Jump to content


Photo

First image w/SV105-3FT

  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 epdreher

epdreher

    Ranger 4

  • -----
  • Posts: 358
  • Joined: 12 Jun 2011
  • Loc: Republic of Texas

Posted 02 November 2013 - 10:45 AM

This is my first post to this forum after having gleaned what I could from the experience here. Much appreciated.

I've spent the past several weeks trying to learn what I could using "dry runs" during the day, including hardware and software set-ups. Last night, I put it all to use for the first time on the Double Cluster.

I've attached a URL for five, three-minute RAWs, cropped and pre-processed via Nebulosity. Considering the learning curve, I'm pleased with my first attempt but it isn't without problems, probably my fault for not double-checking everything.

The URL for the PHD graph looks good to me, but I'd appreciate confirmation of this and any suggestions. The star images are a bit oblong, but I found after the exposure that my CGEM head was not tightened properly after drift alignment and the FF may have been loose in the Feathertouch. I'm thinking that either or both of these induced mechanical flex.

Thanks to all for any and all answers and input.

http://img194.images...4/3277/wgws.jpg
http://img5.imagesha...5/6274/iw7m.jpg

Equipment:
SV 105-3FT w/SV FF
Canon T3 modified by Hap Griffin
Celestron CGEM
50mm SharpStar guide scope w/Lodestar camera
PHD/BackyardEOS

#2 skycamper

skycamper

    Viking 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 541
  • Joined: 20 Oct 2007
  • Loc: Beaverton OR

Posted 03 November 2013 - 02:17 AM

I have the same scope without the FT focus or the FF. This is a great place to get started, so many people here also helped me. That's a great shot!

Keep it up!
Abraham

#3 Wouter D'hoye

Wouter D'hoye

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1519
  • Joined: 27 Jun 2003
  • Loc: Belgium

Posted 03 November 2013 - 04:08 AM

Nice image. personally I would brighten the background a tad to make sure it's not too dark and definately not black. You may also want to play a bit with the saturation of the colors to give some boost to the satar colors.

Good start!

Wouter.

#4 epdreher

epdreher

    Ranger 4

  • -----
  • Posts: 358
  • Joined: 12 Jun 2011
  • Loc: Republic of Texas

Posted 03 November 2013 - 11:51 AM

Thanks, Wouter. Digital is the inverse of my old hypered Fuji 400 days. Now more time is spent processing. ;)

I tweaked it a bit, and it does look better. Thanks for the suggestion.

Posted Image

#5 Madratter

Madratter

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • *****
  • Posts: 6815
  • Joined: 14 Jan 2013

Posted 03 November 2013 - 11:56 AM

Looks good! :)

#6 epdreher

epdreher

    Ranger 4

  • -----
  • Posts: 358
  • Joined: 12 Jun 2011
  • Loc: Republic of Texas

Posted 03 November 2013 - 12:03 PM

Looks good! :)


Thank you. BTW, I've bookmarked your Pixinsight tutorial. I haven't touched my copy yet, so needed a "basic" to get started. I appreciate your efforts. :)

#7 CounterWeight

CounterWeight

    Cosmos

  • *****
  • Posts: 8202
  • Joined: 05 Oct 2008
  • Loc: Palo alto, CA.

Posted 03 November 2013 - 01:08 PM

You are off to a great start, congrat's!






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics