Jump to content


Photo

OAG with Slr

  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 Mr Greybush

Mr Greybush

    Viking 1

  • *****
  • Moderators
  • Posts: 900
  • Joined: 16 May 2013
  • Loc: Virginia

Posted 10 October 2013 - 01:04 AM

Has anyone ever had success with an AOG using an SLR. I know I've read every article that has said no but does it really work. I'm curious and not to say I would spend any money on it but if you don't ask you don't know right

#2 guyroch

guyroch

    Vendor (BackyardEOS)

  • *****
  • Vendors
  • Posts: 2934
  • Joined: 22 Jan 2008
  • Loc: Under the clouds!

Posted 10 October 2013 - 07:25 AM

It works wonders, not sure what articles you read that said otherwise.

With a DSLR you need to make sure you maintain the right distance if you are also using a focal reducer and the added length of a OAG can mess up that distance in a hart beat.

The key is to get a thin OAG; there are a few available. The best thin and somewhat affordable OAG I have seen (and purchased) is the Lacerta OAG... but it's only available from Teleskop Services in Germany.

http://www.teleskop-...acerta-Off-A...

Hope this helps,

Guylain

#3 Footbag

Footbag

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • *****
  • Posts: 5841
  • Joined: 13 Apr 2009
  • Loc: Scranton, PA

Posted 10 October 2013 - 08:16 AM

Not only does it work, but it works much better then a piggybacked guidescope. It gives tighter, rounder stars and flexure becomes a non-issue.

The key is to get a good OAG as Guylain suggested and also a very sensitive guide camera. The Lodestar is a good one.

A good OAG setup with the camera will be $700+. IF you skimp, you may have a useless piece of hardware. I think that is why a lot of people try and are disappointed with OAG's. I tried three before settling on the TS OAG9EOS.

#4 Mr Greybush

Mr Greybush

    Viking 1

  • *****
  • Moderators
  • Posts: 900
  • Joined: 16 May 2013
  • Loc: Virginia

Posted 10 October 2013 - 11:25 AM

The cameras I have are an ASI120 and a Meade dsi. I think the ASI will be sensitive enough? I can't afford a loadstar

#5 guyroch

guyroch

    Vendor (BackyardEOS)

  • *****
  • Vendors
  • Posts: 2934
  • Joined: 22 Jan 2008
  • Loc: Under the clouds!

Posted 10 October 2013 - 12:06 PM

The cameras I have are an ASI120 and a Meade dsi. I think the ASI will be sensitive enough? I can't afford a loadstar


The ASI120 mono should be good enough... but as the SSAG it's a bit bulky and it may be difficult to use with a DSLR and OAG. The big body of a DSLR may obstruct the ideal position of the guide cam as needed. For this reason the Lodestar, ST-i, or QHY5L-II are better suited for OAG / DSLR combo.

Hope this helps,

Guylain

#6 Mr Greybush

Mr Greybush

    Viking 1

  • *****
  • Moderators
  • Posts: 900
  • Joined: 16 May 2013
  • Loc: Virginia

Posted 10 October 2013 - 12:10 PM

True looks like I'm up to saving some money. Thanks guys :)

#7 petemumbower

petemumbower

    Surveyor 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 1680
  • Joined: 12 Jul 2009
  • Loc: West Michigan

Posted 10 October 2013 - 01:53 PM

It sure does work. I just got the Orion thin OAG(TAOG) and a QHY5L-II. After getting the focus set, it guided great and my stars were pretty much round and consistent from frame to frame! Well worth the money(I spent around $470 for this combo) and learning curve.

#8 SuperBlueNova

SuperBlueNova

    Sputnik

  • -----
  • Posts: 34
  • Joined: 29 Sep 2013
  • Loc: Madison, WI

Posted 10 October 2013 - 03:59 PM

Would the OAG interfere with a full frame sensor?






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics