Jump to content


Photo

STF-8300m owners..

  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

#1 Phil Hosey

Phil Hosey

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1626
  • Joined: 29 Oct 2008
  • Loc: LaGrange, GA

Posted 17 August 2013 - 12:21 PM

What filter wheel are you using? I assume most are using the SBIG FW designed for the camera, but I wonder if I could use a different one, say, the Starlight Xpress. I like the fact that its USB powered so I don't have to run more cables. And as far as filters, can I used 1.25" or am I going to have to spring for larger?

#2 Eddie R

Eddie R

    Vostok 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 104
  • Joined: 02 Jul 2011

Posted 17 August 2013 - 12:38 PM

I use the SX USB wheel and 36mm filters. 1.25" will not cover the sensor.

#3 Rick J

Rick J

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • *****
  • Posts: 5665
  • Joined: 01 Mar 2008
  • Loc: Mantrap Lake, MN

Posted 17 August 2013 - 12:54 PM

Doesn't the SBIG wheels for that camera just plug directly into the camera with no other cable involved? It gets its power and USB for guider from the camera's power and USB line if a guider wheel. Going with a USB powered wheel would actually add one or more cables over the SBIG wheels. Also they lock into position removing the chance for positional errors.

You might want to consider the QSI 8300 with built in filter wheel. Saves a cable as well but does need one to the guider. That added cable has the advantage that it can guide while downloading. The SBIG guider/FW stops guiding while downloading. For some mounts that can mean you need to add a delay to allow the guider to recenter the guide star before going on to the next frame. Though it is fast enough to download a frame that most mounts won't have this issue.

The QSI can use your 1.25" filters in its internal wheel as it is right in front of the chip. Others are best served with the 36mm filters as they are further from the chip and likely would vignette except in high f ratio systems. I'd go with at least the 36mm filters when using a separate wheel.

Rick

#4 buckeyestargazer

buckeyestargazer

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1891
  • Joined: 12 Jan 2008
  • Loc: IN, USA

Posted 17 August 2013 - 01:32 PM

Phil,
Your question is of interest to me because I am hoping to soon switch to a STF-8300m also. I currently have an Atik 383L/EFW2 filter wheel/Atik OAG and I love the kit, but I have an opportunity on a good deal for an STF-8300.

I'm going to try using the STF with the Atik filter wheel, which shouldn't be a problem as far as I can tell.

Regarding using 1.25" filters; I think it depends on the speed of your scope. I use 1.25" filters with my Atik 383 down to f/5.4 with just a little bit of vignetting in the corners which is easily corrected with flats. The camera backfocus of the STF and 383L are identical at 17.5mm, so I'm going to try using my 1.25" filters with the STF, and I anticipate that working just fine in my system. Faster than f/5 and I'm not sure if 1.25" filters would work very well.

#5 gezak22

gezak22

    Viking 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 845
  • Joined: 15 Aug 2004
  • Loc: On far side of moon. Send help.

Posted 17 August 2013 - 01:42 PM

I like the fact that its USB powered so I don't have to run more cables.


I don't think this argument is correct. The STF FW connects to the camera with a cable and that's how the FW gets its power. Your alternative would run a cable from the SX FW to your laptop which to me sounds like a compromise as this cable can get caught in the wind. But if you have all your wiring inside the mount it's not a big deal I guess.

Or am I misunderstanding what you are saying?

#6 pfile

pfile

    Gemini

  • -----
  • Posts: 3163
  • Joined: 14 Jun 2009

Posted 17 August 2013 - 01:58 PM

yes the sbig filter wheel connects to the camera with a DB9 connector which i believe carries i2c (and power). that interface is controllable via the usb port on the camera.

#7 Phil Hosey

Phil Hosey

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1626
  • Joined: 29 Oct 2008
  • Loc: LaGrange, GA

Posted 17 August 2013 - 02:18 PM

I like the fact that its USB powered so I don't have to run more cables.


I don't think this argument is correct. The STF FW connects to the camera with a cable and that's how the FW gets its power. Your alternative would run a cable from the SX FW to your laptop which to me sounds like a compromise as this cable can get caught in the wind. But if you have all your wiring inside the mount it's not a big deal I guess.

Or am I misunderstanding what you are saying?


I think you are correct.. I had not thought about that fact that the ST-8300 FW gets its power etc, from the camera. In that respect it would be a better option, except that it costs twice as much.

#8 Dr Benway

Dr Benway

    Viking 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 656
  • Joined: 27 Mar 2008
  • Loc: Abilene, TX

Posted 17 August 2013 - 02:38 PM

I usually use the Starlight Xpress FW, but also have used the Optec IFW with good results. I am currently populating a 7 slot 36mm SX carousel with Astrodon filters. I plan to use it with the STF-8300M and QHY22.

John

#9 JoseBorrero

JoseBorrero

    Gemini

  • *****
  • Posts: 3137
  • Joined: 04 Sep 2009
  • Loc: Puerto Rico Island

Posted 17 August 2013 - 05:33 PM

I believe some 8300 chip support 1.25" filters in f/5, some models, atik, qsi etc

#10 tjugo

tjugo

    Viking 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 942
  • Joined: 06 Nov 2007

Posted 17 August 2013 - 05:54 PM

Hi,

I have a STF8300, nice camera, the only weak link is the cooling, it 'only' cools down to -36C from ambient. I highly recommend the SX Filterwheel, I have the 7 filters 36mm and it is a perfect match, I also have the SX OAG.

The nice thing about the SX flterwheel and OAG is that you can get 56mm of back focus with almost any camera, actually you have to add some short spacers to get 56mm, so you can use the camera with 'any' corrector/flattener. Once you start guiding with OAG there is no way to go back to guide scope.

You can glue a small powered USB hub to the camera and you'll be able to run the show with 'only' with 3 long cables, camera power, hub power and hub data.

There is a new SX FW-OAG combo, very low profile and is everything in one piece.

Cheers,

Jose

Attached Files



#11 tjugo

tjugo

    Viking 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 942
  • Joined: 06 Nov 2007

Posted 17 August 2013 - 05:57 PM

Pic 2

Attached Files



#12 tjugo

tjugo

    Viking 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 942
  • Joined: 06 Nov 2007

Posted 17 August 2013 - 06:01 PM

This is a native resolution crop of the center an corners of a 1 hour RAW sub. The camera is properly spaced to match the 56mm of the corrector.

1h subs are impossible to achieve with guide scope.

Do you know the total backfocus of the SBIG combo?

Cheers,

Jose

Attached Files



#13 Phil Hosey

Phil Hosey

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1626
  • Joined: 29 Oct 2008
  • Loc: LaGrange, GA

Posted 17 August 2013 - 07:00 PM

Wow Jose, thanks for the info. I think I will be going for the SX filter wheel and probably 36mm filters, although I'm tempted to use 2" mounted filters but then I would only be able to use a 5 pos wheel, so 36mm seems the best bet.

#14 Madratter

Madratter

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • *****
  • Posts: 6097
  • Joined: 14 Jan 2013

Posted 17 August 2013 - 07:36 PM

I use the FW8-8300 filter wheel from SBIG. As for size of filters, the 36mm filters are required for fast systems. For slower systems 1 1/4" can be used. However, then you'll need to buy spacers if you are using the SBIG filter wheel.

https://www.sbig.com...t-36mm-to-1.25/

#15 Phil Hosey

Phil Hosey

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1626
  • Joined: 29 Oct 2008
  • Loc: LaGrange, GA

Posted 18 August 2013 - 10:53 AM

Ok, I've been thinking about this a bit more and I'm wondering if I even need an electronic FW. Since I'm likely going to have to re-focus between filters anyway (even with parfocal filters because I'm using refractive optics) wouldn't it be a waste of money? The only way I could see it making sense is if I were also auto-focusing. Am I missing anything? (Other than I can't seem to find a manual FW that has 7 positions..)

#16 Dr Benway

Dr Benway

    Viking 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 656
  • Joined: 27 Mar 2008
  • Loc: Abilene, TX

Posted 18 August 2013 - 11:04 AM

I think you would do well with the SX FW. I bought mine on AstroMart with considerable savings over MSRP. Mine came with a 1.25" carousel, but I replaced it with a 5 slot 2", and now am filling up a 7 slot 36mm as I can afford it.

John

#17 buckeyestargazer

buckeyestargazer

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1891
  • Joined: 12 Jan 2008
  • Loc: IN, USA

Posted 18 August 2013 - 12:31 PM

Ok, I've been thinking about this a bit more and I'm wondering if I even need an electronic FW. Since I'm likely going to have to re-focus between filters anyway (even with parfocal filters because I'm using refractive optics) wouldn't it be a waste of money? The only way I could see it making sense is if I were also auto-focusing. Am I missing anything? (Other than I can't seem to find a manual FW that has 7 positions..)


Unless you are on a really tight budget (which I understand!) don't go with a manual filter wheel. I think you'll regret it. I had problems with light leaking around the thumb carousel and in general it was just a pain for serious imaging.

#18 Phil Hosey

Phil Hosey

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1626
  • Joined: 29 Oct 2008
  • Loc: LaGrange, GA

Posted 18 August 2013 - 06:27 PM

Ok, I've been thinking about this a bit more and I'm wondering if I even need an electronic FW. Since I'm likely going to have to re-focus between filters anyway (even with parfocal filters because I'm using refractive optics) wouldn't it be a waste of money? The only way I could see it making sense is if I were also auto-focusing. Am I missing anything? (Other than I can't seem to find a manual FW that has 7 positions..)


Unless you are on a really tight budget (which I understand!) don't go with a manual filter wheel. I think you'll regret it. I had problems with light leaking around the thumb carousel and in general it was just a pain for serious imaging.


Well, I decided to stick with the SXVR-H9 for now instead of switching to an 8300 chip, but I did order a SX 7 position USB filterwheel along with a set of Astrodon Tru-Balance Gen II E-series LRGB filters, which about wiped me out. :lol:

#19 tjugo

tjugo

    Viking 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 942
  • Joined: 06 Nov 2007

Posted 18 August 2013 - 09:51 PM

Good choice! The SX wheel works with many cameras, regardless of the CCD size (you can use 1.25", 36mm and 2" filters). I have used my wheel with these cameras:

-- Atik 460EX
-- SX H18
-- QHY9M
-- STF 8300
-- Orion DSI pro 3

With every camera I managed to achieve 56mm of backfocus including the OAG.

Later if you get another camera you don't need to worry about the filter wheel.

Cheers,

Jose

#20 elbee

elbee

    Viking 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 689
  • Joined: 02 May 2009
  • Loc: Arizona

Posted 19 August 2013 - 12:53 PM

jose -- nice setup with the STF-8300 and SX filter wheel/OAG. do you use a rotator or do manual rotation at the beginning of your session to get the guide camera on a guide star? (what about after meridian flip)

thanks

#21 tjugo

tjugo

    Viking 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 942
  • Joined: 06 Nov 2007

Posted 19 August 2013 - 03:49 PM

jose -- nice setup with the STF-8300 and SX filter wheel/OAG. do you use a rotator or do manual rotation at the beginning of your session to get the guide camera on a guide star? (what about after meridian flip)

thanks


Hi,

I manually rotate the camera, but I do it to proper frame my objects. I have 2 guide cameras a lodestar and a QHY5II-L, they are very sensitive, I have never be in the situation were there is no suitable guide star in the field of view with 1s exposures. After the flip, PHD will automatically pick a new star.

The QHY5II-1 is interchangeable with the lodestar, same backfocus, same threads, same barrel size, the lodestar has a slightly bigger CCD, but it looks without any hard proof that both cameras have the same sensitivity.

Cheers,

Jose

#22 Gregk

Gregk

    Vanguard

  • *****
  • Posts: 2420
  • Joined: 19 Nov 2006
  • Loc: San Tan Valley, Az,

Posted 19 August 2013 - 07:26 PM



Try this Movie

#23 alistairsam

alistairsam

    Lift Off

  • -----
  • Posts: 6
  • Joined: 03 Oct 2010
  • Loc: Melbourne, Australia

Posted 18 September 2013 - 10:40 PM

Hi,

I have a STF8300, nice camera, the only weak link is the cooling, it 'only' cools down to -36C from ambient. I highly recommend the SX Filterwheel, I have the 7 filters 36mm and it is a perfect match, I also have the SX OAG.

The nice thing about the SX flterwheel and OAG is that you can get 56mm of back focus with almost any camera, actually you have to add some short spacers to get 56mm, so you can use the camera with 'any' corrector/flattener. Once you start guiding with OAG there is no way to go back to guide scope.

You can glue a small powered USB hub to the camera and you'll be able to run the show with 'only' with 3 long cables, camera power, hub power and hub data.

There is a new SX FW-OAG combo, very low profile and is everything in one piece.

Cheers,

Jose


Hi,

I'm getting the exact same setup, STF8300M, SX USB Filterwheel, but using the TS9-OAG and a lodestar.
can you tell me if the SX filter wheel fits onto the SBIG STF directly without any spacers or adaptors?
does the body not hit the two thumb screws on the filter wheel as in that youtube video where he had to change sides?
I'll be using a baader mpcc, so my distance would be
stf8300m - 17.5mm
SX wheel - 29mm
TS9OAG - 9mmm

total 55.5mm which should work with the mpcc.
I'm using it on a 10inch F4.

how heavy is the camera/ filterwheel with filters?

Thanks
Alistair

#24 tjugo

tjugo

    Viking 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 942
  • Joined: 06 Nov 2007

Posted 19 September 2013 - 02:05 PM

Hi,

I have a STF8300, nice camera, the only weak link is the cooling, it 'only' cools down to -36C from ambient. I highly recommend the SX Filterwheel, I have the 7 filters 36mm and it is a perfect match, I also have the SX OAG.

The nice thing about the SX flterwheel and OAG is that you can get 56mm of back focus with almost any camera, actually you have to add some short spacers to get 56mm, so you can use the camera with 'any' corrector/flattener. Once you start guiding with OAG there is no way to go back to guide scope.

You can glue a small powered USB hub to the camera and you'll be able to run the show with 'only' with 3 long cables, camera power, hub power and hub data.

There is a new SX FW-OAG combo, very low profile and is everything in one piece.

Cheers,

Jose


Hi,

I'm getting the exact same setup, STF8300M, SX USB Filterwheel, but using the TS9-OAG and a lodestar.
can you tell me if the SX filter wheel fits onto the SBIG STF directly without any spacers or adaptors?
does the body not hit the two thumb screws on the filter wheel as in that youtube video where he had to change sides?
I'll be using a baader mpcc, so my distance would be
stf8300m - 17.5mm
SX wheel - 29mm
TS9OAG - 9mmm

total 55.5mm which should work with the mpcc.
I'm using it on a 10inch F4.

how heavy is the camera/ filterwheel with filters?

Thanks
Alistair



No spacers are needed to attach the camera, it works out of the box. I added some spacers in from the OAG to achieve the 58mm of backfocus needed for my setup. I have tested this setup with a lodestar and it works OK.

I don't know how heavy is the Camera+FW+Filters+OAG. 1kg?

Cheers,

Jose






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics