Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Eyepieces

Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)
ponz
super member


Reged: 07/18/12

Loc: Kansas City, MO
Help a Noob?
      #5623215 - 01/14/13 06:46 PM

Howdy.

I recently bought a Skywatcher Pro 80ED with an Atlas mount, etc.....to get into imaging.

However, I'd also like to utilize the scope for viewing. The scope came with a 5mm and 20mm eyepiece, 2" diag, step down, etc....

As a photographer I'm experiencing lens lust all over again!

I'd like a quality eyepiece for lunar and planetary viewing to make the scope a little more versatile. I've been eyeballing the Neglar 6-3mm as a one eyepiece fits all.

It's my understanding that 2" is better tha 1.25"? If so, I don't see any 2"ers in that focal length....

Your thoughts please?

Thanks,
Ponz

Edited by ponz (01/14/13 06:50 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
MikeBOKC
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 05/10/10

Loc: Oklahoma City, OK
Re: Help a Noob? new [Re: ponz]
      #5623344 - 01/14/13 08:21 PM

Two inch eyepieces are generally north of about 24mm. The gap in your lineup would be well filled by something in the 10-12mm range. The Explore Scientific 11mm 82 degree eyepiece is a sweet spot for many, well regarded and currently on sale if you can find one in stock. Or if you want to go a little richer take a look at the 10mm Delos from Televue.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Hermie
sage
*****

Reged: 04/20/05

Loc: Cloudy HKG
Re: Help a Noob? new [Re: ponz]
      #5623349 - 01/14/13 08:23 PM

Ponz,

Congratulations on your purchase! The Nagler 3-6 is a great eyepiece for a short refractor. I think that your scope is 900mm focal length and in that case the Nagler zoom is very high power. If you increase power too much, you will find the view becomes very dim and unsteady.

Short focal length (high magnification) eyepieces are all 1.25" because the light cone entering the eyepiece is small. As you go to longer focal length/lower power eyepieces the field of view has to be increased to 2" or become narrower. So 2" eyepieces become the norm as you increase past about 20mm.

I won't make any specific recommendations, but I think you should consider something around 7-8mm for a high power eyepiece, and around 20mm for medium power.

What do you think of the eyepieces that came with the scope? Are they comfortable to use? That will help others guide you on what you might like.

Hermie


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ibase
Vendor Affiliate
*****

Reged: 03/20/08

Loc: Manila, Philippines 121*E 14*N
Re: Help a Noob? new [Re: Hermie]
      #5623364 - 01/14/13 08:29 PM

Interested in astrophotography too? Then consider a Baader Hyperion 8-24mm zoom, it adapts to the camera quite well:


Baader Hyperion 8-24mm zoom mated to a Canon DSLR D1000

Afocal shots are also my favorite for Moon shots using the 8mm Hyperion zoom setting and a WO66mm petzval refractor, like below, biggest Supermoon in 18 years when it was taken.



Best,


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ponz
super member


Reged: 07/18/12

Loc: Kansas City, MO
Re: Help a Noob? new [Re: MikeBOKC]
      #5623418 - 01/14/13 08:56 PM

Quote:

Two inch eyepieces are generally north of about 24mm. The gap in your lineup would be well filled by something in the 10-12mm range. The Explore Scientific 11mm 82 degree eyepiece is a sweet spot for many, well regarded and currently on sale if you can find one in stock. Or if you want to go a little richer take a look at the 10mm Delos from Televue.




A "little" richer? Jeez - 370 bucks for the single focal length 10mm Delos! The Explore Scientific
11mm looks pretty good.

Wha are your thoughts on a barlow? Any need with my current puny lineup, even if spring for the zoom or not?

Thanks - Ponz


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ponz
super member


Reged: 07/18/12

Loc: Kansas City, MO
Re: Help a Noob? new [Re: ibase]
      #5623419 - 01/14/13 08:57 PM

Quote:

Interested in astrophotography too? Then consider a Baader Hyperion 8-24mm zoom, it adapts to the camera quite well:


Baader Hyperion 8-24mm zoom mated to a Canon DSLR D1000

Afocal shots are also my favorite for Moon shots using the 8mm Hyperion zoom setting and a WO66mm petzval refractor, like below, biggest Supermoon in 18 years when it was taken.



Best,




Nice shot!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ponz
super member


Reged: 07/18/12

Loc: Kansas City, MO
Re: Help a Noob? new [Re: Hermie]
      #5623423 - 01/14/13 09:01 PM

Quote:

Ponz,

Congratulations on your purchase! The Nagler 3-6 is a great eyepiece for a short refractor. I think that your scope is 900mm focal length and in that case the Nagler zoom is very high power. If you increase power too much, you will find the view becomes very dim and unsteady.

Short focal length (high magnification) eyepieces are all 1.25" because the light cone entering the eyepiece is small. As you go to longer focal length/lower power eyepieces the field of view has to be increased to 2" or become narrower. So 2" eyepieces become the norm as you increase past about 20mm.

I won't make any specific recommendations, but I think you should consider something around 7-8mm for a high power eyepiece, and around 20mm for medium power.

What do you think of the eyepieces that came with the scope? Are they comfortable to use? That will help others guide you on what you might like.

Hermie




Thanks Hermie - Well, I've got a 5 and 20 that came with the scope, but the jury is still out regarding their quality....


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Hermie
sage
*****

Reged: 04/20/05

Loc: Cloudy HKG
Re: Help a Noob? new [Re: ponz]
      #5623618 - 01/14/13 11:11 PM

Ponz,

The reason I asked is because I'm guessing that the eyepieces you have are "plossl" (design). They are probably OK quality, but the apparent field of view (AFOV - how wide the view appears through the eyepiece) is about 45 degrees and the eye relief (how far your eye should be from the eyepiece to view) will be good for the 20mm and very short for the 5mm. I was asking because you will need to decide how much field of view you want to buy, and how much eye relief you need.

For me, I'm happy with about 70 degrees AFOV but other people love wide 82 or 100 degree views. I need at least 15mm eye relief because I wear glasses for observing, but many people are happy with much less.

The Hyperion zoom that Hernando recommended is a great eyepiece and you may not need anything else.

Barlows can be handy. I have one, but rarely use it because I find it a hassle to connect into the system and then the barlowed eyepiece becomes very tall. That's just me, and other people happily barlow most nights.

Hermie


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jon Isaacs
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 06/16/04

Loc: San Diego and Boulevard, CA
Re: Help a Noob? new [Re: ponz]
      #5623881 - 01/15/13 06:58 AM

Quote:


Thanks Hermie - Well, I've got a 5 and 20 that came with the scope, but the jury is still out regarding their quality....




Optically, Plossls are good eyepieces, in your 80mm F/7.5, the 5mm is provides you with 120x, a nice place to be. The 50 degree field of view is adequate but more is generally nice. The biggest issue with short focal length Plossls is the eye relief, its only about 3mm-4mm in a 5mm so you have to get very close to the eyepiece. More eye relief makes for more comfort.

At some point you will probably want to observe the great variety of possible objects, not only the planets but also deep space objects, galaxies, nebulae, clusters. It's probably wise to have some sort of long term plan. The Nagler 3mm-6mm zoom is a great choice for viewing the planets with your scope, it provides you with 100x-200x.

At some point you will probably want a low power widefield eyepiece, the right eyepiece in a 2 inch diagonal would give you about 4 degrees TFoV... And of course some eyepieces to handle the middle ground between 20x and 200x...

In terms of cost, it all adds up. But a good set of eyepieces can be a lifetime investment, effective in any scope you might own.

Jon


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ponz
super member


Reged: 07/18/12

Loc: Kansas City, MO
Re: Help a Noob? new [Re: Jon Isaacs]
      #5624267 - 01/15/13 11:57 AM

OK - Before I pull tghe trigger on the Neglar 6-3mm, would someone please explain why the specs for my scope indicate a max magnification of 160? Would I be wasting 40x worth of power?

What determines max magnification? I know seeing conditions play a major role.

Thanks - Ponz

Edited by ponz (01/15/13 11:59 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
dpwoos
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 10/18/06

Loc: United States
Re: Help a Noob? new [Re: ponz]
      #5624366 - 01/15/13 01:04 PM

I don't own a Nagler 3-6 zoom, and here is why. A fellow club member once lent me his for a few weeks, and another member has lent me his several times, and though I agree that it is a very nice eyepiece, it isn't perfect. The fov is 50degrees, which is no better than a plossl. On one occasion I could see Enceladus in my 6" f/8 dob with a $25 6mm plossl and I could not see it with the Nagler zoom. So, I have continued looking at other possibilities for comfortable high-power views. I have recently been experimenting with a 13mm Type 6 Nagler and a TV 2x barlow, and I like the resulting performance a lot.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
dpwoos
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 10/18/06

Loc: United States
Re: Help a Noob? new [Re: dpwoos]
      #5625521 - 01/16/13 12:37 AM

Also, the 160x is 50x/inch, which is the accepted max productive magnification. I wouldn't worry about this very much.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ponz
super member


Reged: 07/18/12

Loc: Kansas City, MO
Re: Help a Noob? new [Re: ibase]
      #5625743 - 01/16/13 08:08 AM

Quote:

Interested in astrophotography too? Then consider a Baader Hyperion 8-24mm zoom, it adapts to the camera quite well:


Baader Hyperion 8-24mm zoom mated to a Canon DSLR D1000

Afocal shots are also my favorite for Moon shots using the 8mm Hyperion zoom setting and a WO66mm petzval refractor, like below, biggest Supermoon in 18 years when it was taken.



Best,




Hernando - I've been reading Baader zoom reviews. They seem, overall, pretty good. Can you direct me to where I might locate an adapter for my camera? I'll be shooting a Sony a900 which is a Minolta mount.

Thanks - Ponz


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Happy Birthday MRNUTTY
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 11/22/11

Loc: Mendon, MA
Re: Help a Noob? new [Re: ponz]
      #5625998 - 01/16/13 10:59 AM

@ponz - of the few places shop; telescopes.com has them in stock. Optcorp.com is out of stock. It's a good eyepiece to start with.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ibase
Vendor Affiliate
*****

Reged: 03/20/08

Loc: Manila, Philippines 121*E 14*N
Re: Help a Noob? new [Re: ponz]
      #5626088 - 01/16/13 12:09 PM

Quote:



Hernando - I've been reading Baader zoom reviews. They seem, overall, pretty good. Can you direct me to where I might locate an adapter for my camera? I'll be shooting a Sony a900 which is a Minolta mount.

Thanks - Ponz




Ponz, it depends on which Baader Hyperion zoom you have; if it's the new Mark III, then you need the M43/T-2 adapter. For the BH zoom II, it's the HTA54/T2, both of them shown below:


Baader Hyperion zoom adaptors: Left - HTA54/T2 for the BH zoom II; Right - M43/T-2 for the new Mark III.


2 Baader Hyperion zoom versions with respective adapters: Left - BH Zoom II; Right - Mark III

Ordered the adapters for my Canon DSLR from Alpine Astro, (to be sure how to adapt to your particular camera, send an email, they are very friendly and knowledgeable) but the adapters are also available from other sources as mentioned in the previous post, or also at Agena.

Best,


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
oo_void
professor emeritus
*****

Reged: 11/13/09

Loc: San Francisco, CA
Re: Help a Noob? new [Re: ibase]
      #5626281 - 01/16/13 02:17 PM

I agree that the Baader Zoom is a good, first purchase for one with a new scope. It's not the widest field in the world, but you'll learn what works well with your scope and can fill in your favorite spot with a nice, wide FOV when ready. You'll also want to consider a nice planetary to go with the Baader. I went with an ES82 6.7, but a lot of people recommend Ortho's. Both are quite cheap.

As for AP though, EP projection is just the gateway drug . Lunar shots are much more easily done at prime with just a T-adapter for your camera. If planetary is your thing, I'd recommend looking into a nice webcam based imager rather than toying with projection. You can get low end cameras starting at under $100, but a nice DMK or QHY should run you between $250 and $350. Though the resolution may look low at first compared to a camera, you can get some exceptional images capturing at ~720 x 480.

Edited by oo_void (01/16/13 02:20 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
GeneT
Ely Kid
*****

Reged: 11/07/08

Loc: South Texas
Re: Help a Noob? new [Re: Hermie]
      #5626688 - 01/16/13 05:55 PM

Quote:

For me, I'm happy with about 70 degrees AFOV but other people love wide 82 or 100 degree views. I need at least 15mm eye relief because I wear glasses for observing, but many people are happy with much less.




All Delos eyepieces have 20mm of eye relief. In the Nagler line, look at the 31, 22, 17, and 12. They have eye relief ranging from 17 20mm of eye relief. I purchased eye pieces so I can do all my viewing while wearing glasses.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ponz
super member


Reged: 07/18/12

Loc: Kansas City, MO
Re: Help a Noob? new [Re: GeneT]
      #5627025 - 01/16/13 09:09 PM

Well - I ended up buying the Explore Scientific 11mm 82 degree from optcorp.com

Since my long term goal is deep space photography I decided to just fill the hole between the stock eyepieces (5mm and 20mm) that came with the scope. It didn't cost a fortune, gets good reviews and I should be able to see a difference from the stock eyepieces.

Once again, I think all you guys are wonderful for being so patient and informative with we new guys. I'm learning so much. Thanks you.

Ponz

ps - I was focused on a bird atop a tall tree two houses down and couldn't believe the light loss from the stock 20mm to the stock 5mm. Do the more expensive eyepieces exhibit the same light loss at shorter focal lengths?

Who knows, maybe the eyepiece bug will bite me.

I'll be pestering you again in a nearby thread soon!!

Edited by ponz (01/16/13 09:26 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
oo_void
professor emeritus
*****

Reged: 11/13/09

Loc: San Francisco, CA
Re: Help a Noob? new [Re: ponz]
      #5627309 - 01/17/13 12:48 AM

Just to warn you (and setting expectation accordingly) ... EP projection my give you usable results for bright objects like the moon and some of the planets, but you're going to be banging you head when it comes to DSO's. Even something bright like M13 takes hours of exposure time at prime with a good DSLR connected via t-ring, or a CCD.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
CosmoSat
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 07/24/09

Loc: India
Re: Help a Noob? new [Re: ponz]
      #5627378 - 01/17/13 02:51 AM

Quote:

I was focused on a bird atop a tall tree two houses down and couldn't believe the light loss from the stock 20mm to the stock 5mm. Do the more expensive eyepieces exhibit the same light loss at shorter focal lengths?




Yes, all eyepieces will exhibit the light loss, With magnification, the brightness curve tends to drop off in any objects that you see because the concentrated light of the image in the low power eyepiece is now spread out in a larger area in the magnified image that you are viewing.

Clear Skies!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ponz
super member


Reged: 07/18/12

Loc: Kansas City, MO
Re: Help a Noob? new [Re: oo_void]
      #5627552 - 01/17/13 07:42 AM

Quote:

Just to warn you (and setting expectation accordingly) ... EP projection my give you usable results for bright objects like the moon and some of the planets, but you're going to be banging you head when it comes to DSO's. Even something bright like M13 takes hours of exposure time at prime with a good DSLR connected via t-ring, or a CCD.




Yes, I realize that. That's why I don't want to spend a fortune on eyepieces - at least not yet

Ponz


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ponz
super member


Reged: 07/18/12

Loc: Kansas City, MO
Re: Help a Noob? new [Re: CosmoSat]
      #5627553 - 01/17/13 07:43 AM

Quote:

Quote:

I was focused on a bird atop a tall tree two houses down and couldn't believe the light loss from the stock 20mm to the stock 5mm. Do the more expensive eyepieces exhibit the same light loss at shorter focal lengths?




Yes, all eyepieces will exhibit the light loss, With magnification, the brightness curve tends to drop off in any objects that you see because the concentrated light of the image in the low power eyepiece is now spread out in a larger area in the magnified image that you are viewing.

Clear Skies!




The same principle as most long camera lenses, huh.

Ponz


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
CosmoSat
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 07/24/09

Loc: India
Re: Help a Noob? new [Re: ponz]
      #5627846 - 01/17/13 11:10 AM

No, in a camera, the aperture is stopped down by the inbuilt mechanical iris to control the light throughput.

In a telescope, the amount of light gathered by the primary to form an image is constant, what the eyepieces does is vary the size of the image so that with increase in magnification the amount of light in that image is spread out on an larger area, and hence it appears dimmer, in a lower magnified image, the light is concentrated in a smaller area and so it appears brighter.

Clear Skies!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ponz
super member


Reged: 07/18/12

Loc: Kansas City, MO
Re: Help a Noob? new [Re: CosmoSat]
      #5630576 - 01/18/13 08:59 PM

I'm baaack!

I've been enjoying tracking Jupiter the past couple of nights with my SkyWatcher 600mm 80ED APO with the stock 5mm eyepiece.

How much magnification can I squeak out of this scope?

I realize, from reading here, that seeing/atmospheric conditions play THE primary role. However, I would like to get much closer and clearer with my scope, if that's at all possible.

If so, what will a couple of hundred bucks get me?

Should I purchase a barlow and attempt to magnify the stock 5mm?

Can I ever expect decent views of Mars with my scope?

So many questions - I know.

Thanks
Ponz


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
dpwoos
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 10/18/06

Loc: United States
Re: Help a Noob? new [Re: ponz]
      #5630723 - 01/18/13 10:33 PM

You can only squeeze so much out of an 80mm scope, and most folks won't get much more out of it than you are. However, everyone is different and so why not go for it? Rather than get a 4mm eyepiece, why not use/get an 8mm and a 2x barlow, or a 12mm and a 3x barlow? That way you will have much better eye relief, and the barlow to use with other eyepieces? The best advice is to observe with folks who have stuff that you can borrow to try these options for yourself.

Also, Mars is relatively small and so I think the best you will do is see an orange ball with small white polar cap(s). Very cool, but nowhere near as impressive as Jupiter or Saturn, at least for most folks.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rob55
member


Reged: 12/15/12

Loc: Fort Polk, LA USA
Re: Help a Noob? new [Re: dpwoos]
      #5630888 - 01/19/13 12:29 AM

So if I have a 13mm plossi; I'm better off with a 3x barlow than a 4.5 plossi?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
dpwoos
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 10/18/06

Loc: United States
Re: Help a Noob? new [Re: Rob55]
      #5631221 - 01/19/13 09:47 AM

The eye relief on a (theoretical) 4.5mm plossl is really small (around 3mm), so you have to practically stick your eye on the top lens. A 13mm plossl has around 10mm eye relief, and barlowing it will increase that some. So, the result is much more comfortable viewing.

If you observe with your local astro club you will be able to try all kinds of combinations without spending any money - so I suggest doing that! If you were in my club I would pop your 13mm into my 3x TV barlow, and we would give it a try.

Edited by dpwoos (01/19/13 09:51 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
bcuddihee
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 11/04/06

Loc: Cincinnati Ohio
Re: Help a Noob? new [Re: dpwoos]
      #5631246 - 01/19/13 10:13 AM

Ponz, you will most likely bottom out on aperture rather than atmospheric conditions. Your 80mm scope will max out at around 50x per inch of aperture so..around 160x. Even at that mag, images will start looking a bit dim. I would also suggest using a barlow for this set up, but instead of a plossl I would try something that will take advantage of the scopes wide fov. I might be inclined to try an explore scientific 6.7mm 82 degree ep for 89x and then get a 1-1/2x barlow to boost it to 135x. These ep's have very good eye relief for the fl.and are quite reasonable in price.
bc


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ponz
super member


Reged: 07/18/12

Loc: Kansas City, MO
Re: Help a Noob? new [Re: bcuddihee]
      #5631369 - 01/19/13 11:24 AM

OK - Given all the wonderful advice here, what do you guys think of this?

I have the stock 5mm and 20mm eyepieces that came with the SkyWatcher and I have an Explore Scientific 11mm 82 degree eyepiece on the way.

What about getting a decent 3x barlow to work with the three aforementioned eyepieces.

That'll give me 163x with new 11mm ES, 360x with the stock 5mm and 90x with the stock 20mm.

By the way, I still don't know the difference between a plossl and an an eyepiece Wikipedia says they're one and the same?

Now - to research plossls. Does it ever end?

Thanks,
Ponz


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
bcuddihee
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 11/04/06

Loc: Cincinnati Ohio
Re: Help a Noob? new [Re: ponz]
      #5631652 - 01/19/13 02:13 PM

That sounds pretty good although you will probably never barlow the 5mm. 360x is way beyond the range of your 80 apo.
The 163 would probably be at the resolution limit. I'd be more excited about the views of open clusters and star fields with the 54x of the 11mm unbarlowed. Your best planetary views will most likely be in the 120x ish range.
bc


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Hermie
sage
*****

Reged: 04/20/05

Loc: Cloudy HKG
Re: Help a Noob? new [Re: bcuddihee]
      #5632569 - 01/20/13 02:18 AM

Ponz,

"Plossl" is simply the optical design for an eyepiece that Mr Plossl came up with a long time ago, and it is the basic eyepiece that everyone starts with. Most on the market are made in China and are fine, but there are more expensive better quality ones available (eg Televue). However, most of us move to other eyepieces for wider views or more eye relief.

I'd suggest to wait and use your ES 11mm before buying anymore eyepieces. After trying that you will understand more what other eyepieces offer.

Hermie


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)


Extra information
24 registered and 23 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  ausastronomer, droid, Scott in NC 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 1631

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics