30K Encoders - How Much Improvement?
Posted 08 October 2013 - 10:26 AM
It would seem that such a jump would be a major time saver for centering small targets, especially small targets in rich fields. Milky Way planetary nebula and doubles come immediately to mind, although faint galaxies hunting would probably be a good application too.
Are there any mount owners (any type) using 30K encoders, and does the increase in resolution make a difference for you?
Posted 08 October 2013 - 01:03 PM
Posted 08 October 2013 - 02:14 PM
Posted 08 October 2013 - 07:53 PM
Now 4' to 5' pointing is pretty good.. going to 30k encoders would reduce that by maybe a factor of 2 at best. not sure if it would be worth it considering that most dobs aren't that rigid or orthogonal anyway...
Posted 09 October 2013 - 12:22 AM
Is this for visual observing?
Yes. Currently with Argo Navis (on a ServoCAT dob) I can land a target within the inner half of a field having a diameter of 21 arc minutes 100% of the time in early trials.
While that is good enough for large/bright Messier targets, for the small and/or faint targets in rich fields that still involves referencing the field to a star atlas to get a positive ident. (And perhaps that is my answer right there.)
My thinking on this was that increases in mount accuracy would be a real time-saver in terms of getting on-target, resulting is more objects seen per night. But I was not sure how common the 30K encoders are, so I was wondering if anyone is using them on other mounts and what the results have been.
But perhaps they are too new and there is no experience base with them yet.
Posted 09 October 2013 - 12:51 AM
Posted 09 October 2013 - 12:52 AM
Posted 11 October 2013 - 12:38 AM
Posted 12 October 2013 - 04:48 PM
The higher the encoder resolution, the higher the frequency of digital state changes in the optical sensor and in the logic that interprets those changes as scope movement. For various reasons the sensor and logic will have a limit to how high that frequency can be before state changes are missed. If that limit should be too low, you would be forced to slew the scope very slowly in order not to miss pulses and lose control of current position. Reasons for a frequency limit may include filtering to avoid electrical noise from being interpreted as scope movement, and if the pulses are sensed by a microprocessor, that processor may be polling an input only so often and relying on the fact that not more than one state change take place between polls. I have not experienced this problem myself with my 4k encoders, but since 10k has been the upper limit for years, I would be wary of assuming that I could just change to 30k and be able to move the scope as quickly as before.
Interesting. Gary Myers at StellarCAT is trying to put together a group purchase, I'll have to ask him about the frequency sensitivity.
Posted 12 October 2013 - 05:24 PM
Erik is right, there is a limit on how fast you can move before the pulses get missed. I put a set of 50k's on my G11 with a Sky Commander 4. I found that I had to push very slowly or the SC couldn't keep up. I've since moved over to Gemini-1 & had had to slow the slew rate down to 400 from 600 to get a consistent slew. I also have a Gemini-2 on my HGM-200, but currently encoders aren't supported yet. They are supposed to be in the next revision release.
Clear Dark Skies
Posted 13 October 2013 - 03:32 AM
Incorporating a 3:1 gear might give a similar effect?