Quote:The image is what matters, unless your goal is to frame a plot of the guide log and put it on the wall.
"Life is a journey, enjoy the ride" *********** Stellarvue 90 Raptor CF.Explore Scientific 152mm Comet Hunter.Orionx14g.Borg 125SD.Borg 60ED. Borg 50Achro. AT10RC. AT6RC. iOptron iEQ45GTN w/TDM.iOptron ZEQ25.iOptron Cube Pro.iOptron MT Pro/iOptron SmartEQ Pro.Celestron 10x50 Way too many EPs, flatteners and reducers. Nikon D5100, Canon T3i and a bunch of filters.
Quote:Quote:Correct me if I'm wrong, is this actually measured using Borg 250mm FL? Is graph compensated for FL of the main scope? I've asked on a few forums, and have been informed, the correct method is the focal length of the guidescope, not the imaging scope.Makes sense to me, since PHD is gathering the data through the imaging scope.Perhaps someone has some other information or can add some information?Best...Paul
Quote:Correct me if I'm wrong, is this actually measured using Borg 250mm FL? Is graph compensated for FL of the main scope?
http://www.astrobin.com/users/orion69/ TS 150 mm APO Triplet, Feather Touch 3.5" focuser, Micro Touch Focusing System CGEM on custom made platform Atik 383L+ mono, Atik filter wheel, Baader LRGBC + narrowband filters SX Lodestar + TSOAG9 Dew-Not heater
Developer of Hyper-Modded 450D and iAstroHub Astro-physics 155EDT, Takahashi FSQ85EDX Losmandy G11 Gemini, iOptron ZEQ25GT QHY8L, QHY6, QHY5L-ii-c