Jump to content


Photo

Whats going on here in pempro????

  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

#1 powerstroke01

powerstroke01

    Viking 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 531
  • Joined: 19 Jun 2007
  • Loc: Western Sierra Nevada Foothills

Posted 28 February 2013 - 10:44 PM

Im lost. I thought my y axis was my RA. But i dont know now!
This is with my Hypertuned G11 with Ovision worm.
Heres the x axis
Posted Image

And the y axis
Posted Image

#2 orlyandico

orlyandico

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • *****
  • Posts: 5745
  • Joined: 10 Aug 2009
  • Loc: Singapore

Posted 28 February 2013 - 11:00 PM

It looks like your X axis is the RA because the X axis shows the obvious sinusoidal shape of periodic error. the DEC axis would not show that shape.

If you went through the calibration wizard, pempro should correctly identify the RA axis.

#3 powerstroke01

powerstroke01

    Viking 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 531
  • Joined: 19 Jun 2007
  • Loc: Western Sierra Nevada Foothills

Posted 28 February 2013 - 11:10 PM

Ive got another question.
Heres my refined graph. Is that right that my periodic error should double?
Posted Image

#4 orlyandico

orlyandico

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • *****
  • Posts: 5745
  • Joined: 10 Aug 2009
  • Loc: Singapore

Posted 28 February 2013 - 11:15 PM

it should not double. what is probably happening is that the periodic error correction curve is not the inverted PE curve.

this should not happen! pempro should be smart enough.. are you using direct PEC curve upload or training via the ST4 port?

regardless, what you can do is refine curve, invert it manually, then train that. the PE should go right down.

but a caution, once you're below around 2" p-p it's hard to improve things, because measuring the PE becomes hard (the atmospheric seeing is generally 2" range and makes consistent measurement of the PE difficult).

#5 korborh

korborh

    Viking 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 895
  • Joined: 29 Jan 2011
  • Loc: Arizona

Posted 28 February 2013 - 11:38 PM

Atmospheric seeing is random so it should not appear with a period in the freq spectrum. A slow 2" PE can still be measured in bad seeing.

#6 WadeH237

WadeH237

    Apollo

  • -----
  • Posts: 1358
  • Joined: 24 Feb 2007
  • Loc: Snohomish, WA

Posted 01 March 2013 - 01:53 AM

PEMPro has an option to invert the curve. No need to try to alter it manually. The instructions even say to do this in the event that the PE doubles after applying the curve.

Also, my Celestron mounts all use X as the RA axis. I haven't checked on the AP yet, but I suspect that it's the same.

#7 orlyandico

orlyandico

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • *****
  • Posts: 5745
  • Joined: 10 Aug 2009
  • Loc: Singapore

Posted 01 March 2013 - 06:02 AM

The x vs y for the ra is all down to camera orientation....

#8 Ray Gralak

Ray Gralak

    Vendor (PEMPro)

  • -----
  • Vendors
  • Posts: 382
  • Joined: 19 Apr 2008

Posted 01 March 2013 - 09:38 AM

Im lost. I thought my y axis was my RA. But i dont know now!
This is with my Hypertuned G11 with Ovision worm.


If you run the calibration wizard then PEMPro will de-rotate the RA axis to show as the X-axis. You can override this behavior in the Settings menu, but I recommend you keep the de-rotation enabled.

-Ray Gralak

#9 Ray Gralak

Ray Gralak

    Vendor (PEMPro)

  • -----
  • Vendors
  • Posts: 382
  • Joined: 19 Apr 2008

Posted 01 March 2013 - 09:47 AM

Ive got another question.
Heres my refined graph. Is that right that my periodic error should double?

It depends... if the blue curve is the PE after applying the initial PEC curve, then it looks like it needs to be inverted and reloaded into the mount. This can happen if the calibration wizard's last step (step 4) wasn't done or that the manufacturer's implementation for PEC cell values is inverted from what PEMPro uses.

-Ray

#10 WadeH237

WadeH237

    Apollo

  • -----
  • Posts: 1358
  • Joined: 24 Feb 2007
  • Loc: Snohomish, WA

Posted 01 March 2013 - 10:45 AM

The x vs y for the ra is all down to camera orientation....


There are two considerations.

There is the X and Y position of the guide star in the image. This is dependent on the camera orientation. I generally don't associate X or Y image directions with the mount's axes. I have a camera rotator, so my camera's orientation changes depending on my target and framing.

When I think of X and Y in the context of guiding and periodic error, I think of the mount's axes. All the mounts that I have worked with have the RA axis on X, and the dec axis on Y. This is what I thought that the OP was talking about.

-Wade

#11 orlyandico

orlyandico

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • *****
  • Posts: 5745
  • Joined: 10 Aug 2009
  • Loc: Singapore

Posted 01 March 2013 - 10:53 AM

thanks Wade, Ray. i didn't know that X is RA canonically.. I just can spot the RA from the wiggles :D

#12 powerstroke01

powerstroke01

    Viking 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 531
  • Joined: 19 Jun 2007
  • Loc: Western Sierra Nevada Foothills

Posted 01 March 2013 - 11:12 AM

Ive got another question.
Heres my refined graph. Is that right that my periodic error should double?

It depends... if the blue curve is the PE after applying the initial PEC curve, then it looks like it needs to be inverted and reloaded into the mount. This can happen if the calibration wizard's last step (step 4) wasn't done or that the manufacturer's implementation for PEC cell values is inverted from what PEMPro uses.

-Ray

Thanks Ray! I did invert the curve and the pe was MUCH better. I still need to play with it some more.
And thats good to know about the axis!
Thanks again.






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics