Jump to content


Photo

Mount for astrophotography and around 18kg load

  • Please log in to reply
26 replies to this topic

#26 Raginar

Raginar

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • *****
  • Posts: 6138
  • Joined: 19 Oct 2010
  • Loc: Rapid CIty, SD

Posted 02 April 2013 - 02:32 PM

Ed, really good advice. I saw the same thing with my CGEM. Went big, around 35# with 10" SCT, piggybacked refractor, CCD, etc, and it was a PITA. Reduced it down to a 5" SCT and a finder-guider? It was a dream.

Buy the best mount you can. And, if you can't afford the mount for the scope, wait or go with a smaller scope.

#27 andysea

andysea

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1492
  • Joined: 03 Sep 2010
  • Loc: Seattle, WA

Posted 02 April 2013 - 07:01 PM

+1 for Ed's advice. Depending on the camera that the OP uses, increasing focal length might not bring any real advantages anyway. Much better to invest on a higher end mount and then upgrade the optics at a later time. Based on my experience the mount and the camera are the two most important factors when doing AP.
The optics are important but as long as they are decent - and the 120ED I believe is highly regarded - they are fine.

Andy






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics