Jump to content


Photo

Takahashi FSQ-85mm ED Anyone?

  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

#1 AFScienceTime

AFScienceTime

    Vostok 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 130
  • Joined: 15 Jun 2014

Posted 17 August 2014 - 03:15 AM

I decided that when I start astrophotography, I will start with a 80-90 mm refractor. So, I found the Takahashi FSQ-85 ED, and thought that this will be an excellent and portable telescope. The problem is, I can't find any good reviews. Does anybody own this telescope? Can you provide some information on it then? And some sample images perhaps?



#2 LewisM

LewisM

    Ranger 4

  • -----
  • Posts: 307
  • Joined: 23 Jan 2013
  • Loc: Australia

Posted 17 August 2014 - 04:00 AM

One word - SUPERB.

 

Cn you read German? Or at least use Google translate: http://astro-foren.d...39150#post39150

 

Basically, the FSQ85 has a sample Strehl of 0.975 (1 is perfect), so it is VERY sharp.

 

I own an FSQ85 - I won't be replacing it any time soon. I much prefer it to the Big Brother FSQ106



#3 tomcody

tomcody

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1798
  • Joined: 06 Jul 2008
  • Loc: Titusville, Florida

Posted 17 August 2014 - 07:33 AM

There's a good owners review of the FSQ 85 and 106ED by Chris Thomasel on Astromart's review section.

Rex



#4 jzeiders

jzeiders

    Viking 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 521
  • Joined: 07 Nov 2012
  • Loc: SF Bay Area

Posted 17 August 2014 - 02:59 PM

Do a search on astrobin's big wall for FSQ 85 and look at the work posted there.

 

You can also find some articles by searching google.

 

I have the "Q" 106 and ting it is great. The baby Q or 85 mm is just as good and only 8 pounds opposed to the 15+ of the 106. Your 85 should be about perfect or photography and works week visually should you wish. It is built like a tank and will hold about any camera.

 

Jack



#5 AFScienceTime

AFScienceTime

    Vostok 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 130
  • Joined: 15 Jun 2014

Posted 18 August 2014 - 06:50 AM

One word - SUPERB.

 

Cn you read German? Or at least use Google translate: http://astro-foren.d...39150#post39150

 

Basically, the FSQ85 has a sample Strehl of 0.975 (1 is perfect), so it is VERY sharp.

 

I own an FSQ85 - I won't be replacing it any time soon. I much prefer it to the Big Brother FSQ106

 

Thank you! I know some German, so that review was really helpful.



#6 AFScienceTime

AFScienceTime

    Vostok 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 130
  • Joined: 15 Jun 2014

Posted 18 August 2014 - 06:50 AM

One word - SUPERB.

 

Cn you read German? Or at least use Google translate: http://astro-foren.d...39150#post39150

 

Basically, the FSQ85 has a sample Strehl of 0.975 (1 is perfect), so it is VERY sharp.

 

I own an FSQ85 - I won't be replacing it any time soon. I much prefer it to the Big Brother FSQ106

 

Thanks! I will check it out!



#7 AFScienceTime

AFScienceTime

    Vostok 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 130
  • Joined: 15 Jun 2014

Posted 18 August 2014 - 06:54 AM

Do a search on astrobin's big wall for FSQ 85 and look at the work posted there.

 

You can also find some articles by searching google.

 

I have the "Q" 106 and ting it is great. The baby Q or 85 mm is just as good and only 8 pounds opposed to the 15+ of the 106. Your 85 should be about perfect or photography and works week visually should you wish. It is built like a tank and will hold about any camera.

 

Jack

 

OK! Although the aperture is quite small, I guess it will do for some open cluster and brighter object observing. How would it compare to a 130mm Newtonian (my current grab and go scope) for visual? I mean, the aperture is almost the half, but the optics are much more superb.



#8 BillP

BillP

    Voyager 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 12035
  • Joined: 26 Nov 2006
  • Loc: Vienna, VA

Posted 18 August 2014 - 01:13 PM

I guess it will do for some open cluster and brighter object observing.

 

 

It's really meant for imaging...

 

http://www.buytelesc..._refractor.jpeg

 

http://ollypenrice.s...POSITE FL-M.jpg

 

http://pics.sternguc...g-906372.mx.jpg

 

http://sirius-cma.im...809_2600794.jpg

 

http://www.nightpixe...40_ha3_full.jpg

 

http://www.astronomy...Ha_25012012.jpg

 

http://www.jbassoe.d..._mac4_66pct.jpg



#9 LewisM

LewisM

    Ranger 4

  • -----
  • Posts: 307
  • Joined: 23 Jan 2013
  • Loc: Australia

Posted 19 August 2014 - 05:09 AM

It is, but it is still one of my favourite visual scopes. VERY bright, sharp, and flat.

 

Just a delightful scope in every sense.



#10 thesubwaypusher

thesubwaypusher

    Viking 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 970
  • Joined: 08 Jul 2004
  • Loc: New York City

Posted 31 August 2014 - 11:04 PM

It is, but it is still one of my favourite visual scopes. VERY bright, sharp, and flat.

 

Just a delightful scope in every sense.

 

Yes!

 

And you don't have to observe with it. Just sit and hold it and love it to death. My favorite Tak scope, for sure.








Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics