Jump to content


Photo

Mechanism for LENR possibly identified

  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 deSitter

deSitter

    Still in Old School

  • -----
  • Posts: 6879
  • Joined: 09 Dec 2004

Posted 03 November 2013 - 11:55 PM

This seems entirely plausible. (Note: for "supper current" read "super current".)

http://www.physics.p...NS-KH-Pre-1.pdf

Note that this paper references an actual experiment.

-drl

#2 llanitedave

llanitedave

    Humble Megalomaniac

  • *****
  • Posts: 22670
  • Joined: 25 Sep 2005
  • Loc: Amargosa Valley, NV, USA

Posted 04 November 2013 - 10:25 AM

That's what we've needed from the beginning, is to put this on some real theoretical foundation. Now, at least we can have work done in this direction that's actually progressive and self-correcting, without the flim-flam.

#3 Kon Dealer

Kon Dealer

    Viking 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 733
  • Joined: 05 Jan 2011
  • Loc: Cambridge UK

Posted 06 November 2013 - 05:35 PM

Section 7.4 "Supper current"
Can't they proof read properly?

#4 llanitedave

llanitedave

    Humble Megalomaniac

  • *****
  • Posts: 22670
  • Joined: 25 Sep 2005
  • Loc: Amargosa Valley, NV, USA

Posted 06 November 2013 - 08:22 PM

They probably wrote it when they were hungry.

#5 Ira

Ira

    Mercury-Atlas

  • *****
  • Posts: 2655
  • Joined: 22 Aug 2010
  • Loc: Mitzpe Ramon, Israel

Posted 07 November 2013 - 01:53 PM

Is this good news or bad news?

/Ira

#6 PeterR280

PeterR280

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1186
  • Joined: 27 May 2013

Posted 07 November 2013 - 02:35 PM

Maybe they were eating dinner when they wrote the paper/






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics