug 2006
  • Loc: Northeast, Florida

Posted 21 February 2013 - 11:59 AM

CelestronDaddy said:

I think it will be a good companion for double stars....


Hi CelestronDaddy,

I agree with you 110%. CDSA has become my favorite out the door atlas. I think of it as an enlarged Pocket Sky Atlas. The PSA is getting harder and harder to see in daylight much less dimmed by a red observing light.

Good design, lays flat, (of course the doubles are marked) decent amount of DSOs id'ed, I like it a lot. I observe from home so I do not need a million faint stars for star hopping to a faint fuzzy, too much light pollution. Enjoy!

peace & clear skies

#4 C_Moon

C_Moon

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1185
  • Joined: 22 Oct 2009
  • Loc: Beneath the arms of Cassiopeia

Posted 21 February 2013 - 12:23 PM

I enjoy CDSA as well and agree that it is a good "enlarged" PSA, although it does not go as deep.

One thing I have trouble with in CDSA, though, is getting to the right chart quickly. I wish there was something like the back cover of PSA that has a whole-sky chart of the bright stars and constellations with the corresponding PSA chart superimposed -- it is quite helpful for getting me to the right chart quickly.

#5 Rick Woods

Rick Woods

    Hubble

  • *****
  • Posts: 18566
  • Joined: 27 Jan 2005
  • Loc: Inner Solar System

Posted 21 February 2013 - 07:32 PM

I enjoy CDSA as well and agree that it is a good "enlarged" PSA, although it does not go as deep.

One thing I have trouble with in CDSA, though, is getting to the right chart quickly. I wish there was something like the back cover of PSA that has a whole-sky chart of the bright stars and constellations with the corresponding PSA chart superimposed -- it is quite helpful for getting me to the right chart quickly.


There is, on pages 26-27. It's a good index, but poorly placed.

#6 CelestronDaddy

CelestronDaddy

    Apollo

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 1000
  • Joined: 21 Aug 2009
  • Loc: Central Texas

Posted 21 February 2013 - 08:32 PM

Thanks for all the comments on the CDSA. I've read a lot on it and had actually never held one but I went ahead and got one based on comments from some of the folks on the Double Star forum. I know some didn't like the layout, whether it was by RA and not constellation and I've heard of some issues with accuracy on the tables. For me though it is going to be very useful from an atlas standpoint. I really like the larger size, say compared to the PSA, and I've heard the star charts might be Mr. Tirion's best. I think it will definitely get used :grin: Thanks....

#7 Carl Kolchak

Carl Kolchak

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1094
  • Joined: 02 Aug 2006
  • Loc: Northeast, Florida

Posted 21 February 2013 - 08:33 PM

C Moon said:

One thing I have trouble with in CDSA, though, is getting to the right chart quickly.


Hi Paul

I'm with you on that one. I have a post-it bookmark for the constellations index on pages 89-90. I also use Astroplanner when I observe, luckily Paul Rodman the programmer for AP, added CDSA pages to the Observation Tab with a column for star atlases. CDSA, S2K, PSA and several more (15?) well known atlases including the elusive Herold-Bobroff atlas are in the column so I can quickly look up any object by page number.

Now I'm not suggesting to go out and buy AP just because of this feature. But I think other software does the same not sure if they include CDSA. My :penny: :penny: worth.

peace & clear skies

#8 CelestronDaddy

CelestronDaddy

    Apollo

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 1000
  • Joined: 21 Aug 2009
  • Loc: Central Texas

Posted 21 February 2013 - 08:55 PM

I enjoy CDSA as well and agree that it is a good "enlarged" PSA, although it does not go as deep.

One thing I have trouble with in CDSA, though, is getting to the right chart quickly. I wish there was something like the back cover of PSA that has a whole-sky chart of the bright stars and constellations with the corresponding PSA chart superimposed -- it is quite helpful for getting me to the right chart quickly.


There is, on pages 26-27. It's a good index, but poorly placed.


I agree and have a post-it as a tab there! Thanks ....
  • rookie likes this

#9 C_Moon

C_Moon

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1185
  • Joined: 22 Oct 2009
  • Loc: Beneath the arms of Cassiopeia

Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:44 AM

I enjoy CDSA as well and agree that it is a good "enlarged" PSA, although it does not go as deep.

One thing I have trouble with in CDSA, though, is getting to the right chart quickly. I wish there was something like the back cover of PSA that has a whole-sky chart of the bright stars and constellations with the corresponding PSA chart superimposed -- it is quite helpful for getting me to the right chart quickly.


There is, on pages 26-27. It's a good index, but poorly placed.


I agree and have a post-it as a tab there! Thanks ....


Yes, a post-it tab is helpful and a good idea.

After comparing both atlases last night, I think the issue is that I was spoiled by the PSA, which was my first only atlas for quite some time. One of the less-touted benefits of the PSA is its chart arrangement. The sky is arranged in intuitive shaped 'gores'. Also, the divisions lines between charts was determined chart-by-chart with a human in the loop, so whole constellations and familiar asterisms (e.g., Big Dipper) are placed on one page whenever possible. The arrangement is quite innovative and I am not doing it justice here, but you can read in the intro to your PSA for more detail.

Anyway, the CDSA is easy enough to navigate, but the PSA was purposefully designed to be quite user-friendly.

#10 Tony Flanders

Tony Flanders

    Voyager 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 13204
  • Joined: 18 May 2006
  • Loc: Cambridge, MA, USA

Posted 22 February 2013 - 09:07 AM

One of the less-touted benefits of the PSA is its chart arrangement. The sky is arranged in intuitive shaped 'gores'.


Interesting. I liked the unconventional "gore" arrangment of the PSA right off the bat, and I have come to like it more the more I use it. I suspect that's because I think of the sky first in terms of RA (i.e. season and time of night) and only second in terms of Dec. That is, after all, how objects are sorted in conventional lists, and how the NGC objects are numbered.

However, many people complain about the PSA's organization and find it counterintuitive.

I like the CDSA's organization just fine except for one thing.

It's great to have the higher-RA map on the left and the lower-RA map on the right whenever there are two facing pages, so that the two maps join into a unified whole. But if you're going to do it that way, you should do it through the entire Dec strip, so that the continuation of the left-hand page comes before and the continuation of the right-hand page comes after.

So, the pages in the CDSA are arranged 2, 0, 5, 3, 8, 6, and so on. A more logical organization (as done in the Millennium Star Atlas and the second edition of Uranometria) would be 23, 21, 20, 18, 17, 15, and so on.
  • rookie likes this

#11 Rich (RLTYS)

Rich (RLTYS)

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • *****
  • Moderators
  • Posts: 6309
  • Joined: 18 Dec 2004
  • Loc: New York (Long Island)

Posted 23 February 2013 - 06:52 AM

I have the CDSA and enjoy useing it. The one thing I don't understand is why the PA is not listed for most double stars? On some stars this can make finding the companion star difficult. :confused:

Rich (RLTYS)

#12 Rick Woods

Rick Woods

    Hubble

  • *****
  • Posts: 18566
  • Joined: 27 Jan 2005
  • Loc: Inner Solar System

Posted 23 February 2013 - 07:49 PM

One of the less-touted benefits of the PSA is its chart arrangement. The sky is arranged in intuitive shaped 'gores'.


Interesting. I liked the unconventional "gore" arrangment of the PSA right off the bat, and I have come to like it more the more I use it. I suspect that's because I think of the sky first in terms of RA (i.e. season and time of night) and only second in terms of Dec. That is, after all, how objects are sorted in conventional lists, and how the NGC objects are numbered.


Yeah, that's something I liked right off about the MSA, too. As soon as I saw the arrangement, I thought "Well, duh, that makes way more sense."

#13 drollere

drollere

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1915
  • Joined: 02 Feb 2010
  • Loc: sebastopol, california

Posted 04 December 2015 - 04:26 PM

i've just gotten word that the CDSA 2nd edition has been printed and delivered to the publisher. it should be available retail in a few weeks.

 

for those interested to browse the new introduction and examine the layout and content of the target list, use the "look inside" option for the CDSA on amazon.com. the target list is now organized by constellation, then by right ascension. each target is described by:

 

bayer, flamsteed, variable star label

double star catalog ID

list of components, with visually unresolvable components (for example, spectroscopic components) enclosed by parentheses

celestial coordinates

visual magnitudes

position angle(s)

separation(s)

distance from the sun (in parsecs)

spectral type(s)

HD number, SAO number

 

the SAO number is widely used in planetarium software and GoTo mount handsets. the HD number is the more common identification in the astronomical research literature.


  • Daniel Mounsey, desertstars, rookie and 1 other like this

#14 Michael Rapp

Michael Rapp

    Soyuz

  • *****
  • Posts: 3607
  • Joined: 26 Apr 2004
  • Loc: Dickinson, TX

Posted 06 December 2015 - 12:05 AM

Bruce,

 

Really looking forward to it....had it on pre-order for some time now!



#15 opticsguy

opticsguy

    Viking 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 802
  • Joined: 02 Feb 2009
  • Loc: Washington State

Posted 06 December 2015 - 10:23 AM

Why are these books valued at $200 to $300?  (1st editions) (amazon) I would think maybe $20???



#16 Rick Woods

Rick Woods

    Hubble

  • *****
  • Posts: 18566
  • Joined: 27 Jan 2005
  • Loc: Inner Solar System

Posted 06 December 2015 - 12:01 PM

Why are these books valued at $200 to $300?  (1st editions) (amazon) I would think maybe $20???

 

Probably they paid attention to P.T. Barnum ("one born every minute").



#17 Oscar56

Oscar56

    Viking 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 569
  • Joined: 25 Jan 2013
  • Loc: Summerland, BC

Posted 20 December 2015 - 01:08 AM

With the understanding that Rick W and others will say that you can never have enough atlases what is the attraction to the CDSA over the PSA and Interstellarum which are already in my library?



#18 Rick Woods

Rick Woods

    Hubble

  • *****
  • Posts: 18566
  • Joined: 27 Jan 2005
  • Loc: Inner Solar System

Posted 20 December 2015 - 02:17 AM

It specifically labels a lot of doubles, and gives info on them in tables. A lot of them are just unnamed, anonymous doubles in other atlases. It's a special-interest atlas, like the Herschel Object atlas but maybe a bit more useful.




CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.



Recent Reviews


Imaging/Sketching Contest






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics