Jump to content


Photo

How can I shoot this better

  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

#1 KD58

KD58

    Ranger 4

  • *****
  • Posts: 312
  • Joined: 23 Nov 2012
  • Loc: West Texas

Posted 24 February 2013 - 12:12 AM

I've been trying to shoot the moon with my Canon 5D Mk II attached to my ES 127 mm triplet refractor. I had the camera attached to my laptop and controlled through BYE. I adjusted focus while viewing in BYE but this is the best I got . It has a little contrast added in PS but I just cant get my images to be sharper. I'm going to try a Bahtinov mask tomorrow but wonder if there is any other advice. I've never used a Bahtinov and will be using it with the DSLR attached to the telescope and either viewed in live view or through BYE.

http://www.flickr.co.../in/photostream

#2 Jeff2011

Jeff2011

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1805
  • Joined: 01 Jan 2013
  • Loc: Sugar Land, TX

Posted 24 February 2013 - 12:23 AM

I found the bahtinov mask easy to use and took the guess work out of focusing. You can even use it with live view if you zoom in to a star.

#3 Dave12345

Dave12345

    Vostok 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 102
  • Joined: 09 Jan 2013

Posted 24 February 2013 - 06:42 AM

That looks good to me. Something i have recently realized, since is started photographing the Moon about a month ago, is that fully lit, or full Moons always lack detail, with partial moons are always detailed, and don't lack detail or focus. There is excellent crater detail etc, but when you don't have the shadows, the pictures don't look as good.

#4 Driven1

Driven1

    Vostok 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 167
  • Joined: 19 Aug 2010
  • Loc: N. Central PA near CSSP

Posted 24 February 2013 - 09:06 AM

Probably better for focusing the Moon and other Planets is the Hartmann Mask. Bahtinov's are great for distant objects, but might be difficult for something as close as the Moon. http://www.billyard-.../Hartmann.shtml

In focusing on a Star with a Bahtinov and then going back to the Moon, the shot will be out of focus due to the Moon being so close.

You might also try a "Moon Filter" to bring out more contrast and detail on bright Moon shots.

#5 NeilMac

NeilMac

    Gemini

  • -----
  • Posts: 3077
  • Joined: 25 Sep 2010
  • Loc: MedHat, AB, Canada

Posted 24 February 2013 - 05:54 PM

To improve detail add layers of contrast and overlay.

#6 rigel123

rigel123

    Voyager 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 10747
  • Joined: 29 Jun 2009
  • Loc: SW Ohio

Posted 24 February 2013 - 09:12 PM

Like others have noted, that's a good pic, if you want more contrast, image the moon long before it is full, it just washes everything out. It's nice to have some shadows to work with.

#7 KD58

KD58

    Ranger 4

  • *****
  • Posts: 312
  • Joined: 23 Nov 2012
  • Loc: West Texas

Posted 25 February 2013 - 07:29 AM

Thanks for all the great advice and comments. I do appreciate all the help given.

#8 RedLionNJ

RedLionNJ

    Viking 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 893
  • Joined: 29 Dec 2009
  • Loc: Red Lion, NJ, USA

Posted 25 February 2013 - 06:11 PM

Probably better for focusing the Moon and other Planets is the Hartmann Mask. Bahtinov's are great for distant objects, but might be difficult for something as close as the Moon. http://www.billyard-.../Hartmann.shtml

In focusing on a Star with a Bahtinov and then going back to the Moon, the shot will be out of focus due to the Moon being so close.


This is a myth. Are you seriously saying your focus is so sensitive you have to refocus between something at a couple hundred thousand miles and something at a few light years? Do the math... there is no measurable difference in the focal point.

Grant

#9 Driven1

Driven1

    Vostok 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 167
  • Joined: 19 Aug 2010
  • Loc: N. Central PA near CSSP

Posted 25 February 2013 - 07:10 PM

Perhaps it's a myth, however in my experience with my scope, I HAVE to refocus for the Moon after looking at something like, let's say Jupiter. Star focusing with a Bahtinov works great for the distant planets, but for the Moon, I have to re-focus. Just sayin'. That's My experience with My Scope.

Anyone else have to refocus on the Moon after looking at more distant objects?

#10 Ratchet

Ratchet

    Vostok 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 154
  • Joined: 07 Aug 2011
  • Loc: Tallahassee, FL

Posted 25 February 2013 - 08:19 PM

The moon and a star should be well into the "infinity" range of any lens or telescope. I think the reason you may have to refocus for the moon is due to the fact it is very large and the accommodation of your eye requires one to be in a different sweet spot than perfect center focus in order to pan around with the eye and have everything in focus since most scopes and eyepieces will produce field curvature.

A moon filter will just reduce brightness.

I think the OP image is pretty typical for a single shot although there is some weird oil painting effect to the image.

If you aren't using mirror lock up, try it and it may give a bit more sharpness by reducing shake on the optical train. Processed video is the way to go for moon shots.






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics