Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Cats & Casses

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)
curiosidad
sage


Reged: 06/09/11

SC 6 "vs. 5" Mak?
      #5371315 - 08/16/12 09:51 AM

Hello
I'm looking at some Cat model that is manageable enough to move with one hand, not too heavy, but with sufficient diameter to enjoy the deep sky objects and planets ..
Perhaps the SC 6 "Mak or 127 ..? Some others?
Thanks


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
brianb11213
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 02/25/09

Loc: 55.215N 6.554W
Re: SC 6 "vs. 5" Mak? new [Re: curiosidad]
      #5371394 - 08/16/12 10:43 AM

Not much difference in physical size / weight between the 6" SCT and 5" Mak tubes, but the extra aperture is definitely a bonus for deep sky and doesn't hurt for anything else.

Alternatively consider this scope which is the nicest small cat I've seen in a while, and quite reasonably priced - I'm sure this would be available in the USA for about the same price in dollars as we have to pay pounds sterling >8-(


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
RichD
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 11/08/07

Loc: Derbyshire, UK
Re: SC 6 "vs. 5" Mak? new [Re: brianb11213]
      #5371410 - 08/16/12 10:54 AM

In the US, C6. It's a bargain and a great little scope.

The Apex is good too and over here in the UK it's much cheaper than the C6 so it's an easier choice.

You won't go far wrong with either.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
PatHolland
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 10/11/09

Loc: Clever, Missouri
Re: SC 6 "vs. 5" Mak? new [Re: brianb11213]
      #5371491 - 08/16/12 12:00 PM

This scope is sold in the US as the iOptron MAK 150mm Maksutov-Cassegrain OTA. They are sold at several retailers. I took ownership of a used one last week and can't wait to have first light on it, alas, the weather never cooperates when I get a new scope....EVER

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Wes James
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 04/12/06

Re: SC 6 "vs. 5" Mak? new [Re: PatHolland]
      #5371722 - 08/16/12 03:00 PM

The iOptron version is a sweet scope... I have one. Great 2-speed focuser. It's definitely a bigger scope/requires more mount than a 5".

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrbarnett
Eyepiece Hooligan
*****

Reged: 02/28/06

Loc: Petaluma, CA
Re: SC 6 "vs. 5" Mak? new [Re: curiosidad]
      #5389035 - 08/27/12 12:28 AM

I like both, but a C6 with starbright XLT coatings is going to be *much* brighter and go significantly deeper than the 5" MCT which won't have enhanced coatings on the mirrors typically (in addition to losing an inch of aperture to the SCT).

- Jim


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
RobertED
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 07/11/03

Loc: Smithfield, RI
Re: SC 6 "vs. 5" Mak? new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #5389349 - 08/27/12 08:55 AM

Definitely go with a good 6" mak, (or a C-6 w/coatings) if desired!! I had an ORION 5" (127mm) mak-cass and, though good enough for Lunar and Planetary work....it needed more help on deep sky!!! Aperture always wins out!!!

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
titanio
sage


Reged: 02/15/09

Loc: Alicante, Spain
Re: SC 6 "vs. 5" Mak? new [Re: RobertED]
      #5389457 - 08/27/12 10:03 AM

Hi

I would choose the Mak, the contract is much better and the turbulence will affect less them in the SC.

Regards

Toni


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
curiosidad
sage


Reged: 06/09/11

Re: SC 6 "vs. 5" Mak? new [Re: titanio]
      #5389486 - 08/27/12 10:24 AM

..."the turbulence will affect less them in the SC"
Why?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
titanio
sage


Reged: 02/15/09

Loc: Alicante, Spain
Re: SC 6 "vs. 5" Mak? new [Re: curiosidad]
      #5389670 - 08/27/12 12:20 PM

In the C6 6" f10 and 37% secondary obstruction ...
In a Mak 5" f12 and less obstrucction

Toni


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Tank
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 07/27/09

Loc: Stoney Creek, Ontario, CANADA
Re: SC 6 "vs. 5" Mak? new [Re: titanio]
      #5389750 - 08/27/12 01:11 PM

Between the two i would say minimal differences as long as you get a good 6" SCT.
If it were me i would still prefer the MAK from what ive seen.
A 150 MAK would be sweet!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
John59
sage


Reged: 11/06/11

Loc: Round Rock,TX
Re: SC 6 "vs. 5" Mak? new [Re: Tank]
      #5389974 - 08/27/12 03:35 PM

I have Orion's 180mm MCT and really enjoy it. With binoviewers, barlows, focal reducers and a solar filter there is a lot to see. I almost got the 150mm but glad I decided for the more aperture. While I love the MCT also consider where you live. Cool downs on a MCT can be lengthy and if the temperature is continually dropping it may never stabilize for decent viewing. Here is Texas there is not much of a winter so it is no problem.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrbarnett
Eyepiece Hooligan
*****

Reged: 02/28/06

Loc: Petaluma, CA
Re: SC 6 "vs. 5" Mak? new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #5390029 - 08/27/12 04:12 PM

I'd add that the C6 puts up brighter images at a given magnification than the Orion 180mm MCT. The coatings make that much difference. SCTs are also easier to collimate.

- Jim


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mdowns
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 06/12/10

Loc: Englewood,FL
Re: SC 6 "vs. 5" Mak? new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #5390049 - 08/27/12 04:19 PM

I've had a c6 while also owning the orion 127mm mak.For me,side by side,the mak ruled everytime on the planets.For deep sky the 6 will win.In both instance we are not talking about signifigant differences.For "one handed" ease both will work very well on the early cg4's or orion astroviews.Both of these mounts come up often in the classifieds and are inexpensive,even with drives.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Tank
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 07/27/09

Loc: Stoney Creek, Ontario, CANADA
Re: SC 6 "vs. 5" Mak? new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #5390055 - 08/27/12 04:25 PM

Jim
starbright XLT coatings must be great if the image is brigher!
I had a go with a C8 vs my SW 180 MAK and the clear winner was the MAK sharper and brigter wasnt hard to see, wasnt a HD thou.
Could have been a collimation issue but i doubt that would have to do with the brightness!
hmmm
In my mind i would have to go to a 8" HD or a ACF to match my 180 SW MAK, but not sure if that will suffice.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ed Holland
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 06/16/10

Loc: San Jose, CA and Oxford, UK
Re: SC 6 "vs. 5" Mak? new [Re: Tank]
      #5390072 - 08/27/12 04:37 PM

Tank, that's an interesting result (C8 vs SW180). Were you able to compare at very similar magnifications when making the judgement of brightness?

I have an Orion 127 Mak and a C8 (XLT coatings) and the C8 is a very clear winnerin brightness and resolution, which is to be expected. If only I had a full range of Mak sizes against which to make comparisons. I think 5" to 10" in 1" increments should be enough...

Ed


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mdowns
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 06/12/10

Loc: Englewood,FL
Re: SC 6 "vs. 5" Mak? new [Re: Ed Holland]
      #5390134 - 08/27/12 05:27 PM

Ed,
In the past I had an excellent c8(sharp at 350-400x) set up side by side with my 180mm mct orion.In terms of resolution the mak won easily every time.It sank the meade 10 sct I had as well.Both of the larger scopes,to me,were of course brighter but definition ruled,always pulling out finer details,in the case of these comparisons.However in the case of the orginal poster,the differences between my c6 and orion 5" mak were somewhat marginal.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
atelierbks
super member
*****

Reged: 01/29/09

Loc: St. Marsal, France & Grahamsto...
Re: SC 6 "vs. 5" Mak? new [Re: mdowns]
      #5390163 - 08/27/12 05:43 PM

It's my understanding that Bosma makes the iOptron 150mm MCTs. Is that true of the Altair model as well? Does anyone know who ultimately fabricates the Orion 150 and 180 MCTs?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
curiosidad
sage


Reged: 06/09/11

Re: SC 6 "vs. 5" Mak? new [Re: atelierbks]
      #5390191 - 08/27/12 06:05 PM

Then, one inch "up" inch "down" is not especially important, regardless of the type of telescope?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
brianb11213
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 02/25/09

Loc: 55.215N 6.554W
Re: SC 6 "vs. 5" Mak? new [Re: atelierbks]
      #5390193 - 08/27/12 06:07 PM

Quote:

It's my understanding that Bosma makes the iOptron 150mm MCTs. Is that true of the Altair model as well?



They seem to be identical.

Quote:

Does anyone know who ultimately fabricates the Orion 150 and 180 MCTs?



Those are identical to the Skywatcher MCTs of the same apertures and come from a Synta-owned factory in China. And on my experience they're inferior in mechanical construction as well as optically to the Altair 150/1800 Mak. (Single speed focuser with mirror shift vs dual speed apparently free of mirror shift; primary mirror lacks collimation screws on the Synta Maks; finish appears cheaper on the Syntas. And the secondary mirror is a silvered spot on the back of the corrector plate instead of being in an independently adjustable holder.)

Personally I'd prefer a C6 SCT tube to a Synta Mak of the same aperture because it will cool down faster and because the optics can be collimated easily. OTOH I'd certainly prefer the Altair 150/1800 Mak to a C6, for planetary work ... the optics are just so much crisper (once it's cooled). It's a little heavier and bulkier and the light grasp may be fractionally less (due to slightly less efficient coatings) but the quality feels better as well as being better optically and at least you don't have to shell out for a microfocuser as well.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)


Extra information
7 registered and 18 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Starman27, kkokkolis 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 3815

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics