Forums Directory All Topics   Announcements and News General Astronomy Equipment Discussions Astrophotography and Sketching Observing Telescope Specific Forums Speciality Forums Other Swap and Shop CN Feedback and Vendor Announcements International Year of Astronomy 2009 - Forums are now closed. Search Articles and Columns Photos

# Check my math

Assuming a well constructed mount, what is the accuracy of a 4096 encoder in arc-minutes?

360 degrees x 60 arc-minutes/degree = 21600 arc-minutes

21600 arc-minutes / 4096 = 5.3

So each click of the encoder is 5.3 arc minutes.

Would that mean the accuracy is 5.3 or would it be some multiple of that, 10.6, 15.9?

Lane

The math seems reasonable. The 5.3 arc minutes would be your resolution, not the accuracy. The biggest source of error would be a bias which could be anything (e.g. 10°). After that there might be some periodic error which would hopefully be only plus or minus a few arc minutes.

Steve

CGEM, C8, C11, AT72ED, NexStar 5SE

Orion Starshoot Pro V2 Color NexImage 5 / ASI120MC Planetary imagers

My photos: http://astrobin.com/users/Steve/

Like (0 likes)
What do you mean by bias? 10 degrees would make the DSCs worthless.

This is on the T-Rex alt-az mount.

I was kind of thinking that as long as I use a high power eyepiece to pick my two alignment stars so I can get them centered properly then I should get targets to be within + or - 5.3 arc minutes of the center of an eyepiece.

The only possible problem I can think of is if the longitude axis and the latitude axis are not exactly 90 degrees apart.

Lane

Like (0 likes)
Your math is good only if your base assumption is correct. The assumption you made is that the encoder is mounted on the worm gear. If the encoder is mounted on the worm, then you will get a much higher resolution. Each rotation of the worm will have 1440 steps, giving you a much nigher resolution.

Phil

Like (0 likes)