Posted 18 March 2013 - 06:39 PM
If the equipment works well as is supported by Meade with spares, this will be game changer for many. Compare a Celestron C14 Edge HD on a CGE pro to the Meade LX850 14". Just $1000 difference with the guider and software integrated and only because Celestron dropped the price of the package $1000. . It just has to live up to the expectations and have replacement parts available. Integrated solutions are only good if the integrated parts are replaceable.
Posted 18 March 2013 - 07:00 PM
Malik, Are you accusing the beta testers of lying? Because that's what it sounds to me that you are saying. If you have evidence of this then you should post your evidence. If not you should apologise.
Tony, I see you are getting LX850; are you in any kind of agreement with Meade, beta tester or otherwise of any sort? I ask this because Jason, Michael, etc. all fall in that category. Regards
I'm sick and tired of all these insinuations and half veiled allegations. If people don't trust beta testers to give honest information then they should say so so that the testers do not waste their time posting on CN.
Posted 18 March 2013 - 07:19 PM
Posted 18 March 2013 - 07:21 PM
If people don't trust beta testers to give honest information then they should say so
Im not so sure its that simple.
As per prev posts, the beta testers are under NDAs,
hence cant always give honest opinions on whats going on,
( as it may get fixed pre release ).
Its only after general release to the masses
that the warts ( if there are any ) can be openly discussed.
Andrew Johansen Melbourne Australia
Posted 18 March 2013 - 07:56 PM
Not a all; beta testers are bound by different covenants, that's all. If you look back, it was partly the beta testers that led to the demise of LX800; how could they have signed off? Regards
Neither Jason or I were beta testers on the LX800. I sure hope you don't include me in that. Have people forgotten that it was me that brought all the problems out in the open that probably hurt Meade quite a bit? You could almost hear the cussing taking place in Meade HQ directed at me. I don't know who the original beta testers were either and I agree they didn't catch anything.
If you hear me say anything good at all you can be assured it is 100% true. If I say something negative you can be assured it is 100% true. If I say nothing at all it is a percentage true.
Posted 18 March 2013 - 09:20 PM
OK, what ISO would you like. Also, would you prefer a DSO or a star field?
1) Star fields (Something with stars from edge to edge)
2) 45deg up & 1h either side of flip.
2) ISO 800
3) Starlock guided
4) RAW uncalibrated frames
Posted 18 March 2013 - 11:38 PM
Posted 19 March 2013 - 01:26 AM
Posted 19 March 2013 - 01:40 AM
Posted 19 March 2013 - 02:06 AM
For the data you are looking for, it is better to use PEMPro or something similar. Because that will also tell you how smooth the PE curve is. That would tell you a lot more than looking at how streaky the stars are.
Posted 19 March 2013 - 11:33 AM
I'd be interested in seeing the following on the production units.
Starlock assisted PEC. How well does it work?
Starlock assisted Drift alignment. How accurate is it?
Starlock auto rate calibration. How do the reported values work for you?
Go-To pointing and HPP. How accurate?
Long unprocessed .fits format exposures. Minimum of 10minutes.
Post screenshots of the PEMPRO screen and the ccd inspector screen. Post log files for Alph. Speaking of whom, where has he been lately?
Now with the exception of logs for Alph, I've done everything else on my beta non-production unit. I have those results. Would be nice to compare with production results to see what if anything has changed.
Posted 20 March 2013 - 11:44 AM
Post log files for Alph. Speaking of whom, where has he been lately?
I am still around just staying away from psycho talk. PHD or MaximDL autoguoider logs would be very helpful in evaluating differential drift/flexure. The logs should be recorded with the main camera when the starlock is autoguiding. Simply set up your main camera for auto guiding and disable the guider output. To make the data analysis easier, align your camera with RA and Dec coordinates. For the most accurate analysis the camera angle should be known.
Posted 20 March 2013 - 12:26 PM
Posted 20 March 2013 - 12:44 PM
You have waited a long time. You should get to enjoy life.
Posted 20 March 2013 - 01:05 PM