Jump to content

  •  

CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.

Photo

Does High Humidity (97%) Increase Vignetting

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
11 replies to this topic

#1 RandallK

RandallK

    Gemini

  • -----
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 3,031
  • Joined: 10 Nov 2006

Posted 02 October 2014 - 01:12 PM

I thought I just mastered taking my first flats about 3 weeks ago, and in fact my flats did remove the vignetting from my image frames taken with the ATIK 383L (Kodak 8300 chip with 1.25" filters). I stretched the newly processed light frames after applying flats and I couldn't stretch to reveal any vignetting on all four corners like I did without taking flats so I deemed that to be a success. But a few nights ago, the skies were "clear" but the relative humidity was 97%. After a 4 hour session of imaging the Cave Nebula I brought my scope in to the basement and took all the flats and applied them. The next morning I started to process them in Nebulosity3 as I always do and my processed subframes still had vignetting despite applying flats and they almost looked like the original lights before applying the flats. The only thing different between the session 3 weeks ago and the one a few days ago was heavy dew. I was using my 80mm apo with dew shield so I didn't bother to check the lens for any moisture. I'll have to make sure to check next time we have a heavy dew.

 

So my question is, "Can a very high humidity (it was 97% according to my outdoor weather station sensor) increase the effect of vignetting, as opposed to a dry night?"  Any answers greatly appreciated.



#2 Ron (Lubbock)

Ron (Lubbock)

    Surveyor 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 1,604
  • Joined: 17 Aug 2012

Posted 02 October 2014 - 04:32 PM

You might have frosted over your chip and didn't notice it while imaging.  Hope that is not the case.  The sensor sometimes frosts over from the corners inward if there is water vapor inside the camera.  If so, better change the dessicant pronto.  Frost can permanently damage the microlens array in certain chips.  In addition, the dessicant takes 3 days or more to work in the 383L+, from personal experience.



#3 Lenbo

Lenbo

    Viking 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 674
  • Joined: 08 Apr 2009

Posted 03 October 2014 - 08:07 AM

Never saw that effect with dew. I have had the frosting effect but it is usually pretty apparent at startup. I have extra desiccant tabs and bake them on low heat for awhile. I cycle out every few days if necessary till it clears up. Len

#4 RandallK

RandallK

    Gemini

  • -----
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 3,031
  • Joined: 10 Nov 2006

Posted 03 October 2014 - 11:35 AM

Never saw that effect with dew. I have had the frosting effect but it is usually pretty apparent at startup. I have extra desiccant tabs and bake them on low heat for awhile. I cycle out every few days if necessary till it clears up. Len

Hi Lenbo,

Yeah, I've seen the frost on the edge before. I just give the camera a bit more time to cool down, then it disappears. The frost only seems to occur on the first 3 frames or so, then it disappears so I go for an extra 3 frames at the beginning of imaging. But failing to reduce the vignetting has got me stumped. I will give it another go when we get clear skies again and a lower humidy. I'm sure that must be the culprit as everything was the same as before when my flats did a perfect job of eliminating the 4 corner vignetting. This is not related to the frosting issue, I'm positive.


Edited by RandallK, 03 October 2014 - 11:36 AM.


#5 Madratter

Madratter

    Hubble

  • *****
  • Posts: 13,277
  • Joined: 14 Jan 2013

Posted 03 October 2014 - 11:59 AM

It certainly can if there is light dew on the mirrors/lenses you might not have noticed.


Edited by Madratter, 03 October 2014 - 12:00 PM.


#6 Mitchell Duke

Mitchell Duke

    Skylab

  • *****
  • Posts: 4,165
  • Joined: 22 Apr 2008

Posted 03 October 2014 - 01:01 PM

Can you post a picture of the image affected?

#7 RandallK

RandallK

    Gemini

  • -----
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 3,031
  • Joined: 10 Nov 2006

Posted 03 October 2014 - 05:57 PM

Can you post a picture of the image affected?

Hi Mitchell,

 

Here are 3 frames of the Cave Nebula. One of the original Red Light frames, one of the original Red Flat frames, and one of the original Processed Red frames after flat frame application. They almost look the same. I did the processing in Nebulosity3 and then a gave it a go in Deep Sky Stacker and got the same final result. Randall

 

Cave Nebula_300sec_1x1_R_frame6.jpg Flats_ATIK 383L,80mmAPO_.80 Reducer_9.86sec_1x1_RF_frame6.jpg pproc_Cave Nebula_300sec_1x1_R_frame6.jpg


Edited by RandallK, 03 October 2014 - 05:58 PM.


#8 Mitchell Duke

Mitchell Duke

    Skylab

  • *****
  • Posts: 4,165
  • Joined: 22 Apr 2008

Posted 04 October 2014 - 05:25 PM

It looks circular, could it be the sensor catching the OTA walls?

#9 RandallK

RandallK

    Gemini

  • -----
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 3,031
  • Joined: 10 Nov 2006

Posted 05 October 2014 - 12:14 AM

Funny, it worked like a hot **** on my previous image...same set-up but much lower humdity. Guess I'll have to wait for the next clear sky and get more results.

 

In the mean time, here is a cropped "final" of that vignetted Cave (Sh2-155) Nebula.

 

Cave Nebula_Ha, RGB_3_Cropped 135%_200 dpi CN.jpg Thanks for all your input.



#10 TxStars

TxStars

    Gemini

  • *****
  • Posts: 3,334
  • Joined: 01 Oct 2005

Posted 11 October 2014 - 11:00 PM

With the humidity that high moisture can form on the filters.



#11 RandallK

RandallK

    Gemini

  • -----
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 3,031
  • Joined: 10 Nov 2006

Posted 18 October 2014 - 09:04 PM

With the humidity that high moisture can form on the filters.


Thanks,
Thats another good point. My filter wheel is very much enclosed with no light getting in and maybe things began to sweat.
It was rather stupid of me to go out in 97% humidity. I shouldn't go above 60 to 65 I would think. Thanks again for your idea.

#12 TxStars

TxStars

    Gemini

  • *****
  • Posts: 3,334
  • Joined: 01 Oct 2005

Posted 19 October 2014 - 06:31 AM

I use a cut off point of 95% for my imaging equipment.

For visual dew heaters and hair dryers can get you by.




CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.


Recent Topics






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics