Jump to content


Photo

CG-4 & EQ3, same mount?

  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 maroubra_boy

maroubra_boy

    Vendor - Gondwana Telescopes

  • -----
  • Vendors
  • Posts: 531
  • Joined: 08 Sep 2009
  • Loc: Sydney, Australia

Posted 23 March 2013 - 07:15 PM

Hi all,

Are the Celestron CG-4 & the EQ3 the same mount with a different name? I've got an EQ3 & want to put clock drive on it, & I've come across a dual axis set for a CG-4 at a good price. Any thoughts?

Alex.

#2 joelimite

joelimite

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1787
  • Joined: 01 Sep 2008
  • Loc: Colorado Springs, CO

Posted 23 March 2013 - 10:17 PM

Don't quote me for certain, but my understanding is they are one and the same.

#3 mdowns

mdowns

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1676
  • Joined: 12 Jun 2010
  • Loc: Englewood,FL

Posted 23 March 2013 - 10:22 PM

Can you post a pic?

#4 watcher

watcher

    Vanguard

  • *****
  • Posts: 2120
  • Joined: 21 Nov 2007
  • Loc: St. Louis, MO

Posted 25 March 2013 - 09:40 PM

They are indeed the very same mount. just a difference in the legs. The drives will work for either.

#5 maroubra_boy

maroubra_boy

    Vendor - Gondwana Telescopes

  • -----
  • Vendors
  • Posts: 531
  • Joined: 08 Sep 2009
  • Loc: Sydney, Australia

Posted 26 March 2013 - 12:09 AM

Thanks for that folks. That's all I needed to read, :)

#6 Geo.

Geo.

    Mercury-Atlas

  • *****
  • Posts: 2954
  • Joined: 01 Oct 2008
  • Loc: Upstate NY

Posted 29 March 2013 - 08:24 PM

Alas, the Celestron German mount #4 is everyone else's EQ-3. The CG-3 is, you guessed it, an EQ-2. And the CG-5 an EQ-4. Wonder what the CG-1 and 2 were?

#7 Jon Isaacs

Jon Isaacs

    ISS

  • *****
  • Posts: 44361
  • Joined: 16 Jun 2004
  • Loc: San Diego and Boulevard, CA

Posted 29 March 2013 - 09:12 PM

They are indeed the very same mount. just a difference in the legs. The drives will work for either.


I have never verified this but if I remember correctly, there were at least 2 versions of the EQ-3 mount and they required different drives.

I have an older EQ-3, its more than 10 years old, it's fitted with Celestron CG-4 drives. The stepper motor drives that are used with these mounts are slow and if there is any slop, they are frustratingly slow. I finally unhooked the Declination drive and replaced it with a slow motion cable.. must faster and more accurate.

If I were to do it over again, I would buy the single axis drive.

Jon

#8 watcher

watcher

    Vanguard

  • *****
  • Posts: 2120
  • Joined: 21 Nov 2007
  • Loc: St. Louis, MO

Posted 29 March 2013 - 09:25 PM

Single axis drive is definitely the way to go IMO.

Jon. Thanks for the info. Anybody know if this is a fact? I didn't think the design was that old. I thought that before the current EQ-3 design, meant you had a Polaris.






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics