AstroBobo
sage
Reged: 07/04/07
Loc: Zagreb, Croatia
|
Films for astrophotography
#2140072 - 01/23/08 11:23 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I think we should make a sticky thread (or whatever it is called) about films for astrophotography as this is definitely the most common question here. I recently discovered Robert Reeves' website and his test of various b&w, negative and diapositive films, so here are the links to anyone interested:
B&W films Color negative films Slide films
Also, it would be nice if some of you could reply here and write your experiences with various films.
Personally I found Kodak E200 to have the best red response (I have also push-developed it with success) and Provia 400F for everything else.
|
microbes
Pooh-Bah
   
Reged: 12/12/04
Loc: Romulus, Sector 12
|
Re: Films for astrophotography
[Re: AstroBobo]
#2140560 - 01/23/08 03:58 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Your link for color negative films lists Fuji Superia X-tra 800 speed as the best color negative film. I have tryed several different color negative films and would have to agree, it has the both the best red response and the lowest reciprocity failure. It isn't as good as some of the slide films (like E200), but it's worlds better than stuff like T-max.
|
Mopman
sage
   
Reged: 10/14/06
Loc: Richland, WA, USA
|
Re: Films for astrophotography
[Re: microbes]
#2141690 - 01/24/08 01:23 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Here is another film link ... Thanks, Mopman http://www.astropix.com/HTML/I_ASTROP/FILM/FILMS.HTM
|
Suk Lee
Post Laureate
   
Reged: 10/07/03
Loc: Pleasanton, CA
|
Re: Films for astrophotography
[Re: Mopman]
#2141777 - 01/24/08 03:36 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Now sticky!
|
AstroBobo
sage
Reged: 07/04/07
Loc: Zagreb, Croatia
|
Re: Films for astrophotography
[Re: Suk Lee]
#2142126 - 01/24/08 10:11 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Thanks Suk!
|
Hambone
sage
   
Reged: 10/10/05
Loc: Martin, TN
|
Re: Films for astrophotography
[Re: AstroBobo]
#2143521 - 01/24/08 08:54 PM Attachment (350 downloads)
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Fuji Super HQ 400 negative film and Fujichrome HQ 400 slide film has decent red response. They are also easier to find than the good stuff.
Here are some examples of HQ 400.
This is a Prime Focus, 30 minute unprocessed shot of The North American Nebula using a 8" SVP with a Olympus OM-1 and 200mm lens at F 4.5
|
Hambone
sage
   
Reged: 10/10/05
Loc: Martin, TN
|
Re: Films for astrophotography
[Re: Hambone]
#2143534 - 01/24/08 08:59 PM Attachment (359 downloads)
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Here is another shot the same as above but using Fujichrome Super HQ 400 slide film, 20 minutes,(I think) and a 135mm lens.
Edited by Hambone (01/24/08 09:04 PM)
|
stargazerken
member
Reged: 12/27/08
Loc: Fort Meade, Florida
|
Re: Films for astrophotography
[Re: Hambone]
#2837014 - 01/01/09 04:49 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Anyone try Kodak Ultra Max? I picked up a roll of 400 speed, but clouds have stop any try at taking a shot. Thanks.
|
chgomonitor
member
Reged: 09/18/08
|
Re: Films for astrophotography
[Re: stargazerken]
#3182127 - 06/25/09 01:06 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
-Tried the Kodak Ultra Max at 800 speed. Bad grain and seemed to really fog up on me rather badly after about 30 seconds. Also had a definite green color cast. Switched to Fuji.
|
Matthew Ota
Hmmm
Reged: 04/30/05
Loc: IngleHood, California
|
Re: Films for astrophotography
[Re: chgomonitor]
#3236466 - 07/24/09 05:41 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
When I did film astrophotography I got great results using Kodak 400LE. It is their "Law Enforcement" film and it has great red response. I guess originally it was great for showing blood....
|
Matthew Ota
Hmmm
Reged: 04/30/05
Loc: IngleHood, California
|
Re: Films for astrophotography
[Re: Matthew Ota]
#3248829 - 07/31/09 01:34 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I found this print film on the web and I wonder if anybody here has tried it:
Photo Evidence Film
|
M111
scholastic sledgehammer
Reged: 06/28/06
Loc: Western MA
|
Re: Films for astrophotography
[Re: Matthew Ota]
#3248871 - 07/31/09 01:55 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Haven't tried it, but if it's good for blood maybe it's good for red emission nebulae too...
|
huckabuck
professor emeritus
   
Reged: 02/18/07
Loc: statesboro, ga
|
Re: Films for astrophotography
[Re: M111]
#3248930 - 07/31/09 02:26 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
if the shipping wasn't so ridiculas i'd give it a try
|
PaulEK
sage
   
Reged: 05/25/08
Loc: Wisconsin
|
Re: Films for astrophotography
[Re: AstroBobo]
#3262259 - 08/08/09 11:50 PM Attachment (244 downloads)
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Here's a crop (about 60-70% of the frame) from the center of a shot I took a couple of years ago, using Fuji Provia 400f slide film. If my memory is correct, I took it using my Nikon F, with a 50mm f/1.4 lens set at f/2.8. I didn't take careful note to time the shot precisely because I took several of varying length, and this one turned out the best. but I think it was about 10 minutes.
What I like about this film is that, though it doesn't record the reds as well as other films I've seen used, it is very sharp, with little grain, and it seems to have a low reciprocity failure rate. I've not done -- and wouldn't know how to do -- scientific comparisons, but I've taken astrophotos with my Mamiya RB67 (which I have not yet scanned to my satisfaction) that have lots and lots of very tiny stars on them!
I have noticed that the film seems to show more purple than I think it should.
Edited by PaulEK (08/09/09 12:03 AM)
|
PaulEK
sage
   
Reged: 05/25/08
Loc: Wisconsin
|
Re: Films for astrophotography
[Re: AstroBobo]
#3262273 - 08/09/09 12:00 AM Attachment (178 downloads)
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Here's a much closer to 100% crop. And the more I think about it, the longer I think the exposure was. 15 minutes?
|
Saturnalia
member
Reged: 12/17/09
|
Re: Films for astrophotography
[Re: PaulEK]
#3546241 - 01/07/10 06:20 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
AstroBobo - the three links in your original first message here are not working.
Any chance of fixing them...?
|
tommyhawk13
scholastic sledgehammer
   
Reged: 09/28/07
Loc: Jacksonville, Fl
|
Re: Films for astrophotography
[Re: Saturnalia]
#3561196 - 01/14/10 07:49 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Saturnalia, a lot has changed since the info on the links was posted. Fuji Provia 400F has been discontinued, and replaced by Provia 400X. It's an ok film, but it has poorer red response. Not bad, but not as good as the old stuff.
Kodak E-200, Elite 200, or Ektachrome 200 is king right now. It picks up red (Hydrogen Alpha) like nobody's business. Even though it's rated at 200, it picks up photons faster than the 400 after only a few minutes. It suffers from reciprocity failure like any film, but not nearly as bad. Some say that it is as fast as the old hypered films.
Both the Fuji and Kodak films are slide films.
Hope this helps.
|
stargazerken
member
Reged: 12/27/08
Loc: Fort Meade, Florida
|
Re: Films for astrophotography
[Re: tommyhawk13]
#4302186 - 01/09/11 10:42 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Any leads on a good color print film for astrophotos? I do mainly CCD now, but would like to do wide field again. I have the equipment for slides, but just need to buy new chemicals for processing
|
Nightfly
scholastic sledgehammer
Reged: 06/20/07
Loc: Eastern Maine, USA
|
Re: Films for astrophotography
[Re: stargazerken]
#4302782 - 01/09/11 03:22 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Kodak Gold 200 does a good job:
 Kodak Gold 200 Test- Milky Way by Nightfly Photography, on Flickr
|
stargazerken
member
Reged: 12/27/08
Loc: Fort Meade, Florida
|
Re: Films for astrophotography
[Re: Nightfly]
#4303558 - 01/09/11 09:50 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Thanks Nightfly; excellent photo! I will have to pick up a roll or two and get some pics done next dark period.
|
Starmon
member
Reged: 05/25/09
Loc: Front Range Northern Colorado
|
Re: Films for astrophotography
[Re: Nightfly]
#4382077 - 02/12/11 08:55 PM Attachment (277 downloads)
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I agree Nightfly, but since I have a dark site to image at, I use 400 and have returned good results. But, I'm also looking for better film, so I'm going to try the Fuji Superia and the LE. I do enjoy capturing those red nebulae. Wide Field Southern Summer Sky at Keota
|
Geo.
Carpal Tunnel
   
Reged: 10/01/08
Loc: Upstate NY
|
Re: Films for astrophotography
[Re: stargazerken]
#4398751 - 02/20/11 08:09 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I'd stock up on Ektachrome if you like it. Kodak has stopped making it in sheet form. Anyone have experience with any of the Central European films Freestylephoto.biz imports?
|
Geo.
Carpal Tunnel
   
Reged: 10/01/08
Loc: Upstate NY
|
Links for: Films for astrophotography
[Re: microbes]
#4398758 - 02/20/11 08:14 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Try http://www.robertreeves.com/
|
telletdl
member
Reged: 07/22/08
Loc: Alexandria, VA
|
Re: Films for astrophotography
[Re: stargazerken]
#4412798 - 02/26/11 12:03 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Just scored two rolls of E200 (35mm) at my local camera store. So there is still some of it floating around out there.
|
Nightfly
scholastic sledgehammer
Reged: 06/20/07
Loc: Eastern Maine, USA
|
Re: Films for astrophotography
[Re: telletdl]
#4413513 - 02/26/11 06:30 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
There is some E200, Elite Chrome 200, and even Provia 400F on the evil bay. I scored some fresh frozen 400F last month. Get it while you can.
|
NGC 4755
newbie
Reged: 06/03/08
Loc: Queensland, Australia
|
Re: Films for astrophotography
[Re: stargazerken]
#5173465 - 04/15/12 10:42 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Ilford's HP5 is more red sensitive than any other. Try some! DEv. 8 mins in neat Microphen at 20C.
|
Nightfly
scholastic sledgehammer
Reged: 06/20/07
Loc: Eastern Maine, USA
|
Re: Films for astrophotography
[Re: NGC 4755]
#5177704 - 04/17/12 10:06 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
My test of Kodak's T-Max 400.
http://nightflyphotography.blogspot.com/2012/04/testing-kodaks-tmax-400-for.html
|
GaryS
sage
   
Reged: 10/30/06
|
Re: Films for astrophotography
[Re: Nightfly]
#5178303 - 04/18/12 11:16 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Hi James:
Have you had any experience with Fuji's Neopan 100 Acros? The spec sheet claims some pretty impressive reciprocity characteristics -- only 1/2 stop loss for 1000 seconds (16 minutes).
Gary
|
Nightfly
scholastic sledgehammer
Reged: 06/20/07
Loc: Eastern Maine, USA
|
Re: Films for astrophotography
[Re: GaryS]
#5178435 - 04/18/12 12:51 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Hi Gary,
Sure thing. I have been working with Acros for some time now and it is a suberb film. It is not a great H-alpha film, but it is a strong recorder of starlight.
Here is a sample:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/12598495@N08/sets/72157622491249838/detail/
Two of the frames in the above gallery have been selected for the Starstruck exhibit. I hope you get a chance to see the exhibit.
http://www.bates.edu/museum/exhibitions/upcoming/starstruck/
James
|
GaryS
sage
   
Reged: 10/30/06
|
Re: Films for astrophotography
[Re: Nightfly]
#5178814 - 04/18/12 04:05 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Hi James:
Thanks for the photos -- really great stuff. I think I've seen these before, but somehow didn't notice they were shot with Acros. One last question, while on the topic, what is your view of push processing the Acros. It doesn't seem like you've done so, but I wondered if there was a reason.
Congrats on getting into the Starstruck exhibit. It's a distinction that's well earned!
Gary
|
Nightfly
scholastic sledgehammer
Reged: 06/20/07
Loc: Eastern Maine, USA
|
Re: Films for astrophotography
[Re: GaryS]
#5179043 - 04/18/12 06:25 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Thank you Gary, I've enjoyed myself with these images. I use standard development with Xtol 1:1 for all my Acros work. I have been wanting to try pushing the film and have seen good results in terestrial photography up to ISO 1600. One was with Caffenol-C using Folgers crystals! Pushing Acros with astro work may be different. I suspect contrast could be an issue.
Acros does work very well Hypered as we have seen with the work of Rick Thurmond. The gains were substantial. Acros does well right out of the box of course and seems to continue out to an hour and beyond.
I've been wanting to experiment with some red sensitive films, but have not had the time. Films to think about are Rollei Retro 80S and Superpan 200. Extended red films in the past have been disapointing, but one must be willing to try them! I've done my share and it seems I will perhaps continue this lesson in futility.
I think it is great that you continue to shoot film Gary. I enjoy your new Filmadvance blog. I'll chime in from time to time.
James
|
GaryS
sage
   
Reged: 10/30/06
|
Re: Films for astrophotography
[Re: Nightfly]
#5180041 - 04/19/12 11:06 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Thanks for the info James. And thanks for the inspiration too. I've been shooting Acros 100 for daylight stuff, but was seriously tempted to try some night-sky shots when I saw its reciprocity characteristics. And now that I've seen your work, I'm going to load up the Hassy and give it a try next time I'm under a good, dark sky.
I also really like your moonlit shots as well. So much good stuff there.
(BTW -- drop me a line some time at my regular e-mail address. I have some questions regarding developers that I suspect will bore the pants off CN readers.)
Thanks again, Gary
|
OneGear
member
Reged: 12/30/11
|
Re: Films for astrophotography
[Re: stargazerken]
#5715751 - 03/06/13 02:10 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
All links are dead. Anyone have new links to useful info?
|
Michal1
sage
Reged: 07/25/10
Loc: Czech Republic, Central Europe
|
Re: Films for astrophotography
[Re: OneGear]
#5716580 - 03/06/13 02:44 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Hi OneGear! Nightfly has made a lot of film tests. Look here and here.
|