Jump to content


Photo

Lt 8 vs Lx200 8" ACF Whats the big difference?

  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 IamRichard

IamRichard

    Lift Off

  • -----
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 10 Sep 2011

Posted 15 March 2013 - 02:40 AM

I have noticed the Lx200 ACF sells more than twice the price of a LT 8.

Besides the sturdier mount, is there any other major difference to warrant the price?

Thanks,

#2 thesubwaypusher

thesubwaypusher

    Viking 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 970
  • Joined: 08 Jul 2004
  • Loc: New York City

Posted 16 March 2013 - 10:45 PM

You may not like that crinkly finish anyway, so consider Celestron.

#3 Bill Steen

Bill Steen

    Mariner 2

  • -----
  • Posts: 234
  • Joined: 15 Dec 2012
  • Loc: Broken Arrow, Oklahoma

Posted 23 March 2013 - 10:22 PM

The LT is intended more for "take it out on a whim in the back yard." It is light weight and easy to transport. It is intended really for visual astronomy. The LX-200 is the heavy duty cruiser that is intended for very serious astronomy and astrophotography. It is very strong, but heavy. It can be set up with a wedge for equatorial operation (necessary for the really high end astrophotography), while the LT or LS are not.

#4 REC

REC

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • *****
  • Posts: 5488
  • Joined: 20 Oct 2010
  • Loc: NC

Posted 24 March 2013 - 09:23 AM

Same optics though.....nice views to the edge with the ACF.






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics