Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Eyepieces

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)
Rick M.
super member


Reged: 03/16/13

your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)?
      #5736566 - 03/16/13 04:05 PM

I'm looking at purchasing a high power EP for a CGEM 925 HD. Do you have any favorites you would recommend? TIA

Rick


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Scott BeithAdministrator
SRF
*****

Reged: 11/26/03

Loc: Frederick, MD
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Rick M.]
      #5736597 - 03/16/13 04:28 PM

Hi Rick - welcome to CN!
There will be a lot of opinions on this. It should make for interesting reading...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ava
sage


Reged: 11/30/11

Loc: Sweden
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Scott Beith]
      #5736658 - 03/16/13 05:04 PM

Welcome to CN! The 12.5mm Baader Genuine Ortho and 10mm Carl Zeiss Jena ortho get most planet time in my 8" EdgeHD, with the 12.5mm working well most nights. Both are out of production unfortunately but they are available on the used market, if you are reasonably patient. The 12.5mm BGO has really gone up in price recently though, but for good reason IMO.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
MikeBOKC
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 05/10/10

Loc: Oklahoma City, OK
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Rick M.]
      #5736694 - 03/16/13 05:24 PM

For planets I am pleased most nights by the 11 ES 82 or the 10 Delos. If seeing won't let me go that strong, my 16 Brandon gives very nice views as well.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Arizona-Ken
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 08/31/08

Loc: Scottsdale, Arizona
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: MikeBOKC]
      #5736742 - 03/16/13 05:49 PM

XW14 (200X) or XW10 (280X) in a C11.

Arizona Ken


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
coutleef
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 02/21/08

Loc: Saint-Donat, Québec, Canada
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Arizona-Ken]
      #5736764 - 03/16/13 05:56 PM

With a f/10 scope brandons should be great. I liked a lot the bgo orthos or hd orthos but now find the xw or delos are as good and give wider views for DSOs

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Gary Riley
sage


Reged: 12/01/11

Loc: White Bluff, TN
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: coutleef]
      #5736826 - 03/16/13 06:23 PM

I enjoy the views of Jupiter and Saturn with the 13mm Hyperion (115X) and the 8mm Hyperion (188X) in my Z12 dob. Also at 230X (13mm + 2X Barlow) when seeing allows.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
azure1961p
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 01/17/09

Loc: USA
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Gary Riley]
      #5736872 - 03/16/13 06:39 PM

Hi Rick,

First Id refer yiu to this article review by Daniel Mounsey: www.cloudynights.com/documents/planetaryeyepieces.pdf

My short advice: go with some televue plossls, regarded by many t o be the best planetary oculars on the market. For some eyepieces with a custom bent Siebert optics is well regarded. Dont be afraid to add a televue barlow. Mine are essentially invisible additives in terms of detrimental effects or artifacts.

I cannot encourage you enough to read Mounseys article.

Pete

Edited by azure1961p (03/16/13 06:45 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rick M.
super member


Reged: 03/16/13

Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Gary Riley]
      #5736886 - 03/16/13 06:44 PM

Very interesting responses so far and much appreciated. I am in Prince Edward Island Canada, by the way. I need to add a 'signature'.

Rick


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Sarkikos
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 12/18/07

Loc: Suburban Maryland, USA
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Rick M.]
      #5737055 - 03/16/13 07:57 PM

XO 5.1. That puts an f/10 scope at about 0.5mm exit pupil, the highest I usually go for planet observation. IMO, the XO's are the best eyepieces for viewing planets, unless maybe you want to pay two or three times higher for a ZAO.

Mike


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Deep13
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 01/25/05

Loc: NE Ohio
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Sarkikos]
      #5737087 - 03/16/13 08:05 PM

I've not used a SCT, so I can only answer for my own scopes.

For my 5" f/12 EQ refractor, 6 or 10mm ZOA II or 8 or 11mm TV Ploessl.

8" f/6 Dob, usually not EQ, 7mm Pentax XW

12.5" f/5, 10mm XW


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Reid W
super member
*****

Reged: 10/06/10

Loc: Shreveport, LA
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Rick M.]
      #5737176 - 03/16/13 08:28 PM

Rick, for my 9.25 (not an Edge) I find that 10-13mm focal length is an ideal magnification for planetary or double star observation. My Televue 10.5 and 13mm plossels show superb images but with a narrow field. I recently picked up a ES 20mm 68 eyepece and have found that it 2x barlows well.
I have a set of Baader Hyperions and the 13mm works well, but the TV plossels give better images. The Hyperions are good, but not as good. The Hyperion 21mm does not barlow as well as the ES and has a more difficult eye placement when barlowed. I recently looked thru a variant of the Thomas Back planetary 58 degree eyepeces. These are good designs and come close to the TV plossels. I would love to try a Pentax or Vixen LVW in the 10-14mm length, but I have not had the chance.

RW.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Paraclete
super member


Reged: 01/15/11

Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Rick M.]
      #5737190 - 03/16/13 08:33 PM

Quote:

I'm looking at purchasing a high power EP for a CGEM 925 HD. Do you have any favorites you would recommend?



28RKE + 2.5x Powermate

Jupiter will just sort of "float" there, somewhere in between you and the eyepiece. You will not believe your eyes!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rick M.
super member


Reged: 03/16/13

Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Reid W]
      #5737195 - 03/16/13 08:33 PM

Thanks for the very useful post, Reid, given the similarity of your scope to mine.

Rick


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
johnnyha
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 11/12/06

Loc: Sherman Oaks, CA
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: azure1961p]
      #5737284 - 03/16/13 09:07 PM

Pete - any link to Daniel Mounsey's excellent planetary shootout should always include his update. Here is what he writes:

Quote:

BRANDON - When I first reviewed this eyepiece I was hard on it because I was hoping to get a bit more warmth out of the image for Jupiter. What I'm about to share with you may sound surprising but this occured at Charlton Flats where we conduct planetary observations. My friend Jorge and I were observing Saturn with his 8" TMB and his then new Badder binoviewer. We tested various eyepieces that night. The 12.5mm UO's, 15mm Parks Gold Series, 16mm Nagler T5's and a set of 16mm Brandons. To my amazement and Jorge's, we were actually shocked to see that the Nagler T5 16's clearly beat out both the UO and Parks GS. We could easily see less light scatter in the 16mm T5 Nagler's, then when we popped in the Brandons it was all over. The image was completely etched in tack sharp contrast and clearly out performed these other sets of eyepieces. Like I said before, I was hard on the Brandon's, but they are highly regarded eyepieces. Pons loaned me two complete sets in brass for testing. Images are completely white and neutral and are probably the finest eyepieces for solar wedges. If you've never seen sun spots in a solar wedge, trust me, you don't know what you're missing. Glass and mylar filters are not even close in comparison to a solar white light wedge! The Brandons are highly recommended and are stunning on the Moon.





Cheers!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Scanning4Comets
Markus
*****

Reged: 12/26/04

Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: johnnyha]
      #5737378 - 03/16/13 09:30 PM

Quote:

XO 5.1. That puts an f/10 scope at about 0.5mm exit pupil, the highest I usually go for planet observation. IMO, the XO's are the best eyepieces for viewing planets, unless maybe you want to pay two or three times higher for a ZAO.

Mike




CGEM 925 HD = 92.5" FL = 2349.5mm FL

That would give him 460x....far too much power.

@ F/10, you have many choices over eyepieces needed correction wise for a fast scope, but I would still get a higher quality eyepiece for planets.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rick M.
super member


Reged: 03/16/13

Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: johnnyha]
      #5737423 - 03/16/13 09:45 PM

Thanks for the link to the update, johnnyha!

Rick


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
azure1961p
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 01/17/09

Loc: USA
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Rick M.]
      #5737440 - 03/16/13 09:54 PM

JohnnyH-

Thank you very much for the update link and pertinent information. Looks quite compelling based on the the observer/author of the article. Very interesting. I want to read through his full update when I have the time.

Pete


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
HCR32
sage


Reged: 08/27/10

Loc: Australia
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: azure1961p]
      #5737493 - 03/16/13 10:25 PM

Might be expensive but you get a lot of EP for your money and pretty good performance. Leica Asph zoom. It will give you a medium to high magnification range. I used it on a f12 and it performed great on planets. Some may consider it a little wide field but that isn't enough to rule it out as a top performer.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
azure1961p
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 01/17/09

Loc: USA
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: HCR32]
      #5737534 - 03/16/13 10:51 PM

Now Im contemplating the 3-6mm nag zoom - this is surprising.

Pete


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
titanio
sage


Reged: 02/15/09

Loc: Alicante, Spain
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: azure1961p]
      #5737693 - 03/16/13 11:42 PM

Do not waste your money in expesive eyepiece for planetary using a telescope f10 Televue Plossl work very well.

Toni


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Deep13
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 01/25/05

Loc: NE Ohio
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: azure1961p]
      #5737897 - 03/17/13 01:41 AM

3 to 6mm is too much power. Maybe something in the 15mm range.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DJCalma
member


Reged: 01/17/13

Loc: Northern California
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Deep13]
      #5737914 - 03/17/13 02:00 AM

9mm. University Optics Volcano top Ortho!

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rick M.
super member


Reged: 03/16/13

Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: DJCalma]
      #5738261 - 03/17/13 09:34 AM

Reading through all the posts, I'm leaning toward 10 mm. Now to decide which one!

Rick


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Eddgie
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 02/01/06

Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Rick M.]
      #5738297 - 03/17/13 09:53 AM

I don't have a 9.25, but in a general way I can tell you what I use.

For planets, I use a binoviwer. That made more difference to me than any eyepeice choice ever has.

Because the C14 is such a big aperture, I often cannot exploit the highest powers the scope can use (you may not be able to either), but what I tend to use the most are 17mm Hyperions, 15mm Vixen NPL Plossls, and when seeing permits (rare) 13mm Hyperions. I would say the 15mm NPLs get the most use though, but only because that is about as high as I can usually go due to seeing (about 266x).

But the binoveiewers easily make more difference to me than the differece between this or that eyepeice did.

Hard to go wrong with Televue Plossls, but at the same time, you can find similarly well performing Plossls for less money.

I had the Televue 15mm and the Vixen NPLs seem to offer the same performance. In side by side comparison, there was no detail in Jupiter that I could see in the Televue that could not be seen in the Vixen NPL.

But if you want to planetary view, before you spend a lot of money on eyepeices, consider buying an inexpensive pair of binoviewers and some inexpensive 12mm Plossls and give that a try. (Don't forget that your telescope will give more magnification with a binoviewer than it will without).

Edited by Eddgie (03/17/13 11:30 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
azure1961p
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 01/17/09

Loc: USA
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Rick M.]
      #5738311 - 03/17/13 10:01 AM

Quote:

I'm looking at purchasing a high power EP for a CGEM 925 HD. Do you have any favorites you would recommend? TIA

Rick




Rick if its highpower you want 10mm isnt going to get you there. Id go no less than 7mm, or 6mm for that matter. The 10mm is a nice working mag ocular for a variety of planetary an d lunar but it simply isnt highpower for that scope. 10mm by contrast is a nice medium power as is 13mm. A 5 or 4mm orthoscopic is the high end of highpower for your set up that could prove to be rather conditional for
planetary use. It has its place but its a narrow niche.

Pete


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rick M.
super member


Reged: 03/16/13

Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: azure1961p]
      #5738360 - 03/17/13 10:38 AM

Pete, I'm thinking I could get a 10 mm. and use a Barlow for those very rare times that atmospheric conditions permit. Does that sound reasonable?

Rick


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Sarkikos
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 12/18/07

Loc: Suburban Maryland, USA
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Scanning4Comets]
      #5738396 - 03/17/13 10:58 AM

Markus,

Quote:

Quote:

XO 5.1. That puts an f/10 scope at about 0.5mm exit pupil, the highest I usually go for planet observation. IMO, the XO's are the best eyepieces for viewing planets, unless maybe you want to pay two or three times higher for a ZAO.

Mike




CGEM 925 HD = 92.5" FL = 2349.5mm FL

That would give him 460x....far too much power.




That is a broad generalization. Far too much power for what object, under what conditions, for what instrument and for what observer?

460x would be about 50x per inch and a 0.5mm exit pupil. As I said, that is the highest I'll usually go for planet observation. But I've often gone that high for Mars and Saturn, though I usually stay closer to 300x for Jupiter.

Unless the observer lives permanently under the jet stream, 50x per inch is certainly doable for bright planets if the instrument has decent optics. In fact, I recently pushed my C6 SCT to 294x - about 49x per inch - when viewing Jupiter under good seeing, with good results. Luckily, I have a C6 with excellent optics. I'm pretty sure a 925 HD could do as well as a C6.

Mike


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
droid
rocketman
*****

Reged: 08/29/04

Loc: Conneaut, Ohio
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Sarkikos]
      #5738545 - 03/17/13 12:46 PM

Hmmmm interesting question.....and your liable to get dozens of answers, lol.
And theres a good reason for that , we see differantly....at 56 my eyes aint what they used to be....some one say in theyre 20s or even early 30s with normal vision, may see very differantly.

My two favorite eps for high power views, only in my f/10 4inch refractor , are the 10mm Rini planetary, puchased from Sarkikos, it has a narrower fov, and took a bit of use to learn to get my eye at the sweet spot and keep it there. And my new to me Nagler type 2 with a 2x ED barlow.for a 6mm view.
which gives me roughly 170x with the nagler barlow combo ,still under the 50x per inch. and 102x with the 10mm.way under the 50x per inch limit.
Forced to choose one, Id choose the nagler / barlow combo for obvious reasons.

But thats just my observing. And Ive never looked through dozens if not hundreds of very good eps....so your results ..will...vary.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rick Woods
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 01/27/05

Loc: Inner Solar System
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: droid]
      #5738659 - 03/17/13 01:55 PM

Re. the original question: When conditions allow its use, the Brandon 6mm is the finest planetary eyepiece I've ever used.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Eddgie
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 02/01/06

Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Sarkikos]
      #5738763 - 03/17/13 02:40 PM

In theory, there is no limit to magnification.

For example, look at some of the best images taken with large reflectors. These scopes are often working with the equivilent of a 2mm to 4mm eyepeice.

But if you attempted to use this much power visually, it would produce a horrible image.

The telscope presents all of the detail it is capable of rendering with the magnification reaches about 1.1x per millimeter of aperture. This is when the smallest detail that the scope is capable of resolving is provided with sufficient angular magnification to be resolved at the focal plane.

Past this, you can go bigger and bigger, but no new detail is ever presented.

Ah, but what happens is that the illumination falls. The eye likes illumination. For a given contrast of a given detail, the brighter you make that part of the image, the easier it is for the eye to see it.

For the average observer, the illumination starts to fall once the exit pupil gets smaller than abou .8mm. Larger details with more contrats get bigger and easier to see maybe, but the smallest, lowest contrast detail starts to fall below the observer's contrast sensitivity threshold.

The right power for every obesrver will vary with the target and conditions of course, and I would never tell people that there is no value to pushing higher because image scale in itself can be pleasing.

But once you go past about 1.1x to 1.3x per millimeter of aperture, you make the image bigger, but often at the risk of loosing some of the more enrichig detail.

In my own scopes, I find a 1mm exit pupil to give me about the most detail I can extract from a planet. Past this, I can make it bigger, but usually no new detail is presented. And past about .7mm, and I can see that the most challanging detail is fading.

But this is me. We are all different.

The main reason I resist the message that 50X per inch is the right planetary detail is because over the years, I have heard so many people question if their telescopes were defective. They would read these reports about 50x per inch, but when they used their scopes, they were not seeing any new detail.

They thought their scopes must be defective because the message seemd to be that the more power you use, the more detail you would see.

And it doesn't work that way for most of us.

Factor in seeing, and 300x is the practical limit for most of us on most of the time anyway, but someone should not be surprised at all if they find that going to 50x per inch doesn't result in additional detail.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
johnnyha
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 11/12/06

Loc: Sherman Oaks, CA
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Eddgie]
      #5738785 - 03/17/13 02:48 PM

Quote:

In my own scopes, I find a 1mm exit pupil to give me about the most detail I can extract from a planet. Past this, I can make it bigger, but usually no new detail is presented. And past about .7mm, and I can see that the most challanging detail is fading.




+1. I have confirmed this since getting my Leica Zoom, it is readily apparent that the planet dims below 1mm to a point where there is a loss of resolution - it starts getting "grainy" looking. On a good night I can go a little less but at .5mm it is much, much dimmer than 1mm and the difference is not 2X it is 4X+ dimmer.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Sarkikos
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 12/18/07

Loc: Suburban Maryland, USA
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Eddgie]
      #5739089 - 03/17/13 04:47 PM

Eddgie,

Quote:

In theory, there is no limit to magnification.




Yes. Actually this has been my first response to observers who question why I don't push the power more for some objects. Of course, you can increase the magnification to whatever your telescope, eyepiece and Barlow will produce. But the resulting image may look like a wooly smudge and may show you less detail than you could have seen at a much lower magnification.

And as a matter of fact, I have often been the champion of less is more when it comes to magnification for observing planets.

Quote:

For example, look at some of the best images taken with large reflectors. These scopes are often working with the equivilent of a 2mm to 4mm eyepeice.

But if you attempted to use this much power visually, it would produce a horrible image.




I don't even want to compare photography with visual, except maybe to find out how much I'm able to see without all the fancy AP equipment and computer processing.

Quote:

The telscope presents all of the detail it is capable of rendering with the magnification reaches about 1.1x per millimeter of aperture. This is when the smallest detail that the scope is capable of resolving is provided with sufficient angular magnification to be resolved at the focal plane. Past this, you can go bigger and bigger, but no new detail is ever presented.




1.1x per mm of aperture would be about 28x per inch, or about 280x in my 10" Dob. I'm not sure if we should take this as a hard and fast rule. In fact, I'm sure it isn't. There are too many factors involved.

For instance, the adaptation level of the eye should be taken into account. If the eye can be kept closer to photopic, more detail can be seen in the image of a planet at a more moderate level of magnification. If the eye is looking at fainter objects and is well dark-adapted, then more magnification will be needed to begin to see structure in the object. I've seen both of these effects for myself many times.

Also, even among bright planets, I've seen a difference in "best" magnification. As a general rule, Saturn and Mars do better at higher magnifications than Jupiter. Many observers have seen this. The reasons are probably both the different types of contrast for these objects and also the different image scales of the objects themselves. Personally, I think Mars does well at higher than 28x per inch, sometimes much higher, particularly when its apparent diameter is less than about 7 arcsec.

Quote:

The main reason I resist the message that 50X per inch is the right planetary detail is because over the years, I have heard so many people question if their telescopes were defective. They would read these reports about 50x per inch, but when they used their scopes, they were not seeing any new detail.




I would never make the blanket statement that 50x per inch is the "right" magnification for planet detail. Just as I would never have said that 50x per inch is "too much magnification." Experience should tell us that the interaction among equipment, observer, object and atmosphere is much more complicated than that. Rules of thumb are not laws of nature.

Quote:

They thought their scopes must be defective because the message seemd to be that the more power you use, the more detail you would see.




This, of course, is a newbie attitude. Reality is more nuanced. Unfortunately, I've seen this attitude too often in more experienced observers who should know better.

Quote:

Factor in seeing, and 300x is the practical limit for most of us on most of the time anyway, but someone should not be surprised at all if they find that going to 50x per inch doesn't result in additional detail.




Of course. On the other hand, this doesn't mean than an experienced observer cannot appreciate what a good instrument can do under the right conditions when observing some objects.

Mike


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
azure1961p
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 01/17/09

Loc: USA
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Rick M.]
      #5739250 - 03/17/13 05:54 PM

Quote:

Pete, I'm thinking I could get a 10 mm. and use a Barlow for those very rare times that atmospheric conditions permit. Does that sound reasonable?

Rick




Sounds very reasonable . A 2x televue barlow would be a great thing. To that end dont rule out a 3x barlow farther down the road for superhighpower doublestar or planetary nebula study. Itd be too much on the planets but fine on the targets mentioned . Itd be specialty barlow while the 2x would be more of a working tool with the 10mm. On a small mars, saturn or neptune in 7/10 seeing the 2x would be a fine thing.

Stay in touch and post your finds. That IS a great scope you have.


Pete


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rick M.
super member


Reged: 03/16/13

Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: azure1961p]
      #5739341 - 03/17/13 06:28 PM

Thanks, Pete!

Rick


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
CollinofAlabama
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 11/24/03

Loc: Lubbock, Texas, USA
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Rick M.]
      #5739441 - 03/17/13 07:08 PM

Rick,

Don't own a very long focal ratio instrument, but I'd have to say the 12mm Brandon does a great job, particularly in combination with my old school, long tube Made in Japan 2x Orion Barlow (I'm sure a TV 2x would do at least as well). I also like the TeleVue Nagler T6 series. In my case, the 7mm works wonders if the Brandon/Barlow is too much power. For you, I'd think the 9 or 11mm models work work more consistently for you, since a 7mm would likely be too much power most nights in your scope.

Good luck


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mdowns
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 06/12/10

Loc: Englewood,FL
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Rick M.]
      #5739498 - 03/17/13 07:41 PM

Rick,
In my c11 my fav is a 12mm brandon,8mm brandon on steady nights and a bco 10mm coming in at third.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Lane
Post Laureate


Reged: 11/19/07

Loc: Frisco, Texas
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: azure1961p]
      #5740104 - 03/18/13 05:01 AM

For DSO high power viewing in the 9.25 I generally use a 10mm Pentax XW. If seeing will not support it then I drop to the a 12mm Nagler or 13mm Ethos. If seeing is really good then I will use a 9mm Nagler.

I prefer Orthos for planetary viewing, but I don't generally use Orthos with my SCTs unless I attach my crawford focuser to the back. I find the narrow field of view causes problems due the mirror shift when focusing. For that reason the 10mm Pentax XW is normally what I will use on planets.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Sarkikos
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 12/18/07

Loc: Suburban Maryland, USA
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Lane]
      #5740156 - 03/18/13 06:52 AM

The XW's are great wide-field eyepieces for planets. Well, they are wide-field compared to orthos - 70 degrees vs 44 degrees.

Mike


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rick M.
super member


Reged: 03/16/13

Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Sarkikos]
      #5740227 - 03/18/13 08:31 AM

Hmmm...I will have to look into Pentax XW. How does the 10mm. Delos compare? I see a thread on Delos vs. Pentax XW but the 10mm. eyepieces are not compared.

Rick


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Sarkikos
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 12/18/07

Loc: Suburban Maryland, USA
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Rick M.]
      #5740239 - 03/18/13 08:41 AM

I've never looked through a Delos, but judging from the reports I've read, it seems a toss up, at least for planet observation. So that would make me gravitate toward the XW's, which are less expensive whether bought new or used.

For deep sky, there may be an advantage to the Delos. Some observers say the Delos have a bit better light transmission than the XW. But if the Delos do not actually have better light transmission - or somehow allow dimmer objects to be perceived than through the XW's - I see no advantage for the Delos over the XW's.

Mike


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
andydj5xp
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 05/27/04

Loc: 52.269 N/10.571 E
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Sarkikos]
      #5740292 - 03/18/13 09:16 AM

Quote:

For deep sky, there may be an advantage to the Delos. Some observers say the Delos have a bit better light transmission than the XW.




The intensity perception of the human eye is a logarithmical one. Light throughput differences of say 3% (98% to 95%) would correspond to just 0.26dB in logarithmical measures. I have a hard time to imagine that anybody would be even close to discriminating such minute intensity differences.

I'm aware that some fellow CNers report to be able to do so. But the noticed differences will almost certainly not been caused by intensity differences but something else. There are lots of possible sources for perceived differences between eyepieces.

Andreas


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Sarkikos
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 12/18/07

Loc: Suburban Maryland, USA
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: andydj5xp]
      #5740415 - 03/18/13 10:30 AM

Andreas,

I am skeptical but have an open mind to reports from first-hand experience in the field. On the other hand, I allow theory and studies to inform my experience, not determine it.

The received data from perception studies might be based on conditions, objects and subjects that are not strictly transferable to amateur astronomy. When attempting to discern faint, LSB objects near the LM of an instrument, I think it might be possible for small differences in light transmission to have a more crucial effect.

Quote:

I'm aware that some fellow CNers report to be able to do so. But the noticed differences will almost certainly not been caused by intensity differences but something else. There are lots of possible sources for perceived differences between eyepieces.




The variation in perception of faint objects through different eyepieces might not be due to an appreciable difference in light transmission that is measureable through instrumentation. The effect might be due to other attributes of the eyepieces. But still, a perceived variation is there and will make a difference in the discernment of faint objects through the eyepiece.

Maybe we should be using a different term than "light transmission" to make the Optics Police happy. Maybe something like "Perceived Limiting Magnitude" would be better?


Mike


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Sorny
professor emeritus


Reged: 03/15/12

Loc: Southern MN
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Sarkikos]
      #5740788 - 03/18/13 02:03 PM

15mm or 20mm in my binoviewer, with the power switch either disengaged, or using barlow or reducer depending on seeing. I do most of my viewing with the 20mm pair, not just planetary.

If I'm going mono, then it is either my 8mm or 13mm or 17mm depending on seeing conditions. I've got a C11, so what works for me won't be quite the same as a C9.25...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rich V.
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 01/02/05

Loc: Lake Tahoe area, Nevada, USA
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Rick M.]
      #5740837 - 03/18/13 02:34 PM

With my C9.25 I find my XW 10 is most useful for planetary. On rare nights of great seeing the XW 7 comes into play.

Seeing would have to be crazy good to be able to use an eyepiece that's less than 7mm in a C9.25 so barlowing a 10mm probably wouldn't be very useful for you on most nights...

I used Plossls before I got into Pentax EPs and they were fine for planetary viewing with a driven scope so you don't have to break the bank if you don't want to.

Rich


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Lane
Post Laureate


Reged: 11/19/07

Loc: Frisco, Texas
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Sorny]
      #5740854 - 03/18/13 02:46 PM

The view in the 6mm Delos does look more curved to me than the view in the 5mm or the 7mm Pentax XW. However the stars are still sharp all the way across. So I suppose it is not really a problem but it does look different for some reason. The same thing might apply to the 10mm eyepieces.

For light transmission, I have compared my 6mm Ortho to my 6mm Delos and compared my 7mm Ortho to my 7mm Pentax XW just to see if I could find a faint star in one that I could not find in the other, but I was not able to find one. I was also comparing other eyepieces at the same time, two of them being the TMB Planetary 6mm and 7mm, and I was able to see a very faint star in my Delos/Pentax eyepieces that I could find in the TMB eyepieces. So it is definitely possible to have light transmission differences that can be detected.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Sarkikos
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 12/18/07

Loc: Suburban Maryland, USA
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Lane]
      #5741166 - 03/18/13 05:05 PM

This agrees with my experience. When I had TMB Planetaries, the image always seemed darker compared to other eyepieces of the same focal length.

Mike


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Phil Cowell
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 05/24/07

Loc: Southern Tier NY
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Sarkikos]
      #5741425 - 03/18/13 06:55 PM

12mm and with good seeing 8mm Brandon's. Good color rendition razor sharp on planets. Give them a try in your scope the view speaks for itself. Better than descriptions can.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
johnnyha
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 11/12/06

Loc: Sherman Oaks, CA
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Sarkikos]
      #5741428 - 03/18/13 06:56 PM

I had a TMB Planetary and the view actually WAS coffee-colored.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Sarkikos
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 12/18/07

Loc: Suburban Maryland, USA
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: johnnyha]
      #5741438 - 03/18/13 07:00 PM

They make TV Plossls look like cafe au lait!

Mike


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rick M.
super member


Reged: 03/16/13

Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Sarkikos]
      #5741682 - 03/18/13 08:37 PM

I must say I'm amazed by the wealth of knowledge/experience displayed in this thread!

Rick


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
azure1961p
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 01/17/09

Loc: USA
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Rick M.]
      #5741710 - 03/18/13 08:48 PM

Just keep in mind a lot of experience and opinion is from many with focal ratios shorter than 10 and thats significant.

Pete


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rick M.
super member


Reged: 03/16/13

Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: azure1961p]
      #5741795 - 03/18/13 09:25 PM

Quote:

Just keep in mind a lot of experience and opinion is from many with focal ratios shorter than 10 and thats significant.

Pete




Good point, Pete.

Rick


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Sarkikos
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 12/18/07

Loc: Suburban Maryland, USA
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Rick M.]
      #5741814 - 03/18/13 09:37 PM

The original question was for a favorite high power eyepiece for planet observation in an f/10 scope. My favorite eyepiece for high-power planet viewing in my C6 f/10 SCT is a Pentax XO 5.1 - amazing as that may sound to some observers.

The C6 is my only f/10 scope, but I do have scopes from f/4 to f/13.

Mike


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
azure1961p
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 01/17/09

Loc: USA
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Sarkikos]
      #5741858 - 03/18/13 09:52 PM

Quote:

The original question was for a favorite high power eyepiece for planet observation in an f/10 scope. My favorite eyepiece for high-power planet viewing in my C6 f/10 SCT is a Pentax XO 5.1 - amazing as that may sound to some observers.

The C6 is my only f/10 scope, but I do have scopes from f/4 to f/13.

Mike




I wasnt referring to you Mike. I trust your results as a rule actually. It is a n issue I've seen rear its head elsewhere enough to think it worthy of mentioning.

Cheers,

Pete


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Scott BeithAdministrator
SRF
*****

Reged: 11/26/03

Loc: Frederick, MD
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: azure1961p]
      #5741972 - 03/18/13 10:38 PM

8mm and 11mm TV Plossls get my vote depending on seeing conditions.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
nevy
professor emeritus
*****

Reged: 02/07/12

Loc: UK
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: Scott Beith]
      #5742055 - 03/18/13 11:39 PM

In my C11 (F10) , with the usuall yukky seeing on most nights a17 mm tv plossl or 17 ethos is about all it can take but ocassionally when seeing permits , a 13 or 10 can be used , the 10 would give 280x.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
nevy
professor emeritus
*****

Reged: 02/07/12

Loc: UK
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: nevy]
      #5742056 - 03/18/13 11:42 PM

Although things could change since I got a cat cooler , I haven't had the chance to use it yet.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Sarkikos
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 12/18/07

Loc: Suburban Maryland, USA
Re: your favorite EP for planetary observation (f/10)? new [Re: azure1961p]
      #5742342 - 03/19/13 06:51 AM

Quote:

Quote:

The original question was for a favorite high power eyepiece for planet observation in an f/10 scope. My favorite eyepiece for high-power planet viewing in my C6 f/10 SCT is a Pentax XO 5.1 - amazing as that may sound to some observers.

The C6 is my only f/10 scope, but I do have scopes from f/4 to f/13.

Mike




I wasnt referring to you Mike. I trust your results as a rule actually. It is a n issue I've seen rear its head elsewhere enough to think it worthy of mentioning.

Cheers,

Pete




Understood. I just wanted to underline the point that it wasn't me you were talking about.


Mike


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)


Extra information
29 registered and 26 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  ausastronomer, Scott in NC, iceblaze 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 1780

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics