Jump to content


Photo

A new way to look at aperture

  • Please log in to reply
51 replies to this topic

#1 MikeBOKC

MikeBOKC

    Aurora

  • *****
  • Posts: 4646
  • Joined: 10 May 2010
  • Loc: Oklahoma City, OK

Posted 01 March 2013 - 07:46 PM

So like most here I have suffered from aperturitis at times. One possible treatment is to look at our available aperture in total . . . so I grabbed the calculator and found that I have in my garage a grand total of 33 inches of aperture! Now if they just made a quinto-viewer . . .

What's your total aperture? See, it can be reassuring!

#2 Doc Willie

Doc Willie

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1687
  • Joined: 31 Mar 2010
  • Loc: Mid-Hudson Valley, NY, USA

Posted 01 March 2013 - 08:54 PM

Is that square inches? If not, this is a flawed way to sum aperture. Five 2 inches do not equal one 10 inch diameter.

#3 Goodchild

Goodchild

    Viking 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 884
  • Joined: 31 Dec 2008

Posted 01 March 2013 - 11:17 PM

Sure it does. We're talking about aperture, not area. Besides, the OP is trying (I assume) to introduce a somewhat lighthearted thread to determine how many scopes/optics one has.

37 for me.

#4 korborh

korborh

    Viking 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 895
  • Joined: 29 Jan 2011
  • Loc: Arizona

Posted 01 March 2013 - 11:35 PM

19 ... still a teenager ;)

#5 cheapersleeper

cheapersleeper

    Gemini

  • *****
  • Posts: 3377
  • Joined: 22 Jan 2010
  • Loc: Sachse TX

Posted 02 March 2013 - 02:16 AM

36!!! :whee: :whee: :whee: :whee: :whee:

#6 GlennLeDrew

GlennLeDrew

    Voyager 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 10988
  • Joined: 17 Jun 2008
  • Loc: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Posted 02 March 2013 - 02:20 AM

2 * 2" + 2 * 2.4" + 2 * 4" = 16.8".

They might be midgets, but at least binoculars automatically double up!

#7 Jon Isaacs

Jon Isaacs

    ISS

  • *****
  • Posts: 44715
  • Joined: 16 Jun 2004
  • Loc: San Diego and Boulevard, CA

Posted 02 March 2013 - 06:34 AM

An interesting way to look at things. A rough calculation is 130 inches of aperture and somewhere around 24 scopes, some quite large, most small.

Binoculars not included.

Jon

#8 Startraffic

Startraffic

    Viking 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 801
  • Joined: 12 Feb 2006
  • Loc: Lat. 39.143345, Long. -77.174802

Posted 02 March 2013 - 07:11 AM

Hmmm,
14.5"Folded Newt+10"SNT+8"Newt+6"Newt+6"RC+3.54"(90mmETX)Cat+6"Acro=54.54"
How about this 360.35sqin of aperture?

Clear Dark Skies
Startraffic
39.138274 -77.168898

#9 City Kid

City Kid

    Vanguard

  • *****
  • Posts: 2375
  • Joined: 06 May 2009
  • Loc: Northern Indiana

Posted 02 March 2013 - 07:21 AM

970.85mm. Or in inches that would be 38.2" but it sounds more impressive in mm.

#10 Ed D

Ed D

    Gemini

  • *****
  • Posts: 3111
  • Joined: 30 Apr 2010
  • Loc: Sunny South Florida

Posted 02 March 2013 - 07:53 AM

I thought this might be interesting so I added up the aperture of my current scopes. :jump:
WOW, was it depressing! :(
So, I added the aperture of the Dob I'm currently building. :)
Guess what? Now I'm really depressed. :bawling:

Not really, I'm actually very happy with what I have. :thewave: But so far I take the prize for least total aperture. :foreheadslap:

Ed D

#11 ahopp

ahopp

    Messenger

  • -----
  • Posts: 402
  • Joined: 24 May 2012

Posted 02 March 2013 - 08:02 AM

1013.71(39.91") includes my L glass canon lenses, they cost more than a good APO so I'm count'n 'm.

Tony

#12 starrancher

starrancher

    Mercury-Atlas

  • *****
  • Posts: 2960
  • Joined: 09 Jun 2009
  • Loc: Northern Arizona

Posted 02 March 2013 - 08:29 AM

I thought this might be interesting so I added up the aperture of my current scopes. :jump:
WOW, was it depressing! :(
So, I added the aperture of the Dob I'm currently building. :)
Guess what? Now I'm really depressed. :bawling:

Not really, I'm actually very happy with what I have. :thewave: But so far I take the prize for least total aperture. :foreheadslap:

Ed D


So ,.... What's the total Ed ?

#13 starrancher

starrancher

    Mercury-Atlas

  • *****
  • Posts: 2960
  • Joined: 09 Jun 2009
  • Loc: Northern Arizona

Posted 02 March 2013 - 08:45 AM

AR5 = 5"
SN8 = 8"
11TE= 4.5"
7T = 2.4"
66TE= 2"
Total = 21.9"

Modest yes , but with the awesome rural northern Arizona skies , it's unreal what an 8" scope will pull .

Oh , I forgot my 10x50s . That adds another 4" !
So I guess that kicks me up to a grand total of 25.9" .

#14 Martin Lyons

Martin Lyons

    Messenger

  • *****
  • Posts: 416
  • Joined: 06 Oct 2008
  • Loc: Cape Town, South Africa

Posted 02 March 2013 - 08:49 AM

Roughly, 52"

Oops :foreheadslap: forgot the 16" GSO and the 12" Cass. :o

Make that 80" :help:

#15 starrancher

starrancher

    Mercury-Atlas

  • *****
  • Posts: 2960
  • Joined: 09 Jun 2009
  • Loc: Northern Arizona

Posted 02 March 2013 - 08:52 AM

Do you have a pict of that folded Newt John ?

#16 rathbaster

rathbaster

    Viking 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 925
  • Joined: 21 Mar 2008
  • Loc: East Bridgewater, MA

Posted 02 March 2013 - 09:09 AM

20" in four scopes.
I never realized....

#17 MikeBOKC

MikeBOKC

    Aurora

  • *****
  • Posts: 4646
  • Joined: 10 May 2010
  • Loc: Oklahoma City, OK

Posted 02 March 2013 - 09:26 AM

Yes folks this is strictly for fun . . . just thought it might be a hoot sometime in conversation to say "16 inch Dob? That's nothing! I got 33 inches of aperture at home!"

#18 catboat

catboat

    Viking 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 669
  • Joined: 01 Dec 2009
  • Loc: Maine

Posted 02 March 2013 - 12:33 PM

It's a bit embarrassing. If I include unmounted optics… 127"
:p

#19 Mark Costello

Mark Costello

    Gemini

  • *****
  • Posts: 3122
  • Joined: 08 Mar 2005
  • Loc: Matthews, NC, USA

Posted 02 March 2013 - 01:26 PM

I'm happy right now with the job my 5" aperture is doing for me... :)

Again, not counting binoculars....

#20 zjc26138

zjc26138

    Loved By All

  • *****
  • Posts: 8224
  • Joined: 24 Feb 2005
  • Loc: Mingo Junction, Ohio

Posted 02 March 2013 - 01:34 PM

15" of usable aperture for me.

If you count my TMB and AR5, both cells are currently out of their tubes,then I have 25" of aperture.

#21 JayinUT

JayinUT

    I'm not Sleepy

  • *****
  • Posts: 3933
  • Joined: 19 Sep 2008
  • Loc: Utah

Posted 02 March 2013 - 02:30 PM

28 inches with 4 scope.

#22 EFT

EFT

    Vendor - Deep Space Products

  • *****
  • Vendors
  • Posts: 2563
  • Joined: 07 May 2007
  • Loc: Phoenix, AZ

Posted 02 March 2013 - 03:04 PM

About 79" with 13 scopes. Woof. More than I thought and I keep remembering one more every time I think I have them all. Probably time to thin that down a bit.

#23 George N

George N

    Mercury-Atlas

  • *****
  • Posts: 2824
  • Joined: 19 May 2006
  • Loc: Binghamton & Indian Lake NY

Posted 02 March 2013 - 04:03 PM

If I add up the total aperture that I can actually *use* under my endlessly cloudy and snowy skies, the answer is zero! ….at least lately.

#24 coopman

coopman

    Gemini

  • *****
  • Posts: 3477
  • Joined: 23 Apr 2006
  • Loc: South Louisiana

Posted 02 March 2013 - 04:18 PM

41.7 inches from my 7 scopes.

#25 GeneT

GeneT

    Ely Kid

  • *****
  • Posts: 12838
  • Joined: 07 Nov 2008
  • Loc: South Texas

Posted 02 March 2013 - 06:04 PM

Since the human pupil has a focal length of 17 mm, it is f/2.4 and yields 0.17 per mm of aperture. About 2.5 mm is
the photopic (light-adapted) diameter of the eye. I own a 12.5 inch (if I figured correctly, about 318mm) , F5 telescope. That's a lot of eyeballs. :grin:






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics