Jump to content


Photo

Sh2-136

  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

#1 andysea

andysea

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1492
  • Joined: 03 Sep 2010
  • Loc: Seattle, WA

Posted 01 August 2014 - 12:17 PM

Here is my latest image. I probably need a lot more integration time but it's a start.
https://www.flickr.c...2410122/sizes/l
I used the 6"RC again.

Attached Files


  • Cristina Cellini likes this

#2 David Pavlich

David Pavlich

    Transmographied

  • *****
  • Administrators
  • Posts: 27509
  • Joined: 18 May 2005
  • Loc: Mandeville, LA USA

Posted 01 August 2014 - 01:51 PM

Very nice, Andy!!

David

#3 blueman

blueman

    Photon Catcher

  • *****
  • Posts: 5372
  • Joined: 20 Jul 2007
  • Loc: California

Posted 01 August 2014 - 08:22 PM

Neat object, indeed a good start.
Blueman

#4 David Rosenthal

David Rosenthal

    Imager Extraordinaire

  • *****
  • Posts: 3114
  • Joined: 23 Jun 2006
  • Loc: NJ

Posted 02 August 2014 - 07:43 AM

There is some great detail in there already! Nice!

#5 Jim Thommes

Jim Thommes

    Soyuz

  • ****-
  • Posts: 3819
  • Joined: 20 Sep 2004
  • Loc: San DiegoCA USA

Posted 03 August 2014 - 11:23 PM

Andy,

Looks really nice. I like the rotated orientation - the "ghosties" look upright.



#6 Leonardo70

Leonardo70

    Apollo

  • -----
  • Posts: 1193
  • Joined: 16 Apr 2009
  • Loc: Turin - Italy

Posted 05 August 2014 - 10:52 AM

Nice Andy ... i think some deconvolution help to gain better sharp result.

 

All the best,

Leo



#7 andysea

andysea

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1492
  • Joined: 03 Sep 2010
  • Loc: Seattle, WA

Posted 05 August 2014 - 03:45 PM

Thanks Leo.

I am actually planning to reprocess it altogether. The seeing was bad so, yes deconvolution is in order to sharpen it.



#8 Cristina Cellini

Cristina Cellini

    Messenger

  • -----
  • Posts: 488
  • Joined: 11 Aug 2012
  • Loc: Ravenna, Italy

Posted 06 August 2014 - 04:04 AM

Nice image!

 

Cristina



#9 pfile

pfile

    Gemini

  • -----
  • Posts: 3164
  • Joined: 14 Jun 2009

Posted 06 August 2014 - 03:40 PM

nice - what's the bortle rating for your imaging location?

 

rob



#10 petemumbower

petemumbower

    Surveyor 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 1680
  • Joined: 12 Jul 2009
  • Loc: West Michigan

Posted 06 August 2014 - 08:03 PM

Great start to this! That 6"rc is a gem. Time to talk to the CFO about getting one.



#11 rainycityastro

rainycityastro

    Viking 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 721
  • Joined: 29 Mar 2010
  • Loc: Seattle, WA

Posted 06 August 2014 - 11:47 PM

nice - what's the bortle rating for your imaging location?

 

rob

Since I image at the same location as Andy, I'd say it is a Bortle class 3 site. 



#12 andysea

andysea

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1492
  • Joined: 03 Sep 2010
  • Loc: Seattle, WA

Posted 07 August 2014 - 10:11 AM

Yep it seems to be class 3.








Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics