USB frame grabbers: Is there a better solution?
Posted 24 January 2014 - 12:16 PM
Why is the image quality straight from the camera to a dedicated monitor, so much better than the image produced by the grabber sent to my laptop?
I like using Miloslick software to enhance the image, but it cannot do much of it on the raw, direct from camera signal.
What is it with these USB grabbers that so degrade the image?
Is there a hardware solution that will give better image quality with full, software image enhancement functionality?
Posted 24 January 2014 - 01:08 PM
But the frame grabber samples just one frame, and it adds noise of its own (both random and quantization noise) on top of the noise that's already there.
Really good on-the-fly post processing could accomplish the same thing, but the state-of-art isn't so good that substantial additional delay is incurred, and significant extra skill is required.
Although it may be possible to build a "perfect" frame grabber (at substantial additional expense), that can't help the fact that only one frame is converted at a time: post-processing is required for a complete solution.
Although software is getting better at on-the-fly post processing, it still can't match what the combination of a monitor and your eye/brain can accomplish.
Of course more sophisticated post processing is capable of achieving much more than any videocam/monitor/eye can do (taking substantial time, requiring great skill, and adding stress and frustration), but that's "imaging", which does not fall under the scope or intention of this forum.
I like it that way: although I also image when I have the time and patience, instant gratification is the greatest! Anything more than 10 seconds is torture, and 1 second is great!!!
Posted 24 January 2014 - 04:19 PM
I can't thank you enough for your thorough explanation.
As a relative newcomer to Video Assisted Observing, I have a lot to learn. As far as "instant gratification" (of Video)goes, I'm with you all the way! I haven't opened my eyepiece case since I went to Video.
Posted 25 January 2014 - 12:04 AM
Posted 25 January 2014 - 02:36 PM
For a quick look I accept the limitations of a quick single-frame grab, but I'm currently researching options for on-the-fly processing that automatically averages and/or stacks multiple frames in real time for the virtual "live view" that I seek.
Posted 25 January 2014 - 09:18 PM
You can do what you're trying to do with a frame grabber over VNC. You're not losing anything and VNC doesn't require a crazy capable internet connection.