Quote:Very nice result, was the declination compensation entered in pecprep?
Quote:Ok, some people miss that when using pecprep. Great result. One recommendation I would have is to shoot at a higher focal length, pempro recommends less than 2 arc/sec per pixel.
Quote:it's actually the first two numbers that are the peak-to-peak PE, which in this case is +/- 4" or so. Since auto-filter has already been clicked. The +/- 2" is RMS PE, that's not what we want. Try to un-click all the harmonics except the fundamental (the highest one, with 200-second period). so we can see the fundamental worm PE. Strange though that the extra terms are all slower than the fundamental. Normally the extra terms are caused by the gearbox and are faster than the fundamental..
Quote:No gear box in the eq8
Quote:ok so the worm fundamental is +4" / -4" which is good but not mind-boggling. Tak NJP's are usually under +2" / -2" (so are AP900s) but of course they cost a lot more.
Conclusion, it seems to have similar PE as the CGE Pro, with a similar price as the CGE Pro. But I think it carries more payload?
Quote:One recommendation I would have is to shoot at a higher focal length, pempro recommends less than 2 arc/sec per pixel.