Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

The long-awaited conversion to CN 3.0 is imminent. Please see this thread for important information.

General Astronomy >> Beginners Forum

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)
jca345
member


Reged: 09/06/13

Loc: SE Pennsylvania
Apo Refractor vs. Questar
      #6217606 - 11/26/13 04:45 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THV1OEKqw98

*BLEEP*...

I love my Apo, but I wouldn't turn down a nice view through anything!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Geo31
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 01/28/13

Loc: Kingwood, TX
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: jca345]
      #6217881 - 11/26/13 07:01 PM

OMG, that's about right.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
GOLGO13
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 11/05/05

Loc: St. Louis area
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: jca345]
      #6218639 - 11/27/13 05:31 AM

That is a classic. I think it would be cool to have a questar, but it's pretty hard to drop a lot of money on one new or used. Almost more of a piece of art to me than something I would regularly use.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
A6Q6
professor emeritus


Reged: 05/31/11

Loc: Stroudsburg,Pa,U.S.A
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: jca345]
      #6219605 - 11/27/13 03:08 PM

Yes, it is a classic that's always fun to watch.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
StarStuff1
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 04/01/07

Loc: South of the Mason-Dixon Line
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: A6Q6]
      #6219992 - 11/27/13 06:13 PM

The first time I looked through a Questar was about 30 years ago. Seeing a diffraction ring around Regulus with such a small scope was an unexpected treat.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Billytk
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 04/22/12

Loc: Lake Mary, Fl.
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: StarStuff1]
      #6220121 - 11/27/13 07:18 PM Attachment (24 downloads)

I had one briefly. It was beautiful.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Eric P
sage
*****

Reged: 04/04/05

Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: jca345]
      #6221775 - 11/28/13 03:53 PM

lol... I made that a few years ago. Literally scripted from the endless bickering on the old SAA news group.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
kkokkolisModerator
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 09/23/09

Loc: Piraeus, Greece
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: Eric P]
      #6221822 - 11/28/13 04:05 PM

On that video I see what we should never do with beginners.
We are all beginners one way or another as we evolve in the hoobby and we expand our activities in several branches of it.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
dyslexic nam
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 01/28/08

Loc: PEI, Canada
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: kkokkolis]
      #6222011 - 11/28/13 05:29 PM

That is pretty funny. Though my kids were (and still are) looking over my shoulder and were a bit disappointed...

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
WOBentleyModerator
Deep Sky Denizen
*****

Reged: 09/16/09

Loc: Pacific Northwest USA
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: dyslexic nam]
      #6222204 - 11/28/13 07:32 PM

I agree that as an experienced adult it is somewhat funny, but it needs to be seen as an example of how not to approach Astronomy for Beginners IMHO.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Paco_Grande
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 07/14/12

Loc: Banana Republic of California
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: WOBentley]
      #6222380 - 11/28/13 09:25 PM

I don't find the video humorous at all. No one in their right mind would hold such a conversation, and if they did, well, I say you need to get a life. No one cares what kind of telescope you own!

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
orion61

*****

Reged: 10/20/07

Loc: Birthplace James T Kirk
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: Paco_Grande]
      #6222449 - 11/28/13 10:09 PM

WELL, Tho it's not a great thing here in the beginners, I find it to be astonishingly true! I believe I laughed my way through that thread.. Unfortunately in life, there are those that live to rub it in to people who have "less". My car is more expensive, my House is bigger etc." It is even worse in the Camera forums. That video really hit a home run to me.
It is too bad it offends some people, but I have actually had my old 8" F6 Meade Sono-tube Newtonian LAUGHED AT, and made fun of, by a person like that at a Star party! Even tho it blew away the views through their scope.. I have owned both a Questar and an expensive APO, they are flat out beautiful!
I couldn't justify the cost per inch of performance.
And like someone said, "It is pretty heartbreaking, seeing a Refractor you would die to own, being used as a Finder on a large Dob" That is a direct quote.
Unfortunately our Society applauds Narcissistic, materialistic, tendency..
That video was just plain FUNNY, it's just a good thing the VAST majority of people here don't act like that!
But it does prepare newcomers for a lesson in life.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Vondragonnoggin
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 02/21/10

Loc: Southern CA, USA
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: Paco_Grande]
      #6222519 - 11/28/13 11:06 PM

Quote:

I don't find the video humorous at all. No one in their right mind would hold such a conversation, and if they did, well, I say you need to get a life. No one cares what kind of telescope you own!




Haha. You don't visit the refractor and questar forums then. That was typical convo. I find the video funny because it is really mirroring some threads I've seen.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rdandrea
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 06/13/10

Loc: Colorado, USA DM59ra
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: Vondragonnoggin]
      #6222594 - 11/29/13 12:13 AM

Quote:

I find the video funny because it is really mirroring some threads I've seen.




Yep.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Zedwardson
member


Reged: 11/26/13

Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: rdandrea]
      #6222624 - 11/29/13 12:34 AM

Funny enough, if you where to get the same views from a $400 dollar scope, and a $4000 dollar Scope, I would be more impressed with the $400 dollar one.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
SpooPoker
sage
*****

Reged: 06/04/13

Loc: North Bay CA
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: Zedwardson]
      #6222751 - 11/29/13 02:39 AM

*** Happy Thanksgiving folks from a tipsy man at a keyboard. I am supposed to be going outside to look at Jupiter, my wife says it is good seeing but I prefer a good old rant ****

Quote:

WELL, Tho it's not a great thing here in the beginners, I find it to be astonishingly true! I believe I laughed my way through that thread.. Unfortunately in life, there are those that live to rub it in to people who have "less". My car is more expensive, my House is bigger etc." It is even worse in the Camera forums. That video really hit a home run to me.
It is too bad it offends some people, but I have actually had my old 8" F6 Meade Sono-tube Newtonian LAUGHED AT, and made fun of, by a person like that at a Star party! Even tho it blew away the views through their scope.. I have owned both a Questar and an expensive APO, they are flat out beautiful!
I couldn't justify the cost per inch of performance.
And like someone said, "It is pretty heartbreaking, seeing a Refractor you would die to own, being used as a Finder on a large Dob" That is a direct quote.
Unfortunately our Society applauds Narcissistic, materialistic, tendency..
That video was just plain FUNNY, it's just a good thing the VAST majority of people here don't act like that!
But it does prepare newcomers for a lesson in life.




It is a disgrace that someone shows another disrespect over something as vainglorious as equipment.

It is very very common problem with folks that get a branded item and then try turn it into a religion, vangloriously telling others to follow suit, etc etc...

In archery 3D, I was shooting with an old 2005 bow and got ribbed that my bow was a piece of "insert expletive". You have to shoot Mathews or Bowtech he says. Guns = same deal, my gun is bigger than yours. My truck is bigger than yours. I even once lived in a neighborhood where I carefully landscaped my front lawn and within 6 weeks at least two other neighbors followed suit with something more elaborate - I suppose one cannot exist on this little planet unless you are showing yourself to be one better / one up on another. I can understand this attitude / dog eat dog mentality when professional careers are at stake, but outside of "survival instinct", what does it matter if someone has a nicer garden or truck or rifle or telescope than another?

There is also a placebo like effect involved in luxury goods / purchases (or what is considered by ones peers as being the cream of the crop). I just finished reading a pile of drivel about how one fellow paid a large amount of money on a Unitron (a well respected vintage brand marketing Japanese made long focal length achromats). Pleased as punch, he went on about how great this scope was and how utterly fabulous the images appeared through the eyepiece, rubbing the noses of those reading about how these images were running neck and neck with the best scopes of today and yesteryear. The scope? A 50mm achromat, a complete waste of metal, plastic and glass Unitron sold as a kids scope back in the 1950's. Needless to say, fueled by a "Model Railway Club" mentality, happy at his score (because he has it and few other people have it), he conveys asinine misconceptions to the public that somehow a 50mm Unitron is worthwhile to own. I believe him that the images were wonderful - it is like a placebo effect. He paid a bunch of money on an old kid's scope, he was convinced beforehand that Unitron represented the best out there, and henceforth his observations would confirm his beliefs. I have looked through a variety of Unitron's, and outside of their 6" f/15, 4" f/15 and 76mm f/16, all of their scopes are totally overrated. The 50mm scope they marketed was absolutely awful and virtually unusable. The 60mm model 114 was also a particularly poor scope.

Quote:

Funny enough, if you where to get the same views from a $400 dollar scope, and a $4000 dollar Scope, I would be more impressed with the $400 dollar one.




I would expect the optics and focuser to be better in a more expensive scope. Whether the stars / objects will see a $3600 difference is another matter - maybe slightly better maybe not. Such expensive rigs, particularly at small aperture, are perhaps more inclined towards astrophotography where details are shown that the human eye cannot detect. I only say this because I did a bit of observing through a guy's 4" Takahashi APO and while the quality and images were wonderful through the eyepiece, I was not convinced this 4" scope really was much better than other cheaper 4" examples out there (i.e. an Orion 4" ED). Perhaps in better than 1" seeing or astrophotography the high end Takahashi may flex its muscles a little better than the much cheaper Orion.

Brand names, one must be careful. A lot of the cost is not on the craftmanship or components. Example, go to Saks, grab a Gucci suit costing $3K. You will notice it is a quality suit but... go to a Brooks Brother store, grab a Golden Fleece suit (not seen in brand *BLEEP* circles as being a major luxury brand) marked at $1.8K and note that the suit has the same quality. Easy to tell - look at the material (what kind of wool), the pick stitching, the canvassing, and it is quickly apparent the Brooks Brothers and Gucci suit are made to the same standard, except one costing a heck of a lot less than the other at retail. We will ignore the aesthetic aspects such as cut, lapel style, venting, and fit in this example.

Brand Names :- the workmanship and craft may be first rate, but another brand can match that for far cheaper. It begs the question where did the overhead go?

I am sure the same analogy applies to telescopes. That is not to say a Takahashi or Astrophysics is not worth the investment or have their equals, but it would not surprise me if both companies were selling something that could be made to same standard at half the price. Both are name brands, make no question about it. Astronomers want an Astrophysics for the same reason a banker wants a $7K Hermes suit or Louis Vuitton Briefcase. Great quality and craftmanship, but totally and utterly overpriced. It is pure branding and the customer is paying to wear / use that brand. An optician could hypothetically be so skilled so as to blow the quality to another prestigious level - yet many astronomer's would rather use the branded equipment that all their friends and peers are telling them to get. The way it goes, even if practically it makes no sense.

I would be highly interested in a poll: Takahashi have a high quality scope figured to 1/30wave ever so slightly undercorrected for example. Mark, a small bespoke maker in London, has a similar scope figured to 1/100th wave and perfectly corrected. Both scopes have similar quality build(i.e. focuser, metal, flocking, baffles etc). Price wise, Mark's scope sells for $2500, and Takahashi's scope retails at $3900. My bet would be at least 80% of folks would go to the brand name, even though Mark's scope is cheaper and better.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
drago
sage


Reged: 01/11/08

Loc: Latvia
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: orion61]
      #6222801 - 11/29/13 04:20 AM

very agree with you

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
drago
sage


Reged: 01/11/08

Loc: Latvia
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: SpooPoker]
      #6222808 - 11/29/13 04:29 AM

you write very large texts.
all that can be say very short: tendency to flaunt, boast based on a goods they have, in a very large degree, is a plebes, negligible, small peoples attribute. he measure all to a money or social statuses, because he not have and cannot imagine any another.
and there is also a great thing - a Sturgeon's Law - "ninety percent of everything is *BLEEP*." - it is work on peoples too. sadly, but that's it this world...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
A6Q6
professor emeritus


Reged: 05/31/11

Loc: Stroudsburg,Pa,U.S.A
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: SpooPoker]
      #6222834 - 11/29/13 05:13 AM

Man, there is nothing like a Questar or Brandon thread to get people going. You'd think they were related. But wait! Questar uses Brandon eyepieces. We will never change how others act toward each other. But you and I can only try to do our best. It seems the quality of optics from a $400 dob from China have been very good lately. But the telescope can be the size of a hot water heater. The Quester is the closest thing to having something you can put in you back pocket. I don't see much difference in the cry, "get a dob get a dob" for every answer about what telescope to buy, then if I said get a Questar. Its a point of view.

Edited by A6Q6 (11/29/13 05:19 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jon Isaacs
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 06/16/04

Loc: San Diego and Boulevard, CA
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: A6Q6]
      #6222900 - 11/29/13 07:13 AM

Quote:

I don't see much difference in the cry, "get a dob get a dob" for every answer about what telescope to buy, then if I said get a Questar.




The difficulty with the Questar is that as a telescope, it is very expensive for what you get. A 90mm Maksutov-Cassegrain, no matter how perfect, is still a 90mm Maksutov Cassegrain with limited resolution, limited field of view, limited contrast.

jon


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Vondragonnoggin
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 02/21/10

Loc: Southern CA, USA
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: Jon Isaacs]
      #6222919 - 11/29/13 07:43 AM

I think of a dob as a standard first scope because of cost effectiveness with mass produced type dobs. I think of Questar as a connoisseur scope you would buy after some years in the hobby. Same with an equivalent expense Apo. Something you buy after spending a few years to see if you are going to be in it enough to spend like that.

Same with the funny animation. The longer you been around the hobby and talking with other equipment enthusiasts, the more you'll get exactly what they are saying to each other and the funnier it seems.

When I first saw a Questar and the price they charge, I thought, now there's something I would never buy. A little scope on an odd looking base for so much money.

After some time I'm still not ready to spend, but the thought of owning one becomes more intriguing. If I had the disposable income, I think I might like a small well crafted telescope that was also beautiful enough to use as a decorative piece in your home. I could see myself getting a lot of use from that small scope.



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jon Isaacs
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 06/16/04

Loc: San Diego and Boulevard, CA
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: Vondragonnoggin]
      #6222936 - 11/29/13 08:00 AM

Quote:

I think of Questar as a connoisseur scope you would buy after some years in the hobby. Same with an equivalent expense Apo.




For what it's worth...

Optically, an apo can do things no other scope can, the short focal length combined with the 2 inch focuser and color free optics, an apo can be an excellent all around performer, from the lowest magnifications and widest fields to the highest powers possible for a given aperture. This is not the case with the Questar.

I see the Questar as a dilettante's scope more than an observer's scope.

Jon


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
drago
sage


Reged: 01/11/08

Loc: Latvia
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: Vondragonnoggin]
      #6222939 - 11/29/13 08:01 AM

Quote:

I think of a dob as a standard first scope because of cost effectiveness with mass produced type dobs. I think of Questar as a connoisseur scope you would buy after some years in the hobby. Same with an equivalent expense Apo.





i think, questar buying in no accordance of years in astronomy and so on - it is more to buy a cult thing, like as a fine 1800's gun not shown for selfdefense or so on - there always are a more efficient, and far cheapier solutions for that.
as i understand, questar 3.5" is about 3000 USD?
you can buy a 4" apo, who outperform that questar in all ways, except a its status, and thing, for example, an Arthur Clarke see in one of that questars - and that apo pricey in only a fraction of that questar - about an 600 - 1200 USD in average, as i understand?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
GOLGO13
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 11/05/05

Loc: St. Louis area
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: Jon Isaacs]
      #6222952 - 11/29/13 08:19 AM

I think of questars as being more a piece of art than something you'd want to use too much. It really is a beautiful scope if one was on a desk or something. Kind of like those old school brass telescopes which are mostly for decoration. They still work, but are generally for show.

As far as observing goes I'd take a refractor. But it would be fun to do a side by side.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Vondragonnoggin
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 02/21/10

Loc: Southern CA, USA
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: drago]
      #6222954 - 11/29/13 08:23 AM

I bet by the time this thread is done, there will be enough material to make another funny animation.



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rdandrea
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 06/13/10

Loc: Colorado, USA DM59ra
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: Jon Isaacs]
      #6223179 - 11/29/13 11:10 AM

Quote:

I see the Questar as a dilettante's scope more than an observer's scope.






Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Paco_Grande
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 07/14/12

Loc: Banana Republic of California
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: Vondragonnoggin]
      #6223361 - 11/29/13 12:55 PM

Quote:



Haha. You don't visit the refractor and questar forums then. That was typical convo. I find the video funny because it is really mirroring some threads I've seen.




You're 100% right, I never go over there.

That sort of conversation makes my skin crawl.



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
David PavlichAdministrator
Transmographied
*****

Reged: 05/18/05

Loc: Mandeville, LA USA
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: jca345]
      #6223385 - 11/29/13 01:12 PM

That about covers it! I suspect the next one will deal with eyepieces.

David


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mayidunk
Don't Ask...
*****

Reged: 02/17/10

Loc: Betwixt & Between...
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: Paco_Grande]
      #6223417 - 11/29/13 01:32 PM

It's the difference between a Rolex, and a Timex digital. The Timex generally keeps better time, costs much less initially, and doesn't need expensive maintenance to keep it accurate. However, wearing that Rolex somehow makes you feel special...

Aside from any "bling" factor, I think the draw of the Rolex, and other Swiss watches, is that they're Swiss watches. Hand made movements. Old world craftsmanship. "They just don't make 'em like that, anymore!" There's a certain fascination about that kind of thing that can be very easy to succumb to... provided you can afford it!

Same with the Q. For me, I could easily be seduced by the apparent quality of its construction, its fit, and finish! Of course, the idea of the "portable observatory" appeals to me as well. Everything you need, all in that little, leather case. That leather case!

I had a chance to finally see a Q up close, and personal this past weekend. Didn't get to look through it, but did get to look at it. It was purdy... Real purdy!!! I then looked at my Timex, and saw that it was time for me to go...

Sometimes I look at the ads, and the pictures, and I say, "Someday... Maybe..." But then I look at what I already have, including the "poorman's Q" I have sitting in the closet (original ETX Astro), and I think to myself, "Maybe, but not today."


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
orion61

*****

Reged: 10/20/07

Loc: Birthplace James T Kirk
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: mayidunk]
      #6223493 - 11/29/13 02:07 PM

Quote:

It's the difference between a Rolex, and a Timex digital. The Timex generally keeps better time, costs much less initially, and doesn't need expensive maintenance to keep it accurate. However, wearing that Rolex somehow makes you feel special...

Aside from any "bling" factor, I think the draw of the Rolex, and other Swiss watches, is that they're Swiss watches. Hand made movements. Old world craftsmanship. "They just don't make 'em like that, anymore!" There's a certain fascination about that kind of thing that can be very easy to succumb to... provided you can afford it!

Same with the Q. For me, I could easily be seduced by the apparent quality of its construction, its fit, and finish! Of course, the idea of the "portable observatory" appeals to me as well. Everything you need, all in that little, leather case. That leather case!

I had a chance to finally see a Q up close, and personal this past weekend. Didn't get to look through it, but did get to look at it. It was purdy... Real purdy!!! I then looked at my Timex, and saw that it was time for me to go...

Sometimes I look at the ads, and the pictures, and I say, "Someday... Maybe..." But then I look at what I already have, including the "poorman's Q" I have sitting in the closet (original ETX Astro), and I think to myself, "Maybe, but not today."



Mr Dunk, dont sell that Origonal ETX Astro. The first launch series had exceptional mirrors, better than later ones. I know first hand. I spent $360.00 for mine in late 1996 when they first came out.I was surprised about the Plastic, but amazed by the views.
I still have it,and the origonal box. I will NOT get rid of it!
I have taken 5 or 6 in trade and tested them ALL side by side, none have been able to beat it.
Read Sky and Telescopes review of them.
http://www.analyticalsci.com/Astronomy/Telescopes/Test%20Reports/ETX90/0_ETX_...
MayIdunk I am in complete and udder agreement with you.
I did have to work on my motor drive a to keep it from drifting clear out of the field, before tracking. Now it engages in 2 seconds. I could have sent it back but a buddy of mine bought one at the same time and his lagged too. After looking through mine, there was NO WAY Meade was getting it back. I simply enlarged the motor mount holes and pushed it tighter against the drive gear. I use it as a White Light Solar Scope now.
It got somewhat put on the back shelf when I bought my superb 127 Nexstar SE Maksutov.
I was even able to find a special Aluminum Dew Shield with Constellations and Planetary data on it. It's felt lined & slides over the tube like a Questar.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Billytk
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 04/22/12

Loc: Lake Mary, Fl.
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: mayidunk]
      #6223503 - 11/29/13 02:11 PM

I would have never spent the money on a Questar either. When the one I ownde was given to me I had never heard of one.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mayidunk
Don't Ask...
*****

Reged: 02/17/10

Loc: Betwixt & Between...
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: orion61]
      #6223580 - 11/29/13 02:51 PM

Quote:

Quote:

It's the difference between a Rolex, and a Timex digital. The Timex generally keeps better time, costs much less initially, and doesn't need expensive maintenance to keep it accurate. However, wearing that Rolex somehow makes you feel special...

Aside from any "bling" factor, I think the draw of the Rolex, and other Swiss watches, is that they're Swiss watches. Hand made movements. Old world craftsmanship. "They just don't make 'em like that, anymore!" There's a certain fascination about that kind of thing that can be very easy to succumb to... provided you can afford it!

Same with the Q. For me, I could easily be seduced by the apparent quality of its construction, its fit, and finish! Of course, the idea of the "portable observatory" appeals to me as well. Everything you need, all in that little, leather case. That leather case!

I had a chance to finally see a Q up close, and personal this past weekend. Didn't get to look through it, but did get to look at it. It was purdy... Real purdy!!! I then looked at my Timex, and saw that it was time for me to go...

Sometimes I look at the ads, and the pictures, and I say, "Someday... Maybe..." But then I look at what I already have, including the "poorman's Q" I have sitting in the closet (original ETX Astro), and I think to myself, "Maybe, but not today."



Mr Dunk, dont sell that Origonal ETX Astro. The first launch series had exceptional mirrors, better than later ones. I know first hand. I spent $360.00 for mine in late 1996 when they first came out.I was surprised about the Plastic, but amazed by the views.
I still have it,and the origonal box. I will NOT get rid of it!
I have taken 5 or 6 in trade and tested them ALL side by side, none have been able to beat it.
Read Sky and Telescopes review of them.
http://www.analyticalsci.com/Astronomy/Telescopes/Test%20Reports/ETX90/0_ETX_...
MayIdunk I am in complete and udder agreement with you.
I did have to work on my motor drive a to keep it from drifting clear out of the field, before tracking. Now it engages in 2 seconds. I could have sent it back but a buddy of mine bought one at the same time and his lagged too. After looking through mine, there was NO WAY Meade was getting it back. I simply enlarged the motor mount holes and pushed it tighter against the drive gear. I use it as a White Light Solar Scope now.
It got somewhat put on the back shelf when I bought my superb 127 Nexstar SE Maksutov.
I was even able to find a special Aluminum Dew Shield with Constellations and Planetary data on it. It's felt lined & slides over the tube like a Questar.



Thanks!

I fully agree with you on never selling the ETX! My secondary baffle did wander on me once. I just flipped the OTA, waited about a year, and it migrated back into position, taking all the adhesive back with it! I also had to replace the trunnions, as the bottoms of the mounting screw holes had started to disintegrate. After replacing them, I made sure that the mounting screws were just snug. I was able to find the original screw-on dew shield that Meade originally sold for it, and the right-angle finder scope they were selling for a short time afterwards. Other than replacing the straight-thru finder scope (which I still have), I also installed a flex cable on the focus rod.

I have the original box (in perfect condition), both halves of the cardboard and foam insert, the legs, the users manual, the tools, the little box that the original finder scope came packed in, and the sales receipt, all snug in the plastic bags they originally came in! If I were to pack it all back into the box, it would all look just like it did the day that I first opened it. Someday, after I'm gone, someone, someplace will have that same experience I once had opening that box for the first time! I also have the boxes for the right-angle finder, and the dew shield.

I now keep it in the closet with the tube pointing up, and I make sure that the temps at the meniscus never get above 75*, lest I one day find the secondary baffle hanging by a thread! As for the RA slop, I learned early on how to compensate for it, and so never bothered to tear into it to fix it.

It's an excellent scope, it's still in use, and (the Good Lord willing...) it ain't going anywhere!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mayidunk
Don't Ask...
*****

Reged: 02/17/10

Loc: Betwixt & Between...
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: Billytk]
      #6223585 - 11/29/13 02:53 PM

Quote:

I would have never spent the money on a Questar either. When the one I ownde was given to me I had never heard of one.



As Daffy would have said... "You'rrre dithpicable!"



Edited by mayidunk (11/29/13 02:55 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
orion61

*****

Reged: 10/20/07

Loc: Birthplace James T Kirk
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: mayidunk]
      #6223610 - 11/29/13 03:10 PM

You take care of things like I do! It drives Tracy Crazy, I keep all original packing. I put the Motor focus on mine.
It is 2 speed.
You may want to thing about cleaning the old grease out of yours and replace it with PAO (Polyoiefin) Grease. It is made for Plastic on Plastic lubrication. It wont degrade Plastic like Petro Based lubes! I even put some on my RA setting circle band, I can finally use it! Before it was sticky.
Now both axis movement are silky smooth. My Dec had a bad sticking problem, no more.
My secondary baffle also started coming free. The front cell screws off, I re-glued it with a thin film of Silicone
adhesive.
The best thing about PAO is it does not thicken in the cold, or thin in the heat! My RA motor used to drag a bit causing me to advance the RA every few minutes, now it is dead on!
I owned a mint 1958 Questar, it was beautiful, the Mechanics were the best I had ever touched in anything these fingers had been close to. The people that fabricated the Questars are truely Artists. BUT the optics were Horrible, BAD SA! There were about 5 rings around every Star! I found out Questar didn't make the optics themselves
back then. Now they are as good as the rest of the mount.

I sold it for 2K after my ETX beat it optically! I'd love to have another some day. It is the first scope that I can honestly say gives as much pleasure or more, in the daytime just looking at it, and touching it.
Cool factor and portability the Q wins hands down. APO gets it optically.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Paco_Grande
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 07/14/12

Loc: Banana Republic of California
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: mayidunk]
      #6224240 - 11/29/13 09:23 PM

Quote:

...

Same with the Q. For me, I could easily be seduced by the apparent quality of its construction, its fit, and finish! ...




It is a lovely product for sure. Any high end product has to deliver more than performance. Even the Canon L lenses are marked so others know you have an L lens, either the red line or the body of the lens being off-white. I have an EF-S lens that is essentially an L lens for an APS-C camera (like my 7D) - but it doesn't have the red line and the body is black. It mostly looks like a kit lens - but the performance shows otherwise. Anyway, why not a red line? Because it's not a full frame lens. STATUS!

In this world, status is important at times - you might need it to enter a room - even though most of resist it or don't really care at all. No one is really immune to the siren call of status and image: we just resist the call. Or maybe one simply can't afford it - which is often true for me.

What's his name... Oh yeah, when Jay Leno was on Top Gear some time ago, it was mentioned he owns something like 125 cars. His statement to the crowd was, "If you could afford it, you'd do it, too, wouldn't you?" The crowd whooped and yelled yes. But honestly, hardly anyone owns 125 cars, even those who have 100 times more money than Leno. There is something weird about owning all those cars, but whatever floats his boat.

But it IS nice to own a fine instrument and to appreciate it for what it is, whether it's a Televue 31mm Nagler, an AP refractor, or an Omega watch.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
pogobbler
professor emeritus


Reged: 09/30/08

Loc: Central Indiana, USA
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: Paco_Grande]
      #6224527 - 11/30/13 02:11 AM

Quote:



It is a lovely product for sure. Any high end product has to deliver more than performance. Even the Canon L lenses are marked so others know you have an L lens, either the red line or the body of the lens being off-white. I have an EF-S lens that is essentially an L lens for an APS-C camera (like my 7D) - but it doesn't have the red line and the body is black. It mostly looks like a kit lens - but the performance shows otherwise. Anyway, why not a red line? Because it's not a full frame lens. STATUS!

In this world, status is important at times - you might need it to enter a room - even though most of resist it or don't really care at all. No one is really immune to the siren call of status and image: we just resist the call. Or maybe one simply can't afford it - which is often true for me.

What's his name... Oh yeah, when Jay Leno was on Top Gear some time ago, it was mentioned he owns something like 125 cars. His statement to the crowd was, "If you could afford it, you'd do it, too, wouldn't you?" The crowd whooped and yelled yes. But honestly, hardly anyone owns 125 cars, even those who have 100 times more money than Leno. There is something weird about owning all those cars, but whatever floats his boat.

But it IS nice to own a fine instrument and to appreciate it for what it is, whether it's a Televue 31mm Nagler, an AP refractor, or an Omega watch.




With the lens you mention, I think it's a little more than just status. I think a lens that gives a great full frame image is to be counted a notch above one that provides that quality image over a smaller frame. If nothing else, it adds to its versatility as a full frame lens will perform well with either an APS-C or full frame camera.

As for Jay Leno and his collection of cars, while I'll agree a lot of car collectors do collect for status' sake as much as anything, and they choose what cars they collect accordingly-- and most likely never or almost never actually drive them. Leno, though, has always loved cars and motorcycles and things mechanical and just happens to have the money to indulge his passion. He's got a wealth of knowledge of the cars and actually drives them and isn't afraid to get his hands dirty in them or get them dirty driving them. It takes a certain kind of car nut to take over 100 year old steam powered cars out for a pleasure drive.

I think a love of cars (much like astronomy) is something you either get or not.

By the way, for those who like well-engineered interesting and "different" machines, go to his Jay Leno's Garage website and check out the 1925 Doble steam car. This one certainly changed my opinion about what steam powered cars could achieve.

Come to think of it, I know more than a few amateur astronomers who collect a lot of scopes that very rarely, if ever, see the night sky.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Paco_Grande
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 07/14/12

Loc: Banana Republic of California
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: pogobbler]
      #6225915 - 11/30/13 08:57 PM

Quote:



Come to think of it, I know more than a few amateur astronomers who collect a lot of scopes that very rarely, if ever, see the night sky.




Some pathologies are more damaging than others.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mikey cee
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 01/18/07

Loc: bellevue ne.
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: Paco_Grande]
      #6228837 - 12/02/13 10:58 AM

I can hardly wait for the next animation on binoviewers.....God do we ever need one! Plenty of ammo there. Mike

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
TheObserver
sage
*****

Reged: 09/24/13

Loc: Light Polluted, NY
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: Jon Isaacs]
      #6234606 - 12/05/13 02:31 AM

Dob

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
A6Q6
professor emeritus


Reged: 05/31/11

Loc: Stroudsburg,Pa,U.S.A
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: Paco_Grande]
      #6235062 - 12/05/13 10:20 AM

Phil, Tom said: "I think a love of cars (much like astronomy) is something you either get or not." If you like to mess with mechanical things in your garage, you will understand the collection of those things, I like old Gravely tractors, I have one for plowing snow,blowing snow, and one for mowing. I enjoy working on and with them. In todays world a Questar is not about status, if you get a used one. Its about the highest quality optics in a small package. The built in barlow, Star diagional, and over all quality makes that telescope a joy to use even when you have much bigger ones that will show much more. You really have to spend some time with one to understand.

Edited by A6Q6 (12/05/13 01:14 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
REC
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 10/20/10

Loc: NC
Re: Apo Refractor vs. Questar new [Re: mayidunk]
      #6235267 - 12/05/13 11:59 AM

FYI...I still have my 90ETX spotter from 1998 that I have used to photograph two Solar eclipses and still works great. Loved the pretty blue anodized aluminum tube, pretty scopes!

Bob


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)


Extra information
10 registered and 38 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  WOBentley, kkokkolis, Chuck Hards 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 1503

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics